The phenomenon of exceptional (to the extent of chaos) conceptual and terminological diversity is currently observed in the research of S&T development and in the practice of public administration of science and technology in the Russian Federation. It has the most strong and negative impact at the federal level as it appears in the strategic planning documents, which sum up and put into action the governmental science and technology policy (in terms of goal setting, forecasting, planning and programming the socio-economic development and national security). The article seeks to comprehend and explain the root cause of this conceptual and terminological diversity, that lie, in the author's opinion, in the excessive decentralization and weak public administration of the S&T development in the country. In the face of new global challenges and threats the leading role of the state in S&T development should be drastically increased. The article outlines juridical principles of the Russian S&T modernization at the current stage of development.
Blockchain is a new information technology that can be used in many areas of human activity. The fi rst and most famous example of the use of blockchain technology is the Bitcoin cryptocurrency. Today, cryptocurrency has transformed into a publicly recognized means of payment, a virtual currency that is accepted by large and small enterprises, corporations and services. Today, they conduct research and implement a number of projects using Blockchain technology in such areas as healthcare, media, electronic voting, fi le storage, smart contracts, insurance, the public sector (issuing passports, collecting taxes, registering land plots), etc. The IBM Corporation is researching Blockchain technology and is working on the creation of software, with the help of which partners will be able to conclude digital contracts that will be recorded in the global network. IBM is also implementing a project called Adept, which aims to track network-connected devices using Blockchain technology. The purpose of this article is to study the directions of using Blockchain in public policy.
The article considers environmental law policy as a component, an independent type of national legal policy, as well as state and sectoral environmental policy. The existence of correlative, mutual influence of ecological and legal doctrine on formation of the corresponding policy is proved. It is substantiated that the ecological and legal legal doctrine significantly influences the current state of the state ecological policy (and this influence is mutual), formation of the ecological legislation and integration of Ukraine into the European legal space. It was stated that Ukraine first of all needs to intensify law-making, modernize the provisions of the environmental and legal doctrine, based on the concepts of which will be revised, updated provisions of public policy, legal understanding, and hence law enforcement. Further institutionalization of the basic provisions of the ecological and legal doctrine in the legislation becomes a necessary condition for the further development of law-making and statehood. It is emphasized that the use of environmental and legal doctrine will speed up the lawmaking process, in particular due to the adaptation of regulations to European standards; formulate legislative definitions that will gradually become an important part of environmental regulations; develop a "road map" for the development of environmental policy and legislation, etc. It is emphasized that the current state of the legal system requires a fuller use of the lawmaking potential of environmental law doctrine and the implementation of its main functions – stabilizing, guiding, heuristic, rule-making, evaluative and prognostic. Therefore, it is expedient to apply the ecological and legal doctrine as a methodological platform of the ecological and legal policy. The necessity of developing concepts of systematization of the ecological legislation, and also legal policy is proved.
Introduction. The article presents the results of studying the problem of interaction between science and diplomacy, the analysis of scientific diplomacy in domestic and foreign practice. The purpose of the article is to analyze scientific diplomacy as a phenomenon within the framework of he state's foreign policy and as a form of public diplomacy. Methods. The methodological basis of the study was general scientific methods, such as analysis, synthesis and generalization; empirical level methods: observation, comparison, grouping; special research methods. Results and Discussion. The article sets forth the interpretation of the concept of scientific diplomacy by various authors, reviewed its «classical» areas, conducted a retrospective analysis of scientific diplomacy in Russia. The article highlights and describes the features characteristic of the domestic practice of using scientific diplomacy at the present stage of development. In particular, the author gives the examples of joint projects implementation, carries out an analysis of information on the joint publications of Russian and foreign scientists stimulating international cooperation in science and technology, which is one of the goals of science diplomacy. Conclusion. The author has given recommendations for improving the mechanism for implementing and widely introducing into national practice the basics of scientific diplomacy for the purpose of strengthening international cooperation and the national goals of the state.
