Suchergebnisse

This last title in the series covers the most important findings of the five yearsEU sponsored ANTICORRP project dealing with corruption and organized crime.How prone to corruption are EU funds? Has EU managed to improve governancein the countries that it assists? Using the new index of public integrity and avariety of other tools created in the project this issue looks at how EU funds andnorms affected old member states (like Spain), new member states (Slovakia,Romania), accession countries (Turkey) and the countries recipient of developmentfunds (Egypt, Tanzania, Tunisia). The data covers over a decade of structuraland development funds, and the findings show the challenges to changing governanceacross borders, the different paths that each country has experiencedand suggest avenues of reforming development aid for improving governance.

This last title in the series covers the most important findings of the five years EU sponsored ANTICORRP project dealing with corruption and organized crime. How prone to corruption are EU funds? Has EU managed to improve governance in the countries that it assists? Using the new index of public integrity and a variety of other tools created in the project this issue looks at how EU funds and norms affected old member states (like Spain), new member states (Slovakia, Romania), accession countries (Turkey) and the countries recipient of development funds (Egypt, Tanzania, Tunisia). The data covers over a decade of structural and development funds, and the findings show the challenges to changing governance across borders, the different paths that each country has experienced and suggest avenues of reforming development aid for improving governance.

Acknowledgements -- Contents -- About the Author -- Introduction -- 1 Money Laundering Through Real Estate -- 1.1 The Nguema Obiang Cases -- 1.2 New York Real Estate -- Bibliography -- 2 Money Laundering Through Agribusiness -- Bibliography -- 3 Money Laundering Typologies Evidenced in the "Panama Papers" -- 3.1 Offshore Companies and Concealing the Beneficial Owner -- 3.1.1 Remittance Companies and Black Market Moneychangers -- 3.1.2 NGOs and Trusts -- Bibliography -- 4 Efforts to Combat Money Laundering -- 4.1 Property Confiscation -- 4.2 International Legal Cooperation -- 4.3 Asset Repatriation -- Bibliography -- 5 Conclusions -- Bibliography -- 6 Proposals to Improve the War Against Money Laundering Through Real Estate and Agribusiness -- 6.1 An International Perspective -- 6.1.1 Financial Action Task Force (FATF) -- 6.1.2 Tax Havens, Offshore Accounts, and Trusts -- 6.1.3 International Legal Cooperation and Repatriation -- 6.2 A National Perspective -- 6.2.1 Freezing, Seizing, Confiscating, and Repatriating Assets -- 6.2.2 Regulatory Agencies -- 6.2.3 Payments, Remittances, and Financial Institutions -- 6.2.4 Offshore Accounts and Trusts -- 6.2.5 NPOs and Foundations -- 6.2.6 Money Laundering Laws: Reports, Rural Activity, and Lawyers -- 6.2.7 Law Enforcement Agencies and Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) -- 6.2.8 Investigating and Prosecuting Tax Fraud -- 6.2.9 Real Estate Brokers and Joint Owners -- Bibliography -- Index

This last title in the series covers the most important findings of the five yearsEU sponsored ANTICORRP project dealing with corruption and organized crime.How prone to corruption are EU funds? Has EU managed to improve governancein the countries that it assists? Using the new index of public integrity and avariety of other tools created in the project this issue looks at how EU funds andnorms affected old member states (like Spain), new member states (Slovakia,Romania), accession countries (Turkey) and the countries recipient of developmentfunds (Egypt, Tanzania, Tunisia). The data covers over a decade of structuraland development funds, and the findings show the challenges to changing governanceacross borders, the different paths that each country has experiencedand suggest avenues of reforming development aid for improving governance.

This last title in the series covers the most important findings of the five yearsEU sponsored ANTICORRP project dealing with corruption and organized crime.How prone to corruption are EU funds? Has EU managed to improve governancein the countries that it assists? Using the new index of public integrity and avariety of other tools created in the project this issue looks at how EU funds andnorms affected old member states (like Spain), new member states (Slovakia,Romania), accession countries (Turkey) and the countries recipient of developmentfunds (Egypt, Tanzania, Tunisia). The data covers over a decade of structuraland development funds, and the findings show the challenges to changing governanceacross borders, the different paths that each country has experiencedand suggest avenues of reforming development aid for improving governance.