Suchergebnisse

AbstractPatriarchy is more than just "sexism." It is a social formation of male‐gendered power with a particular structure that can be found with striking regularity in many different arenas of social life, from small‐scale contexts like the family, kin groups, and gangs, up through larger institutional contexts like the police, the military, organized religion, the state, and more. At the same time, patriarchy never stands alone, and always exists in complex intersections with other forms of power. In this article, I look at patriarchy from both points of view—that is, from both an exclusively gendered perspective, and from a perspective in which patriarchy cannot be divorced from white supremacy, normative heterosexuality, and normative able‐bodiedness. Finally I briefly consider contemporary right‐wing extremist (fascist) politics, in which the toxic intersectional brew of patriarchy, white supremacy, heteronormativity, and ideologies of bodily perfection are mobilized in pursuit of mass political control and domination.

The concept `patriarchy', while being vital for feminist analysis, has been criticised for not being able to deal with historical and cross-cultural variation in the forms of women's subordination. This paper presents a new way of theorising patriarchy to meet these objections; one which is flexible enough to take account of its various forms, but rigorous enough to be an effective tool for analysis. It leaves behind base-superstructure models of patriarchy in which there is only one base, which have led to many of the rigidities which have been identified, arguing instead for a model of patriarchy as six partially-interdependent structures. The paper concludes with a discussion of the different forms of patriarchy in recent British history.

Les théories féministes ont assigné des significations variées au concept de 'patriarchié'. Dans cet article, j'identifie deux conceptualisations principales de 'patriarchie' que ľon retrouve dans la littérature: 1/ patriarchie en tant que dominance male, une caractéristique de la société; et 2/ patriarchie en tant que système autonome. La deuxième école de pensée a spécifié un concept de système 'sex/gender' qui représente un progrès théorique considérable. Je critique certains usages représentatifs de 'patriarchie' pour leur réductionnisme, et en particulier pour leur compréhension superficielle de la structure sociale et leur postulat ?un désir de pouvoir inné chez les hommes. Si ľon veut donner au concept de 'patriarchie' la moindre puissance analytique, son référent devra être constitué de ľintégration des processus de reproduction générationnelle, de reproduction des individus dans leur vie quotidienne au moyen du travail domestique et matemel, et de la production ?idéologie et ?identité sexées. Plus généralement, la compréhension de ľinégalité entre les sexes requiert que nos objets ?analyse incluent les niveaux structurel et individuel.This paper examines the different meanings that feminist theorists have given to the concept of 'patriarchy.' Two major conceptualizations appear in the literature: 1/ patriarchy as male dominance, a characteristic of society; and 2/ partriarchy as an autonomous system. Within the second school of thought, the specification of a 'sex/gender system' represents an important theoretical advance. I criticize representative treatments of 'patriarchy' for their reductionism, especially their crude understanding of social structure and their assumption of an innate male desire for power. I argue that if the concept of 'patriarchy' is to be given analytical depth, then its referent must be the integrated processes of generational reproduction, the reproduction of individuals in their daily lives through housework and motherwork, and the production of gender identity and ideology. More broadly, an understanding of gender inequality requires analysis both at the level of social structure and at the level of the individual.

"Motherhood in Patriarchy" pioneers the argument that the current Western understanding of motherhood is a patriarchal one based on a long historical tradition of subjection and institutionalization. The book makes an important contribution to women's studies on reproduction, feminist theory, motherhood and welfare politics, and offers alternative perspectives.

Argues that patriarchy is the reason that human civilization has not succumbed to fertility declines & is resurging. The implications of the relationship between patriarchy, population, and power are looked at. The characteristics of patriarchal societies are identified before looking at some of the system's pitfalls. With the fall of patriarchy, it is contended that civilization does not fail, but rather transforms. Further, societies that are the most secular & most generous with underfunded welfare states are most prone to religious revivals & reemergence of the patriarchal family.

1948 and 1989 were turning points in Czech society. In forty years under communism, men and women were equalized by the regime's totalitarianism and egalitarianism. I argue that these forces, as well as concomitant changes in the public and private spheres, dictate that women's situation should not be interpreted in terms of patriarchy. Women's issues and the problem of patriarchy, which under communism seemed irrelevant in Czech society, may now come to the fore because the postcommunist period requires women to undertake an essential rethinking of their identity.

Abstract
In considering patriarchy as potentially institutional and as a characteristic also of contemporary Western societies, a fundamental issue concerns how to make sense of largely informal institutions to begin with. Traditional accounts of institutions have often focused on formalized ones. It is argued here, however, that the principal idea behind one commonly accepted conception of institutions can be developed in a way that better facilitates an explication of informal institutions. When applied to the phenomenon of patriarchy, such an approach can then also allow us to ontologically make sense of gray areas and hierarchies of authority, as well as the intersectionality of social positions.

Argues that patriarchy is the reason that human civilization has not succumbed to fertility declines & is resurging. The implications of the relationship between patriarchy, population, and power are looked at. The characteristics of patriarchal societies are identified before looking at some of the system's pitfalls. With the fall of patriarchy, it is contended that civilization does not fail, but rather transforms. Further, societies that are the most secular & most generous with underfunded welfare states are most prone to religious revivals & reemergence of the patriarchal family.