The Conciliatory Powers of the World Court: The Case of the Free Zones of Upper Savoy
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 350-353
ISSN: 2161-7953
87424 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 350-353
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015086549477
Issued as part of Technologic Papers of the Bureau of Standards, Volume 19, 1925. Prior to Vol. 16 issued as separate papers only and not consecutively paginated. ; Running title: Paints and paint materials. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: American journal of international law, Band 25, S. 203-213
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 801-804
ISSN: 2161-7953
New and rev. ed. of The World court, 1922-1928. ; 3 p.l., 199, xli p.
BASE
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 20, Heft 4, S. 670-688
ISSN: 2161-7953
" I have often taken occasion to remark that next to the Church, the Mixed Courts are the most successful international institution in history." (Farewell address of Sir Maurice Amos, Judicial Adviser to the Egyptian Government, Alexandria, March 25,1925, trans.)
In: International conciliation, Heft 197
ISSN: 0020-6407
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 440-460
ISSN: 2161-7953
Arbitration in the Nineteenth Century. While arbitration was employed for the settlement of international disputes throughout the nineteenth century, it was employed more frequently in the later than in the earlier part of the century. In most cases, resort to arbitration depended upon an ad hoc agreement between the states concerned; the tribunal to which a dispute was referred was created ad hoc, and it ceased to function when the particular dispute was disposed of. It was hardly before the middle of the century that states began to agree in advance to have resort to arbitration, and these agreements were usually very restricted. General bipartite arbitration treaties were all but unknown prior to 1850; and even when they became more numerous their provisions were seldom all-embracing. Increasingly, however, states began to agree in advance to arbitrate special questions. In a few cases, provisions for the arbitration of certain disputes were included in multipartite instruments: the Universal Postal Convention of October 9, 1874 (Article 16), the General Act of Brussels of July 2, 1890 (Article 55), and the Convention on Railway Freight Transportation of October 14, 1890 (Article 57), are outstanding examples.
In: American journal of international law, Band 27, S. 440-460
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: American journal of international law, Band 20, S. 670-688
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 136, Heft 1, S. 105-111
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: International affairs
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Heft 225, S. 105-111
ISSN: 0002-7162
In: Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, Band 7, S. 217-227