Suchergebnisse

Wali Nanggroe Institution is an institution of cultural authority as the unifier of the people that is independent, authoritative, and has the authority to develop and oversee the implementation of the life, adat (custom), language, the award of titles and honors, and adat rites. This research was conducted in Banda Aceh city using a qualitative method. The concept used was Wali Nanggroe, the theories of strategy, conflict resolution, and political communication theories to resolve local conflicts and analyze Wali Nanggroe neutrality in resolving conflicts in Aceh. The data were obtained by observation technique and interview (questionnaires and voice records). The results found that the Wali Nanggroe Institution does not implement a strategy in resolving conflicts both local conflicts and other conflicts in local institutions. Also, Wali Nanggroe does not hold political communication to resolve the conflicts. Besides, as a mediator, Wali Nanggroe is unfair to resolve the conflicts among local institutions due to some causes; emotional attachment between Wali Nanggroe and Members of Parliament at Aceh Provincial House of Representatives (DPRA) from Aceh Party Faction, tend to maintain the reign of Wali Nanggroe, and procedural problems in Wali Nanggroe election. ; Lembaga Wali Nanggroe adalah lembaga kepemimpinan adat sebagai pemersatu masyarakat yang independen, berwibawa, dan berwenang membina dan mengawasi penyelenggaraan kehidupan lembaga-lembaga adat, adat istiadat, bahasa dan pemberian gelar/derajat, dan upacara-upacara adat lainnya. Penelitian ini dilakukan di kota Banda Aceh dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif. Konsep yang digunakan adalah Wali Nanggroe, teori strategi, resolusi konflik, dan teori komunikasi politik untuk menyelesaikan konflik lokal dan menganalisis netralitas Wali Nanggroe dalam menyelesaikan konflik di Aceh. Data diperoleh dengan teknik observasi dan wawancara (kuesioner dan rekaman suara). Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa Lembaga Wali Nanggroe tidak menerapkan strategi resolusi konflik baik konflik lokal maupun konflik lain di kelembagaan lokal. Selain itu, Wali Nanggroe tidak melakukan komunikasi politik untuk menyelesaikan konflik. Selain itu, sebagai mediator, Wali Nanggroe kurang adil dalam menyelesaikan konflik antar lembaga lokal karena beberapa sebab; keterikatan emosional antara Wali Nanggroe dengan anggota DPR Aceh dari Fraksi Partai Aceh, cenderung mempertahankan kekuasaan Wali Nanggroe, dan masalah prosedural dalam pemilihan Wali Nanggroe.

This study aims to analyze and describe the public participation level and the factors supporting and inhibiting public participation in maintaining peace and order in Imandi Village. This research uses a descriptive qualitative research method. This research was located in Imandi Village, East Dumoga Subdistrict, Bolaang Mongondow Regency, North Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. The results showed that: 1) The Imandi Village community's participation is still not well implemented. Therefore, it will be better to maintain public peace and order in the village if it starts from individuals as small community units. It allows the realization of solidarity, which will significantly affect group members or community members in public peace and order implementation. 2) Efforts to motivate people to participate through Mapalus (mutual assistance activities) need leaders who can be role models. Village community leaders can be the key motivator in mutual assistance activities, but the government's participation is required. (3) The village government and its apparatus must continue to managing and fostering community members, especially in multicultural communities, to prevent the disruption of public peace and order. ; Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mendeskripsikan tingkat partisipasi masyarakat serta faktor-faktor pendukung dan penghambat partisipasi masyarakat dalam menjaga ketentraman dan ketertiban di Desa Imandi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Penelitian ini berlokasi di Desa Imandi, Kecamatan Dumoga Timur, Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow, Provinsi Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Peran serta masyarakat Desa Imandi masih belum terlaksana dengan baik. Oleh karena itu, akan lebih baik untuk menjaga ketentraman dan ketertiban umum di desa jika dimulai dari individu-individu sebagai kesatuan masyarakat kecil. Hal ini memungkinkan terwujudnya solidaritas, yang secara signifikan akan mempengaruhi anggota kelompok atau anggota masyarakat dalam pelaksanaan ketentraman dan ketertiban umum. 2) Upaya memotivasi masyarakat untuk berpartisipasi melalui Mapalus (kegiatan gotong royong) membutuhkan pemimpin yang dapat menjadi panutan. Tokoh masyarakat desa dapat menjadi motivator dalam kegiatan gotong royong, namun diperlukan peran serta pemerintah. (3) Pemerintah desa dan perangkatnya harus terus membina dan memberdayakan masyarakat, khususnya dalam masyarakat multikultural, untuk mencegah terganggunya ketentraman dan ketertiban umum.

