Suchergebnisse

International audience ; "I order the suspension of the parliamentary, administrative and supervisory functions of the Congress of People's Deputies and the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation. The Constitution. and legislation. will remain in force to the extent that they do not conflict with this Decree". Moscow, Kremlin, 21 September 1993, 8pm, Presidential Decree (Ukaz) n° 1400.Presented by some as a way out of the intractable conflict which had opposed the President and Parliament for months, denounced by others as a coup, Boris Yeltsin's decree provoked a crisis which would last fourteen days, during which political conflict turned into violent confrontation. From 21 September to 4 October 1993, Russia experienced a major political crisis. In response to Yeltsin's Ukaz, Members of Parliament supported by General Rutskoi, Russian Vice-President, met in extraordinary session, refused to comply with the presidential decision, occupied Parliament (the White House) and held out against the security forces. Protests were organised in the city: Yeltsin's supporters gathered near the Moscow Soviet (Mossovet), those supporting the deputies assembled near the White House. The political confrontation ended with the storming of Parliament by the army on 4 October, under the orders of the President, and the arrests of the rebel deputies and their supporters. The toll: more than 150 dead and 400 injured.Twenty years after October 1993, this Conference aims to propose a sociological analysis of this crucial but neglected political crisis. To this end, it seeks to question the official version of the event, which was principally the work of the victors, who imposed their vision of the confrontation and its consequences, in particular concerning the institutional outcomes. The Conference also restores the place of alternative accounts and memories. It analyses the diverse individual and collective trajectories of actors of the period. Focussing on the period prior to the conflict, its development and its consequences, the Conference explores both the winners and the losers of the conflict, its active participants and its observers. Particular attention is paid to the issue of the explosion of violence, its effects on the crisis and its outcome. ; « Je décrète la suspension des fonctions législatives, administratives et de contrôle du Congrès des députés du peuple et du Soviet suprême de la Fédération de Russie. (…) La Constitution (…) et la législation (…) restent en vigueur dans la mesure où elles ne contredisent pas le présent Décret ». Moscou, Kremlin, 21 septembre 1993, 20 heures, Ukaz du Président n° 1400.Présenté par les uns comme un moyen de sortir du conflit insoluble qui oppose le Président au Parlement depuis des mois, dénoncé par les autres comme un coup de force, ce décret de B. Eltsine ouvre la voie à une crise qui durera quatorze jours au cours desquels le conflit politique basculera dans l'affrontement violent. Du 21 septembre au 4 octobre 1993, la Russie connaît une crise politique majeure. En réponse à l'ukaz de B. Eltsine, les députés soutenus par le général Routskoï, Vice-président de la Russie, se réunissent en session extraordinaire, refusent de se soumettre à la décision présidentielle, s'enferment au Parlement (Maison Blanche) et tiennent le siège contre les forces de l'ordre. Des manifestations sont organisées dans la ville : les partisans d'Eltsine se réunissent près du Soviet de Moscou (Mossovet), ceux des députés près de la Maison Blanche. L'affrontement politique se conclut par le bombardement du Parlement par l'armée le 4 octobre sur ordre du Président et par l'arrestation des députés insoumis et de leurs partisans. Bilan : plus de 150 morts et 400 blessés.Vingt ans après octobre 1993, le colloque a pour objectif de proposer une sociologie de cette crise politique cruciale mais aujourd'hui négligée. Dans cette perspective, il vise à interroger le récit officiel de l'événement, œuvre avant tout des vainqueurs dont la vision de l'affrontement et de ses conséquences, notamment institutionnelles, s'est imposée. Le colloque souhaite redonner place à des récits et des souvenirs alternatifs. Il entend analyser dans leur diversité les trajectoires individuelles et collectives des acteurs de l'époque. Portant sur la période précédant le conflit, sur son déroulement puis sur ses conséquences, il s'intéresse tant aux vainqueurs qu'aux perdants du conflit, à ses participants engagés et à ses observateurs. Une attention particulière est accordée à la question du surgissement de la violence et de ses effets sur la crise et son dénouement. ; «… Постановляю прервать осуществление законодательной, распорядительной и контрольной функций Съездом народных депутатов Российской Федерации и Верховным Советом Российской Федерации. (…) Конституция (…), законодательство (…) продолжают действовать в части, не противоречащей настоящему Указу». Москва, Кремль, 21 сентября 1993 г., 20.00, Указ Президента, № 1400.Этот указ Бориса Ельцина, который одни представляют как единственный способ выйти из многомесячного неразрешимого конфликта между президентом и парламентом, а другие обличают как акт насилия, спровоцировал продлившийся 14 дней кризис, в ходе которого политическое противостояние переросло в вооруженный конфликт. С 21 сентября по 4 октября 1993 г. Россия пребывала в состоянии острейшего политического кризиса. В ответ на указ Ельцина депутаты, поддержанные вице-президентом России генералом Руцким, собрались на экстренное заседание, отказались подчиняться президентскому решению, забаррикадировались в Белом Доме и оказались в осаде. В городе начались демонстрации: сторонники Ельцина стали собираться у Моссовета, сторонники Парламента – у Белого Дома. Политическое противостояние закончилось 4 октября обстрелом Парламента силами армии, действовавшей по приказу президента, и арестом мятежных депутатов и их сторонников. Итоги: более 150 погибших и 400 раненых. Спустя двадцать лет после октября 1993 г. организаторы конференции предлагают провести социологический анализ этого важнейшего политического кризиса, о котором сегодня вспоминают так редко. Цель встречи – рассмотреть официальную версию событий, созданную победителями, которые смогли утвердить свое видение сути и последствий (прежде всего, в институциональной сфере) октябрьских событий. Поэтому на конференции прозвучали также и альтернативные воспоминания и интерпретации. Ее участники анализируют все разнообразие личных и коллективных траекторий политических акторов эпохи, рассматривают период, предшествовавший конфликту, сам его ход и последствия. В центре внимания стоят как победители, так и побежденные, как вовлеченные участники, так и наблюдатели. Особое внимание уделяется переходу к насилию и его влиянию на развертывание кризиса, а потом на его разрешение.