The article analyzes the phenomenon of public policy as a process of reflecting the interests of society through dialogue with the authorities with the help of a well-functioning communication process. We consider the American and European traditions in the definition of this concept. We describe the characteristics of public policy in political science. The article says of public policy development in terms of the information age, the functioning of its online space, namely, the role of social networks as a new subject of public policy.Keywords: publicity, public sphere, public policy, the online space, Internet, social networks. ; У статті аналізується феномен публічної політики як процес відображення інтересів суспільства через діалог з владою за допомогою налагодженого комунікаційного процесу. Розглянуто американську та європейську традиції у визначенні цього концепту. Окреслені характеристики публічної політики у політичній науці. Зазначено про розвиток публічної політики за умов інформаційної доби, функціонування її в онлайн просторі, а саме про роль соціальних мереж як нового суб'єкта публічної політики. Ключові слова: публічність, публічна сфера, публічна політика, онлайн-простір, Інтернет, соціальні мережі.
The article investigates the multidimensional features of the public opinion influence on forming and realization of the foreign-policy activity of the country. The interdisciplinary approach, that connected work from sociology, law, political science and international relations, was used. On the basis of historical method, it was succeeded to extrapolate the received practices of the ХXth century as for taking into account of public idea on modern international events, a system method defined the state as a subject of international relations, taking into account the separate role of its institutes, a comparative method allowed to distinguish the features of influence of citizens on state decisions in the different political modes, and behaviorism allowed to distinguish the terms of change of the citizens' behavior, society in relation to a foreign policy. The realized analysis of the scientific approaches of realism and liberalism defined the historical epochs of their forming and basic tendencies of taking into account or ignoringthe citizens' moods at the level of the public policy in relation to the short-term and strategic tasks of power in its international cooperation. The groups of countries were certain, where they are most represented. It has been found that, the delineation of manipulative constituent of forming the public opinion became the important conclusion of the research by means of mass-media, by specially democratic countries, in relation to the most essential events as intruding in the other country, coalition participating in international conflicts, intervention, membership in intergovernmental organizations and others like that. Thereafter, it was well proven that the public opinion is the important process of the legitimacy of the foreign-policy activity of the state both inside the state and in cooperating with international players.
The study provides an overview and thorough analysis of the current state of affairs, positive achievements, possible shortcomings and prospects of public administration bodies actions aimed at achieving socially significant goals and tasks related to them. The author presents a holistic and modernized view of the modern public policy key tasks. Emphasis is placed on identifying the positive or negative impact of public policy on some spheres of public life: economy (GDP growth, wages, unemployment reduction), social sphere (health care, education) and socio-cultural sphere.In the current conditions of society and state development, Ukraine faces a number of large-scale problems that are not fully resolved today, namely, the creation of innovative theory and practice of public administration, the formation of a new generation of leaders who can make effective decisions, analyzing the current situation and using existing resource.Formation of civil society, development of the rule of law, the need to neutralize negative trends, increasing pressure on government agencies from society, the need to form the principles of public policy in Ukraine require understanding of complex mechanisms of public activity.Global risks that threaten the world have created new challenges in the field of public policy as a form of political process implemented in public space, supported by information and communication resources and represented by a set of transparent vertical and horizontal interactions of its participants.A feature of modern political processes is a significant increase in the demands that society places on the political system, which encourages the state to transfer some functions to other, non-state, actors, who are increasingly involved in processes of policy development aimed at ensuring public interests and objectives.Requests for public policy in Ukraine are due to the fact that many interest groups have a real opportunity to participate in shaping the political agenda, to influence the process of development and implementation of political decisions and together with all participants to build a complex network of relationships. ; У дослідженні проводиться огляд та ґрунтовний аналіз сучасного стану справ, позитивних досягнень, можливих недоліків та перспектив дій органів публічного управління, спрямованих на досягнення суспільно значущих цілей та виконання пов'язаних з ними завдань. Викладено цілісне та модернізоване уявлення про ключові завдання сучасної публічної політики. Акцентується увага на виявленні позитивного чи негативного впливу публічної політики на деякі сфери суспільного життя: економіка (зростання ВВП, заробітних плат, зменшення безробіття), соціальна сфера (охорона здоров'я, освіта) та соціокультурна сфера.У сучасних умовах розвитку суспільства і держави перед Україною стоїть низка масштабних проблем, які сьогодні не повністю вирішені, а саме: створення інноваційної теорії та практики публічного управління, формування світогляду керівників нової генерації, які можуть ухвалювати ефективні рішення, аналізуючи наявний стан речей та використовуючи наявні ресурси.