The rural population is a basic capital for national development, owned by the people and the Indonesian nation. In the constitutional structure of the Republic of Indonesia, the Village has developed in various forms and is obliged to be protected and empowered to be strong, advanced, and democratic and democratic so as to carry out governance and development towards a just, prosperous and prosperous society. The involvement of the Village Head in resolving conflicts within rural communities has made the writer interested in studying the nature of cases out of court settlement by the Village Head against the village community and the reformulation of legal policies in implementing the nature of the settlement of a non-court problem. The approach used in this research is statute approach, historical approach, and conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of this study states that solving a problem that occurs in the village by placing the Village Head as a peace judge is a form of discretion / policy of the executive in order to realize public service for the community. In other words because it is a discretion, it certainly follows the laws and regulations that state the limits of it.

Burundi is one of the poorest countries in the world that suffered from prolonged ethnic conflict. Conflict between Hutu and Tutsi has brought this country into genocide on 1972 and 1993 that led into 12 years of civil war. Peacemaking effort to end violent conflict in Burundi has gone through three main phases involving regional and international organisations. As result of this peace process, the parties have signed Arusha Peace and Reconciliation Agreement on 28 August 2000. This agreement directly addressed the issue of ethnicity in Burundi and devised a power- sharing arrangement. However, peace is a fragile thing so it's important to build strong foundation for ensuring its sustainability. Peacebuilding efforts are necessary to bring post-conflict recovery and prevent the outbreak of civil war in the future. The role of international community is also needed to support post-conflict peace-building in Burundi.

Multi etnisitas Indonesia dan potensi konflik di dalamnya / Misbah Zulfa Elizabeth -- Konflik antar agama / Peter Suwarno -- Gerakan fundamentalisme dan konflik agama / Didin Nurul Rosidin -- Peran negara dalam kebebasan beragama dan resolusi atas konflik bernuansa agama / Musahadi H.A.M. -- Mediasi dan konflik agama di Indonesia / Abu Hafsin -- Mediasi dan konflik agama di Indonesia / Daniel Nuhamara -- Mediasi peradilan di Indonesia / Achmad Gunaryo -- Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa melalui mediasi / Muhammad Saifullah -- Peace building melalui pendidikan multikultural / Syamsul Ma'arif -- Peace building melalui pengembangan format keberagamaan inklusif dan dialogis / Sholihan.

Cakrawala : Jurnal Penelitian Sosial. Vol. 5, No. 1, Juni 2016, p. 99-117 ; In the history of UN peace operations, East Timor is one of the peace operations that are considered successful. The role played by the United Nations not only focus on peacemaking efforts with the mediator between Indonesia and Timor Leste freedom fighters, but also in peacekeeping and peacebuilding programs such as peacekeeping operations and the development of economic, political, social and cultural. It is worth noting that the success achieved was due to the revolutionary strategy to evolve the role of the United Nations which is associated in an ad hoc institution with the specific mandate of these institutions. The formation of an ad hoc institution that makes the implementation of the program becomes more focused. Politically, these institutions have managed to map the needs, plans and steps needed to create peace in East Timor. Indeed the success of the strategy process and the United Nations in East Timor could be a recommendation for a model United Nations peacekeeping operation in the world.

The Nagorno Karabakh conflict is a conflict over territorial disputes that is synonymous with inter-Azerbaijan strife that adheres to the principle of integrating its territory in Nagorno Karabakh and Armenia which support the Nagorno Karabakh region and ethnic Armenians who are in it for independence from Azerbaijan. The dynamics of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia continue to unfold, and there has never been a sustainable peace agreement between the two parties in dispute since the peace agreement Bishkek (Bishkek Protocol) 1994. Along with the dynamics of the battle, Russia has a very active role in the mediation and peace-building process between the two parties in conflict. Russia's position as mediator is carried out within the official framework of the OSCE Minsk Group and in the personal initiation of the state in the medium of the trilateral meeting. This research will describe the dynamics of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict in the period 2008-2016 along with efforts to resolve disputes under the Russian role. Keywords : Nagorno Karabakh Conflict, Russia, Mediation, and Contigency Model