Ideas presented in the article philosophers of classical type of scientific knowledge about the nature and forms of interaction between people in society so far have their enduring significance. In the depths of the classical approaches in social philosophy were formulated system of ideas, samples, determining the comparison and understanding of the basic aspects and spheres of life: nature, society, people's lives, their work, knowledge, ideals and values. Accordingly, it appears, and the content of public relations and relations of people as structure based on a set of mandatory guidelines. At the same time, we see that in each of these approaches provides a set of questions, the answers to which have to find a new problem field, the drop in current scientific debates.

International audience ; "I order the suspension of the parliamentary, administrative and supervisory functions of the Congress of People's Deputies and the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation. The Constitution. and legislation. will remain in force to the extent that they do not conflict with this Decree". Moscow, Kremlin, 21 September 1993, 8pm, Presidential Decree (Ukaz) n° 1400.Presented by some as a way out of the intractable conflict which had opposed the President and Parliament for months, denounced by others as a coup, Boris Yeltsin's decree provoked a crisis which would last fourteen days, during which political conflict turned into violent confrontation. From 21 September to 4 October 1993, Russia experienced a major political crisis. In response to Yeltsin's Ukaz, Members of Parliament supported by General Rutskoi, Russian Vice-President, met in extraordinary session, refused to comply with the presidential decision, occupied Parliament (the White House) and held out against the security forces. Protests were organised in the city: Yeltsin's supporters gathered near the Moscow Soviet (Mossovet), those supporting the deputies assembled near the White House. The political confrontation ended with the storming of Parliament by the army on 4 October, under the orders of the President, and the arrests of the rebel deputies and their supporters. The toll: more than 150 dead and 400 injured.Twenty years after October 1993, this Conference aims to propose a sociological analysis of this crucial but neglected political crisis. To this end, it seeks to question the official version of the event, which was principally the work of the victors, who imposed their vision of the confrontation and its consequences, in particular concerning the institutional outcomes. The Conference also restores the place of alternative accounts and memories. It analyses the diverse individual and collective trajectories of actors of the period. Focussing on the period prior to the conflict, its development and its consequences, ...

