Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Contents -- Preface -- Chapter 1 -- Chapter 2 -- Chapter 3 -- Chapter 4 -- Chapter 5 -- Chapter 6 -- Chapter 7 -- Chapter 8 -- Chapter 9 -- Chapter 10 -- Chapter 11 -- Chapter 12 -- Chapter 13 -- Chapter 14 -- Chapter 15 -- Chapter 16 -- Chapter 17 -- Chapter 18 -- Chapter 19 -- Chapter 20 -- About the Contributors.

Cover -- Content -- Chapter 1 -- Chapter 2 -- Chapter 3 -- Chapter 4 -- Chapter 5 -- Chapter 6 -- Chapter 7 -- Chapter 8 -- Chapter 9 -- Chapter 10 -- Chapter 11 -- Chapter 12 -- Chapter 13 -- Chapter 14 -- Chapter 15 -- Chapter 16 -- Chapter 17 -- Chapter 18 -- Chapter 19 -- Chapter 20 -- Appendix -- Acknowledgement -- Photos.

Brussels, excudebat Jan Mommaert y François Vivien, 1649. ; Citation confidence: The work may be genuine, but there is a heightened possibility that this works could be a bibliographical ghost. An exemplar may survive in only a single copy, or there may be no known surviving copy. ; Citation/reference: IB: 59127

Antwerpen, Hieronymus II Verdussen, 1643. ; Citation confidence: The work may be genuine, but there is a heightened possibility that this works could be a bibliographical ghost. An exemplar may survive in only a single copy, or there may be no known surviving copy. ; Citation/reference: IB: 45909

Reprint of the original Latin text Tentamina semiologica, sive quaedam generalem theoriam signorum spectantia (1789), edited, translated and with an Introduction by Robert E. Innis The 33 sections of this classic text by Hoffbauer have a twofold focus: a descriptive inventory of signs, and a comparison of the expressive and cognitive powers of different sign systems. Using his sign typology as a point of departure, Hoffbauer inquires into the elements of matter and form both necessary and adequate to arrive at a definition of the sign. His purpose in doing so is to present his own version of a general sign theory after pointing out significant errors and weaknesses in the characteristicae universalis of Leibniz, Becher, Toennis, Kalmar, etc. Against the background of criticism of the contemporary deductive sign theories of Lambert, Baumgarten, Mendelssohn, Daries, Wilkins, Kircher and others, Hoffbauer's general semiology gives shape to an outline of a deductive-hypothetical theory of signs. In this historical perspective, Hoffbauer's semiology is of outstanding importance and provides the opportunity to think through once again central and permanent problems of the general science of signs.

The structure of the ensemble and the political background -- The De Europae dissidiis et Bello Turco -- Isocrates -- Vives's choice of Isocratean orations -- The Areopagiticus -- The Nicocles -- Greek editions of Isocrates prior to Vives -- Prior Latin translations of Areopagiticus and Nicocles -- Vives and Isocrates -- Translations of DEDRP -- The DEDRP : the present edition.