The study provides an overview and thorough analysis of the current state of affairs, positive achievements, possible shortcomings and prospects of public administration bodies actions aimed at achieving socially significant goals and tasks related to them. The author presents a holistic and modernized view of the modern public policy key tasks. Emphasis is placed on identifying the positive or negative impact of public policy on some spheres of public life: economy (GDP growth, wages, unemployment reduction), social sphere (health care, education) and socio-cultural sphere.In the current conditions of society and state development, Ukraine faces a number of large-scale problems that are not fully resolved today, namely, the creation of innovative theory and practice of public administration, the formation of a new generation of leaders who can make effective decisions, analyzing the current situation and using existing resource.Formation of civil society, development of the rule of law, the need to neutralize negative trends, increasing pressure on government agencies from society, the need to form the principles of public policy in Ukraine require understanding of complex mechanisms of public activity.Global risks that threaten the world have created new challenges in the field of public policy as a form of political process implemented in public space, supported by information and communication resources and represented by a set of transparent vertical and horizontal interactions of its participants.A feature of modern political processes is a significant increase in the demands that society places on the political system, which encourages the state to transfer some functions to other, non-state, actors, who are increasingly involved in processes of policy development aimed at ensuring public interests and objectives.Requests for public policy in Ukraine are due to the fact that many interest groups have a real opportunity to participate in shaping the political agenda, to influence the process of development and implementation of political decisions and together with all participants to build a complex network of relationships. ; У дослідженні проводиться огляд та ґрунтовний аналіз сучасного стану справ, позитивних досягнень, можливих недоліків та перспектив дій органів публічного управління, спрямованих на досягнення суспільно значущих цілей та виконання пов'язаних з ними завдань. Викладено цілісне та модернізоване уявлення про ключові завдання сучасної публічної політики. Акцентується увага на виявленні позитивного чи негативного впливу публічної політики на деякі сфери суспільного життя: економіка (зростання ВВП, заробітних плат, зменшення безробіття), соціальна сфера (охорона здоров'я, освіта) та соціокультурна сфера.У сучасних умовах розвитку суспільства і держави перед Україною стоїть низка масштабних проблем, які сьогодні не повністю вирішені, а саме: створення інноваційної теорії та практики публічного управління, формування світогляду керівників нової генерації, які можуть ухвалювати ефективні рішення, аналізуючи наявний стан речей та використовуючи наявні ресурси.
The subject of the study is the policy of the Russian Federation to manage the scientific potential of higher education. The purpose of this article is to identify and characterize the trends in modern public policy in this area. As a basic method of research, a system-dynamic approach to policy research is used that involves the allocation of spatial, temporal and technological components. At the same time, the author focuses on the temporary component of the state policy for managing the scientific potential of higher education, which is revealed through the characterization of various stages of its life cycle. Primary data were obtained as a result of an in-depth expert questionnaire, as well as a focus group interview.The main theoretical result of the study is to substantiate the category "life cycle of public policy", covering such major stages as its formation, implementation and evaluation. It is proved that each stage corresponds to a certain type of assessment of the scientific potential of higher education: factor, performance and final. The article gives an original approach to the research of the life cycle of the state policy on management of the scientific potential of the higher school, the interrelation of its stages and stages of the life cycle of the most scientific potential of the higher school is grounded.The main empirical result of the study is the identification of the main risks in the processes under consideration and an analysis of the specific influences of various public and political organizations on their formation. The practical significance of the results obtained is conditioned by the possibility of their use in the development of the concept of state policy for the development of university science. ; Предметом исследования выступает политика Российской Федерации по управлению научным потенциалом высшей школы. Целью настоящей статьи является выявление и характеристика тенденций современной государственной политики в указанной сфере. В качестве базового метода исследования используется системно-динамический подход к изучению политики, предполагающий выделение пространственного, временного и технологического ее компонентов. При этом основное внимание в рамках настоящей статьи автор уделяет временному компоненту государственной политики по управлению научным потенциалом высшей школы, раскрываемому через характеристику различных стадий ее жизненного цикла. Первичные данные получены в результате заочного экспертного анкетирования, а также фокус-группового интервью.Основной теоретический результат проведенного исследования заключается в обосновании категории «жизненный цикл государственной политики», охватывающий такие главные стадии, как ее формирование, реализация и оценка. Доказано, что каждой из стадий соответствует определенный тип оценки научного потенциала высшей школы: факторная, результативная и итоговая. В статье приводится оригинальный подход к исследованию жизненного цикла государственной политики по управлению научным потенциалом высшей школы, обосновывается взаимосвязь его стадий и стадий жизненного цикла самого научного потенциала высшей школы.Основным эмпирическим результатом исследования является выявление основных рисков в рассматриваемых процессах и анализ особенностей влияния различных общественных и политических организаций на их формирование. Практическая значимость полученных результатов обусловлена возможностью их использования при разработке концепции государственной политики по развитию университетской науки.