International audience ; "I order the suspension of the parliamentary, administrative and supervisory functions of the Congress of People's Deputies and the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation. The Constitution. and legislation. will remain in force to the extent that they do not conflict with this Decree". Moscow, Kremlin, 21 September 1993, 8pm, Presidential Decree (Ukaz) n° 1400.Presented by some as a way out of the intractable conflict which had opposed the President and Parliament for months, denounced by others as a coup, Boris Yeltsin's decree provoked a crisis which would last fourteen days, during which political conflict turned into violent confrontation. From 21 September to 4 October 1993, Russia experienced a major political crisis. In response to Yeltsin's Ukaz, Members of Parliament supported by General Rutskoi, Russian Vice-President, met in extraordinary session, refused to comply with the presidential decision, occupied Parliament (the White House) and held out against the security forces. Protests were organised in the city: Yeltsin's supporters gathered near the Moscow Soviet (Mossovet), those supporting the deputies assembled near the White House. The political confrontation ended with the storming of Parliament by the army on 4 October, under the orders of the President, and the arrests of the rebel deputies and their supporters. The toll: more than 150 dead and 400 injured.Twenty years after October 1993, this Conference aims to propose a sociological analysis of this crucial but neglected political crisis. To this end, it seeks to question the official version of the event, which was principally the work of the victors, who imposed their vision of the confrontation and its consequences, in particular concerning the institutional outcomes. The Conference also restores the place of alternative accounts and memories. It analyses the diverse individual and collective trajectories of actors of the period. Focussing on the period prior to the conflict, its development and its consequences, ...

Semantic maintenance of the concept "globalization" is examined, its wide and
narrow interpretations. It becomes firmly established that global integration is the
quantitative state of globalization, indicative on the scale of what be going on in society changes, and universalization is the description of the high-quality state of globalization. Processes of modernisation, internationalization, transnatonalization and
liberalization are methods, relations, structures and principles which accompany the
process of rapprochement of societies in global unit. Modern globalization on the
stage of technogenesis presents not simply socio-economic and socio-biospheric
process, and more vast is a technogenic socio-biospheric process of co-operation of
technogenic society, its technosphere and transformed biosphere.

par N. S. Vsévolojsky ; Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- Russ. 167 l-1

par N. S. Vsévolojsky ; Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- Russ. 167 l-2

This article reveals the socio-psychological essence of the social determinants of typical syndromes of social work objects. It analyzes the possibilities of a socio-psychological approach to understanding the nature of these phenomena. It reveals such concepts as quality of life, typical negative socio-psychological phenomena, including social maladjustment, socially stressful situation, social fears and other phenomena. It also examines the practice of overcoming socially destructive phenomena, in particular, fears.

The article deals with the problem of civil education in Gessen's social phylosophy. Opportunities and the meaning of the civil education concept of S.I. Gessen are reviewed with the purpose of individual's forming and development in the modern philosophy of education. The importance of world view are considered as the main value of civil education.

The constancy of research interest in the content and forms of interaction between people in the society due to the role of the communication process and communication in the life of people. Most significantly, this role becomes in moments of reconciling work and interests of individuals, communities and groups; in the process of establishing, maintaining and expanding social connections and relations. Presented in the article ideas and concepts ancient thinkers and philosophers of the Middle Ages about the nature and forms of interaction of people in society are shown as supporting the idea of revealing the content of social communication, because they have their fundamental importance in the social and philosophical discourse on the analysis of forms of social interaction between individuals, social groups and society as a whole.

The article considers social work as a specific socio-cultural mechanism that promotes positive social changes and harmonious social development. Some approaches to defining the essence of the concept and the role of social work in modern reality are presented. The main levels of social work implementation — individual, group and community one — are considered. It is emphasized that in the conditions of modern reality, there is a need to realize the potential of social work.