Scaling the Patent System
In: NYU Annual Survey of American Law, Band 68, S. 289
1634 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: NYU Annual Survey of American Law, Band 68, S. 289
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: Challenge: the magazine of economic affairs, Band 10, Heft 4, S. 24-27
ISSN: 1558-1489
In: Government information quarterly: an international journal of policies, resources, services and practices, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 101559
ISSN: 0740-624X
SSRN
Working paper
The present paper discusses the role of quality in patent systems from the perspective of patent offices'behavior and organization. After documenting original stylized facts, the paper presents a model in which patent offices set patent fees and the quality level of their examination processes. Various objectives of patent offices' governors are considered. We show that the quality of the patent system is maximal for the patent offices that maximises either the social welfare or its own profit. Quality is lower for the self-funded patent office maximizing the number of patent applications and even smaller for the self-funded patent office maximizing the number of granted patents. A labor union improves examination quality and may compensate for the potentialy inappropriate objectives of patent office management. ; info:eu-repo/semantics/published
BASE
In: Economic affairs: journal of the Institute of Economic Affairs, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 39-43
ISSN: 1468-0270
An ideal patent system balances the returns to inventors and the dissemination of new technologies. This article examines legal policy instruments ‐ encompassing duration, scope and strength of patent protection, as well as invention disclosure and novelty requirements ‐ and R&D subsidies that help sustain growth in GDP. The paper studies the issues associated with designing an effective patent system, surveys the industrial property literature and delineates the focal points of debate among researchers and policy‐makers.
In: Studies of the Oxford Institute of European and comparative law volume 19
"The purpose of this book is to explore the key substantive, methodological, and institutional issues raised by the proposed EU unitary patent system contained in EU Regulations 1257/2012 and 1260/2012, and the Unified Patent Court Agreement 2013. The originality of this work lies in its uniquely broad approach, taking seven different (historical, constitutional, international, competition, economic, institutional, and forward-looking) perspectives on the proposed EU patent system. This means that the book offers a multi-authored and all round appraisal of the proposed unitary system from experts in patent law, EU constitutional law, private international law, competition law, and economics, as well as leading figures from the worlds of legal practice, the bench, and the European Patent Office. The unitary patent system raises issues of foundational importance in the fields of patent and intellectual property law, EU law and legal harmonization, which it is the purpose of the book to engage with. This is a work which will enjoy wide and enduring interest among academics, policy makers and decision makers/practitioners working in patent law, intellectual property law, legal harmonization, and EU law."--Bloomsbury Publishing
In: Review of international political economy, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 169-180
ISSN: 1466-4526
In: Far Eastern affairs: a Russian journal on China, Japan and Asia-Pacific Region ; a quarterly publication of the Institute for Far Eastern Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Heft 1, S. 111-118
ISSN: 0206-149X
The Patent Law of the PRC went into force on April 1, 1985. This law is the legal basis of the patent system that is being set up in the country. The study is an overview of the patent system in the PRC. The import of the advanced equipment and technology can be enhanced by the patent system. Sharply increased purchases of licenses by China since the early 1980s. The duration of patents for invention. Co-operation with other countries developed by the country's Patent Agency. (DÜI-Sen)
World Affairs Online
In: 89 Southern Cal. L. Rev. 4 (2016)
SSRN
In: (2012) 34(4) European Intellectual Property Review
SSRN
SSRN