Political Science in Australia*
In: The Australian journal of politics and history: AJPH, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 86-97
ISSN: 1467-8497
85278 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Australian journal of politics and history: AJPH, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 86-97
ISSN: 1467-8497
In: American political science review, Band 25, S. 45-60
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: The Western political quarterly: official journal of Western Political Science Association, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 412
ISSN: 0043-4078
In: The world today, Band 18, S. 335-340
ISSN: 0043-9134
In: American political science review, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 439-442
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: The University Teaching of Social Sciences
In: Teaching in the social sciences
In: American political science review, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 45-60
ISSN: 1537-5943
Confusion reigns almost supreme in the field of political science, particularly when the meaning of terms is involved. Some of our most commonly used words have so many meanings, shades of meaning, and connotations that hearers and readers are frequently at a loss as to the meaning and significance of terms used unless the speaker or writer defines them as he uses them. A cursory examination of the term "state" brought to light no fewer than one hundred forty-five different definitions, even though only a few writers were included who might be classed as radical. Less than half of the definitions were in general agreement. Even this statement is based on the assumption that when the same words were used by two writers they were used to mean the same thing; and I doubt whether the assumption is entirely justifiable. Furthermore, "state" is not the only term in political science which is defined in multifold ways. A similar situation was found when others, especially "law," "government," "political," "administration," were investigated.The process of communication between political scientists, as well as between these scientists and laymen or between laymen and laymen, comes to be a guessing game. Consciously or unconsciously, it is suggested, we are spending much of our time guessing what the sender means when he uses even technical words.
In: American political science review, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 615-627
ISSN: 1537-5943
A nomenclature is a system of names or signs, or both, used in any field of knowledge. Such systems are of value to scientists in a field if they enable positions to be seen more clearly or distinctions to be drawn more readily.In a recent article, Huntington Cairns says: "There prevails, secondly, confusion with respect to the instrument—linguistics—with which the anthropologist, the jurist, or the social scientist must pursue his investigations and through whose medium he must state his conclusions. … But once the social scientist passes from these simple aspects to the realm of theory, linguistics becomes a problem and it is in his struggle with this problem that he is most envious of the symbolism of the mathematician."1Confusion and uncertainty appear to be present in several sections of political science. Linguistics is a problem for us in theory; in addition, it is a serious one in teaching and in the field of research.When a problem appears in a field of knowledge which handicaps effective work, experiments are in order, not only to analyze the phenomenon itself, but, in addition, to find ways or means by which the causes producing the unfortunate circumstance may be removed, or at least reduced. Can the apparent confusion and uncertainty among political scientists concerning the meaning of terms, labels, or intellectual positions be reduced? This is an important problem which directs our attention to the possibility of developing a nomenclature for political science.
In: American political science review, Band 40, S. 775-788
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: American political science review, Band 36, S. 734-750
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, S. 87-92
ISSN: 0033-362X
In: American political science review, Band 48, S. 427-449
ISSN: 0003-0554
Report prepared for the International political science association.
In: American political science review, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 294-294
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 240-253
ISSN: 1086-3338
Is anyone's esteem for political science better suppressed than a political scientist's? Ordinary modesty is admirable, but his is professionally destructive. For, not only hiding his light under a bushel, he follows the more nihilistic course of blowing it out. Granted that many political scientists neither deprecate their discipline nor permit a low regard for it to stultify their work, I have been repeatedly assured by members of the profession that no social science is more retarded and none less promising for systematic theory. Thus they hide—even from their own eyes—their discipline's accomplishments. This I shall try to show, offering two books as evidence. There is other evidence, too. When even politically ignorant undergraduates complain that the major in political science is thin, no imaginable poverty of the field explains enough. Such a phenomenon proves concealment, either deliberate or unintended.