Despite rather big globalization penetrating itself a huge layer of the public relations, the world remains a wide variety of cultural and national peculiarities, moral and ethical values inherent in any society. However, the unification process not always positively affects the public order and the valuable sphere which developed in the concrete country. Strengthening of the economic relations between the states directly influences also the legal sphere where foreign norms stick into the domestic legislation and respectively involuntarily impose behaviour model which contradicts law and order of this country by means of the norms. Any sovereign state will not allow the existence of the destroying norms of the foreign state within the boundaries of their jurisdiction because they have unique legislation. The Institute of the public order must serve as a mainstay from foreign norms, capable to harm to public order in the country. The article discussed the nature, value and role of the public policy clause. Identified the lack of a unified concept of the 'public order' considered its components sigh. Came to the conclusion that the value of the reservation of the public orders as a fundamental principle is one of the manifestations of state sovereignty.
The article considers the problems in change of the content and character of public policy because of distribution of modern information technologies. The author includes of some functions of traditional media, and also necessity of formation of qualitatively new forms of socio-political interaction at the basis of horizontal network communications on the list of such problems. According to the author, Public Policy Online became today an objective reality, and thus demands respectful attention of the basic participants of modern political process. Formation of political resonance is an important element of modern Online-publicity and creates essentially new possibilities for the state's policy-making of in modern conditions. ; В статье автором рассматриваются проблемы изменения содержания и характера публичной политики вследствие распространения современных информационных технологий. В число таких проблем автор включает исчерпание ряда функций традиционных медиа, а также необходимость формирования качественно новых форм социально-политического взаимодействия на базе горизонтальных сетевых связей. По мнению автора, публичная политика Online стала сегодня объективной реальностью и требует к себе соответствующего внимания основных участников современного политического процесса. Формирование политических резонансов является важным элементом современной Online-публичности и создает принципиально новые возможности для формирования политики государства в современных условиях.
Problem setting. Environmental issues are one of the most important in today's globalized world. Environmental protection, rational use of natural resources, maintenance of environmental safety are determined by the legislation of Ukraine as a necessary condition for sustainable economic and social development of the country. NGOs in the field of environmental protection are formed by active members of society and play a key role in implementing the principles of public participation in decision-making. The activity of such organizations is aimed at expanding environmental activities into society, awareness and active public addressing of environmental issues.Recent research and publications analysis. The problems of NGOs' participation in the processes of formation and implementation of state policy were studied by E. Afonin, R. Voitovich, L. Honyukova, G. Hoshovska, V. Namestnik, T. Fedorenko, S. Teleshun, T. Alexandrov, T. Andriychuk, M. Vihlyaev, A. Voloshin, K. Glubochenko, M. Latsiba, N. Oksha, S. Stetsenko, O. Fedorov and others. The research of the environmental movement in Ukraine, its role in the processes of formation of ecological consciousness and ecological culture of Ukrainian society were accomplished by M. Aleksiyovets, S. Vasyuta, T. Hardashchuk, S. Gensiruk, V. Krysachenko, V. Namestnik, O. Stegnii, M. Hilko and others.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. Despite many studies in the field of NGOs' activity, their participation in the formation and implementation of public policy, the issues of effective interaction of environmental organizations with public authorities are poorly studied and require more detailed analysis.The purpose of the article is to substantiate public participation in the process of public-administrative decision-making in the field of environmental protection as the main factor of democracy and development of civil society in the country.Paper main body. One of the main prerequisites in the development of democracy is the participation of wide population' groups in the process of decision-making. The regulations for interaction of public authorities and organizations of civil society in the formulation and implementation of public policies are generally created in democratic Ukraine. However, public organizations do not always effectively use the mechanisms of cooperation with the government.Engaging citizens to participate in decision-making should be based on relevant principles. The fundamental principles of public participation in policy making are: the principle of citizen' confidence in the government, the principle of government openness and transparency, the principle of objectivity, the principle of coordination, the presence of effective mechanisms to inform citizens, alternatives in discussing of practical aspects of problem-solving and others.The level of citizen' participation at different stages of the decision-making process may vary depending on the intensity of the attraction. There are four levels of participation, from the lowest to the highest engagement. These include information, consultation, dialogue and partnership.The real impetus for the development of the