Suchergebnisse
Filter
Format
Medientyp
Sprache
Weitere Sprachen
Jahre
5729 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Working paper
Partisanship and Democratization
In: Journal of east Asian studies, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 323-343
ISSN: 2234-6643
How do attachments to political parties among the mass publics of East Asia affect the process of democratization in the region? Analyses of the East Asia Barometer surveys reveal that partisanship motivates East Asians to endorse the democratic performance of their political system and embrace democracy as the best possible system of government. These findings accord, by and large, with the socialization, cognitive dissonance, and rational choice theories of partisanship.
Partisanship in East Asia
In: Journal of east Asian studies, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 275-293
ISSN: 1598-2408
Partisanship and Democratization
In: Journal of east Asian studies, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 323-343
ISSN: 1598-2408
The Normative Value of Partisanship: When and Why Partisanship Matters
In: Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, Band 66, Heft 1, S. 192-208
ISSN: 1467-9248
Recent work on partisanship has highlighted the role of political parties in rendering democracy and justice widely accessible to citizens. In these recent works, a distinction is drawn between a contemporary conception of partisanship that focuses on fidelity to political parties and a classic conception that emphasises the importance of a civic ethos of active political engagement. I argue that these two conceptions of partisanship are not so disparate if we focus on the role of political parties in promoting civic commitment and contestation. More specifically, I show how a normative account of partisanship can contribute to a defence of a civic ethos of political commitment. I then argue that commitment leads to contestation among both partisans and non-partisans, and that polities lacking active contestation of political commitments are in one significant respect less well off than those societies where there is such contestation.
Partisanship and plane crashes: can partisanship drive conspiratorial beliefs?
In: East European politics, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 254-280
ISSN: 2159-9173
Partisanship in a Social Setting
In: American journal of political science, Band 58, Heft 3, S. 687-704
ISSN: 1540-5907
No factor appears more powerful in explaining how individuals evaluate political information and form political preferences than partisanship. Yet, virtually all work on the effects of partisanship on preference formation neglects the crucial role of social settings. In this study, I examine how social settings can fundamentally change the influence of partisanship on preferences. I demonstrate that, in fact, social settings exert an independent influence over preference formation—one that is even larger than the influence of partisan ambivalence. The central implication of these findings is that, going forward, we cannot fully explore how citizens apply their partisanship in evaluating political information without also accounting for the social settings in which individuals find themselves.
Partisanship and Political Cognition
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"Partisanship and Political Cognition" published on by Oxford University Press.
Ethnic Partisanship in Ethiopia
In: Nationalism & ethnic politics, Band 16, Heft 3-4, S. 290-310
ISSN: 1557-2986
Ethnic Partisanship in Ethiopia
In: Nationalism and ethnic politics, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 290-311
ISSN: 1353-7113
Federalism and Partisanship
In: Publius: the journal of federalism, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 57-57
ISSN: 0048-5950
Policy or Partisanship?
In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift: PVS : German political science quarterly, Band 51, Heft 2, S. 223-250
ISSN: 0032-3470
Partisanship and Ideology
In: Political Culture in Contemporary Britain, S. 295-319
Partisanship and Political Obligation
In: Politics, Band 32, Heft 3, S. 153-161
ISSN: 1467-9256
Political parties have generally been disregarded in the literature on political obligation. In this article I argue that, regardless of whether ordinary citizens or residents of a polity have any political obligations, partisanship generates its own kind of political obligations. Participating in party politics qua party members, supporters, activists or even mere voters produces benefits that generate corresponding and proportionate political obligations for those who enjoy them. The political obligations of partisans are easier to justify than those of ordinary citizens as the conditions under which the benefits of partisanship can be rendered excludable are easier to obtain.
Partisanship in the #MeToo Era
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 44-61
ISSN: 1541-0986
Partisanship structures mass politics by shaping the votes, policy views, and political perceptions of ordinary people. Even so, substantial shifts in partisanship can occur when elites signal clear differences on a political issue and attentive citizens update their views of party reputations. Mismatched partisans who strongly care about the issue respond by changing parties in a process of "issue evolution" when writ large. Others simply update their views to match their party in a "conflict extension" process. We build on these models by integrating the largely separate research strands of party issue ownership. Using sexual misconduct as a critical case study, we argue that partisan change can occur rapidly when party elites move strategically to take ownership of an issue, thereby clarifying differences between the parties. Using a quasi-experiment, a survey experiment, and data from dozens of national surveys, we find recent, rapid shifts in party reputations on #MeToo, views of the issue, party votes, and broader party support.