Suchergebnisse

Die Freireligiöse Gemeinde Breslau und ihre Geschichte / Jochen Enders -- Wer war Johannes Ronge? / Renate Bauer -- Weltanschauung und Philosophie bei Johannes Ronge (1813-1887) / Peter Jäckel -- Nees von Esenbeck, Prof. Dr. Christian Gottfried Daniel (1776-1858) / Eckhart Pilick -- Emanzipiert euch! : die freireligiöse Bewegung und ihr Einsatz für Frauen und ihre Rechte / Renate Bauer -- Human erziehen : das neue Menschenbild der freireliogiösen Bewegung / Renate Bauer -- Kontake zwischen Polen und Breslaus religiösen end Freidenkern / Jochen Enders -- Dr. Theodor Hofferichter (1815-1886) / Pia Oberacker -- Gustav Tschirn (1865-1931) / Heinrich Keipp -- Die freireligiöse Bewegung nach 1945 : ein Ausblick / Renate Bauer -- Freidenker in Breslau nach 1945 / Jacek Tabisz

Nowadays we observe the popularization of codes addressed to various social groups. It is reasonable to search for answers to questions about the conditions of their construction and the possibility of their practical use. This article presents a critical review of the literature in the field of positions specifically related to the issue of codification of professional ethics. In the first place the importance attributed to the concept of an ethical code and basic ethical positions are discussed. The rest of the paper contains an analysis of the supporters and opponents of codification standards arguments.

The popularisation of code elaboration addressed to various social groups is one of the features of the modern world. However, among researchers of this phenomenon a full consensus on the moral validity and usefulness of this activity does not exist. The article closely reviews the literature with regard to the reasons for the creation of a moderate position on the codification of ethical standards. The essay brings closer the main concepts of ethical codes and positions for their adoption and rejection. Attention is paid to ways of increasing the effectiveness of codes and the ethical decision-making procedure in a manner that undermines supporters and opponents of codification approaches.