issues of public participation in the management of public affairs in environmental protection sphere was the ratification of the Aarhus Convention, UN/ECE, by Ukraine.Public participation in policy making and democracy in the western world have always been a part of environmental movement and environmental political theory.Environmental democracy is based on the idea that active public participation is crucial to ensure equitable consideration of public interests in decision-making considering the land and other natural resources. At its core, environmental democracy involves three mutually reinforcing rights: the right to free access to information on the quality and environmental issues; the right to democratic and constructive participation in decision-making; the right to enforce environmental regulations or compensation for damages. Even though these rights are widely recognized as fundamental for a responsible, equitable and effective environmental management, the extent to which countries have established them by means of laws and regulations still must be systematically measured. If ecological democracy is designed to ensure sustainable development, the rights to access to information, participation and justice on environmental issues should be recognized and enshrined by regulations of the country.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Rational use of natural resources and provision of environmental safety, enhancement of public awareness level and environmental awareness should be the priorities of public environmental policy. Public participation in environmental policy-making processes, defining the ways of management and environmental protection is a decisive factor and has a decisive influence on policy making in developed countries.Environmental democracy is defined as public participation and an environmentally sound form of collective decision-making that determines their priority, based on long-term public interests. The principles of environmental democracy should be used not only to criticize the existing institutional mechanisms of public-state interaction, but also to find other ways of their interaction.The prospect of further research is to conduct an in-depth analysis of the issues of public environmental awareness in the countries with different economic development level. ; Аргументовано, що підвищення рівня інформаційної обізнаності громадськості з питань охорони довкілля та забезпечення її широкої участі у прийнятті державно-управлінських рішень щодо охорони навколишнього середовища має бути пріоритетом держави, яка прагне налагодити ефективну взаємодію з громадськістю. Зазначено, що, своєю чергою, участь громадськості при розробленні державної політики допомагає вирішенню складних соціальних та екологічних проблем суспільства. Доведено, що зазначене є однією з основних передумов розвитку демократії. Розглянуто основні міжнародні та національні нормативні акти у сфері охорони навколишнього природного середовища. Наведено рівні участі громадян на різних етапах процесу прийняття державно-управлінських рішень. Розглянуто поняття екологічної демократії та визначено, що розвиток освіти і поширення екологічної інформації стимулюють відповідальність громадськості у вирішенні екологічних питань.
Problem setting. Environmental issues are one of the most important in today's globalized world. Environmental protection, rational use of natural resources, maintenance of environmental safety are determined by the legislation of Ukraine as a necessary condition for sustainable economic and social development of the country. NGOs in the field of environmental protection are formed by active members of society and play a key role in implementing the principles of public participation in decision-making. The activity of such organizations is aimed at expanding environmental activities into society, awareness and active public addressing of environmental issues.Recent research and publications analysis. The problems of NGOs' participation in the processes of formation and implementation of state policy were studied by E. Afonin, R. Voitovich, L. Honyukova, G. Hoshovska, V. Namestnik, T. Fedorenko, S. Teleshun, T. Alexandrov, T. Andriychuk, M. Vihlyaev, A. Voloshin, K. Glubochenko, M. Latsiba, N. Oksha, S. Stetsenko, O. Fedorov and others. The research of the environmental movement in Ukraine, its role in the processes of formation of ecological consciousness and ecological culture of Ukrainian society were accomplished by M. Aleksiyovets, S. Vasyuta, T. Hardashchuk, S. Gensiruk, V. Krysachenko, V. Namestnik, O. Stegnii, M. Hilko and others.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. Despite many studies in the field of NGOs' activity, their participation in the formation and implementation of public policy, the issues of effective interaction of environmental organizations with public authorities are poorly studied and require more detailed analysis.The purpose of the article is to substantiate public participation in the process of public-administrative decision-making in the field of environmental protection as the main factor of democracy and development of civil society in the country.Paper main body. One of the main prerequisites in the development of democracy is the participation of wide population' groups in the process of decision-making. The regulations for interaction of public authorities and organizations of civil society in the formulation and implementation of public policies are generally created in democratic Ukraine. However, public organizations do not always effectively use the mechanisms of cooperation with the government.Engaging citizens to participate in decision-making should be based on relevant principles. The fundamental principles of public participation in policy making are: the principle of citizen' confidence in the government, the principle of government openness and transparency, the principle