Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
80 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Seminar Series, 92-01
Ziemek, M.: Party democracy and local autonomy. - S.183-187. Pae S. M.: American political parties for state and local politics. - S.191-209. Lee J. R.: Local autonomy and intraparty democracy in Korea. - S.210-220. Kim K. J.: Party democracy and local autonomy. - S.259-266. Stephen, N.: Local democracy in Britain - who is in control? - S.267-286. Pai, S. T.: Party democratization and local autonomy in Korea. - S.311-324. Becker-Bloningen, W.: Party democracy and local politics in Germany. - S.325-332
World Affairs Online
Brussels, excudebat Jan Mommaert y François Vivien, 1649. ; Citation confidence: The work may be genuine, but there is a heightened possibility that this works could be a bibliographical ghost. An exemplar may survive in only a single copy, or there may be no known surviving copy. ; Citation/reference: IB: 59127
BASE
Antwerpen, Hieronymus II Verdussen, 1643. ; Citation confidence: The work may be genuine, but there is a heightened possibility that this works could be a bibliographical ghost. An exemplar may survive in only a single copy, or there may be no known surviving copy. ; Citation/reference: IB: 45909
BASE
In: Tongbuga yŏksa chaedan yŏn'gu ch'ongsŏ 34
In: Philosophische Bibliothek Band 95b
In: Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanum Teubneriana
In: Foundations of semiotics Volume 4
Reprint of the original Latin text Tentamina semiologica, sive quaedam generalem theoriam signorum spectantia (1789), edited, translated and with an Introduction by Robert E. Innis The 33 sections of this classic text by Hoffbauer have a twofold focus: a descriptive inventory of signs, and a comparison of the expressive and cognitive powers of different sign systems. Using his sign typology as a point of departure, Hoffbauer inquires into the elements of matter and form both necessary and adequate to arrive at a definition of the sign. His purpose in doing so is to present his own version of a general sign theory after pointing out significant errors and weaknesses in the characteristicae universalis of Leibniz, Becher, Toennis, Kalmar, etc. Against the background of criticism of the contemporary deductive sign theories of Lambert, Baumgarten, Mendelssohn, Daries, Wilkins, Kircher and others, Hoffbauer's general semiology gives shape to an outline of a deductive-hypothetical theory of signs. In this historical perspective, Hoffbauer's semiology is of outstanding importance and provides the opportunity to think through once again central and permanent problems of the general science of signs.