of objectivity, the principle of coordination, the presence of effective mechanisms to inform citizens, alternatives in discussing of practical aspects of problem-solving and others.The level of citizen' participation at different stages of the decision-making process may vary depending on the intensity of the attraction. There are four levels of participation, from the lowest to the highest engagement. These include information, consultation, dialogue and partnership.The real impetus for the development of the issues of public participation in the management of public affairs in environmental protection sphere was the ratification of the Aarhus Convention, UN/ECE, by Ukraine.Public participation in policy making and democracy in the western world have always been a part of environmental movement and environmental political theory.Environmental democracy is based on the idea that active public participation is crucial to ensure equitable consideration of public interests in decision-making considering the land and other natural resources. At its core, environmental democracy involves three mutually reinforcing rights: the right to free access to information on the quality and environmental issues; the right to democratic and constructive participation in decision-making; the right to enforce environmental regulations or compensation for damages. Even though these rights are widely recognized as fundamental for a responsible, equitable and effective environmental management, the extent to which countries have established them by means of laws and regulations still must be systematically measured. If ecological democracy is designed to ensure sustainable development, the rights to access to information, participation and justice on environmental issues should be recognized and enshrined by regulations of the country.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Rational use of natural resources and provision of environmental safety, enhancement of public awareness level and environmental awareness should be the priorities of public environmental policy. Public participation in environmental policy-making processes, defining the ways of management and environmental protection is a decisive factor and has a decisive influence on policy making in developed countries.Environmental democracy is defined as public participation and an environmentally sound form of collective decision-making that determines their priority, based on long-term public interests. The principles of environmental democracy should be used not only to criticize the existing institutional mechanisms of public-state interaction, but also to find other ways of their interaction.The prospect of further research is to conduct an in-depth analysis of the issues of public environmental awareness in the countries with different economic development level. ; Аргументовано, що підвищення рівня інформаційної обізнаності громадськості з питань охорони довкілля та забезпечення її широкої участі у прийнятті державно-управлінських рішень щодо охорони навколишнього середовища має бути пріоритетом держави, яка прагне налагодити ефективну взаємодію з громадськістю. Зазначено, що, своєю чергою, участь громадськості при розробленні державної політики допомагає вирішенню складних соціальних та екологічних проблем суспільства. Доведено, що зазначене є однією з основних передумов розвитку демократії. Розглянуто основні міжнародні та національні нормативні акти у сфері охорони навколишнього природного середовища. Наведено рівні участі громадян на різних етапах процесу прийняття державно-управлінських рішень. Розглянуто поняття екологічної демократії та визначено, що розвиток освіти і поширення екологічної інформації стимулюють відповідальність громадськості у вирішенні екологічних питань.
The research aims at the establishment of main principles, priorities and directions of the environmental industrial policy development in the Russian Federation. Environmental industrial policy is considered as a part of the industrial policy aimed at the formation of highly technological competitive national industry providing for the transfer of the economy from the export of raw materials to the innovation type of development. The international experience of the implementation of industrial policies is analysed; it is shown that re-industrialisation leads to strengthening the role of the state regulation and planning both in developed and developing countries. Peculiarities of the international approaches to forming "green" industrial policy are considered. Main principles of the environmental industrial policy development in the Russian Federation are formulated as follows: (1) industrial modernisation providing for the resource efficiency enhancement and the reduction of the negative environmental impact and (2) recycling of waste (its return to the economic cycle). It is emphasised that the environmental industrial policy priorities reflect foremost national purposes and strategic objectives of the Russian Federation development.
The third and final article of the three-part series of articles «Artificial intelligence in the economy and politics of our time» (the first and second articles of the series were published in the fourth and fifth issues of the journal for this year, respectively) presents the results of a study of the goals, motivations and specifics of the adoption of national strategies to support the development of artificial intelligence in different countries. It is shown that such a strategy in Russia is based on the idea of the most important role of using artificial intelligence in solving the most complex economic, social, and military-political problems of the country. Differences in conceptual approaches to the development of research and practical use of artificial intelligence developments in the national strategies of the largest countries of the world — the United States, China and India.
