Suchergebnisse

The use of performance measurement system in the public sector (PMS) has become a panacea in addressing an inefficient bureaucracy that fails to meet the citizen satisfaction by its lethargic service delivery. It has introduced a way for public managers to better generate outcome policy into a concrete-measurable actions. While many countries already demonstrates the benefit of using the system, Indonesia remain struggle in implementing the ideal of performance management particularly in the context of local government that usually lacking of adequate capacity and sources. Despite the continuous support by central government, the diverse of socio-environmental context hinder local government to fully implements of SAKIP. This paper sought to portray the implementation and challenges that is faced by one local government agencies in Sukabumi, West Java Indonesia in implementing Indonesian public performance management system (SAKIP). This paper is using qualitative approach by conducting structured interview to key informants. The results showed that organizational variables have been able to accommodate the implementation of SAKIP policy through units formed specifically in organizational structure and governance regulations, organizational interpretation variables are still necessary to improve the dissemination of policy information to all levels of employees, application variables where the implementation of policies are still experiencing constraints, especially in planning and evaluation, as well as a lack of specific strategies in improving organizational performance. This paper reinforces the results of previous studies related with performance management system in Indonesian local government that its implementation has not been yet showing their best result.

The consistency between planning and budgeting is important because it is a marker for local governments in assessing the performance of all government programs and activities, whether they are running well and according to the goals set. The difference in consistency in the Pangkalpinang City Government occurs from year to year. Still, there is a commitment from the Regional Head to build consistency between planning and budgeting to realize community welfare. This research has a purpose: to find out and analyze how the consistency between planning and budgeting in the 2018 to 2020 fiscal year is through an analysis of the planning process and the budgeting process to see what factors support this consistency. The research method used uses a qualitative approach and analysis through the Interactive Model of Miles and Huberman. The results obtained from the research are planning and budgeting process in the Pangkalpinang City Government is still not consistent. The research locus is at the Regional Development Planning and Research Agency of the Pangkalpinang City, Regional Finance Agency of Pangkalpinang City, and Regional House of Representatives Budget Agency of Pangkalpinang City. Each year, the consistency that occurs is different in the Regional Government Work Plan (Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Daerah or RKPD). The highest consistency is found at the end of the Regional Medium-Term Development Plan (Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah or RPJMD), which in this research falls on the 2018 Regional Government Work Plan (RKPD). ; Konsistensi yang terjadi antara perencanaan dan penganggaran menjadi hal yang penting untuk diperhatikan karena menjadi penanda bagi pemerintah daerah dalam menilai kinerja seluruh program dan kegiatan pemerintah, apakah berjalan dengan baik dan sesuai dengan tujuan yang telah ditetapkan. Perbedaan konsistensi di Pemerintah Kota Pangkalpinang terjadi dari tahun ke tahun. Namun tetap ada komitmen dari Kepala Daerah untuk membangun konsistensi antara perencanaan dan penganggaran untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan: untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis bagaimana konsistensi antara perencanaan dan penganggaran pada tahun anggaran 2018 hingga 2020 melalui analisis proses perencanaan dan proses penganggaran untuk melihat faktor-faktor apa saja yang mendukung konsistensi tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan analisis melalui Model Interaktif Miles dan Huberman. Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian adalah proses dan penganggaran di Pemerintah Kota Pangkalpinang masih belum konsisten. Lokus penelitian berada di Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan dan Penelitian Pengembangan Daerah Kota Pangkalpinang, Badan Keuangan Daerah Kota Pangkalpinang dan Badan Anggaran DPRD Kota Pangkalpinang. Konsistensi yang terjadi berbeda pada setiap tahun Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Daerah (RKPD). Konsistensi tertinggi terdapat pada bagian akhir Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD) yang dalam penelitian ini jatuh pada Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Daerah (RKPD) tahun 2018.

학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 환경계획학과, 2012. 2. 전상인. ; 경주지역의 고도보존법 개정과정 사례는 사회구조의 변화에 따른 문제점과 갈등의 원인을 공공부문과 시민들이 함께 인식하고, 다양한 이해관계자들이 참여와 협력을 통한 상호작용으로 합의를 도출한 협력적 계획사례로 평가할 수 있다. 따라서 경주사례를 협력적 계획의 구성요소를 통해 분석해 보는 과정은, 지방 환경에서 협력적 계획이론의 적합성과 현실에서의 적용에 있어 발생하는 문제들을 어떻게 개선하여 보완해야 하는지에 대하여 시사점을 제공한다. 협력적 계획이론에 대한 탐구를 바탕으로, 협력적 계획의 네 가지 구성요소들인 '제도적 맥락', '상호작용의 장', '사회적 학습', '참여 및 합의형성'을 도출하였고, 그중 제도적 맥락을 중심으로 분석을 진행하였다. 경주지역 고도보존법 개정과정에는 공공부문과 시민부문을 중심으로 하는 다양한 이해관계자들이 네트워크를 형성하고 있으며, 공유된 이해에 따라 네트워크는 변화하는 양상을 나타냈다. 개정과정의 이해관계자들은 공청회와 주민설명회를 중심으로 하는 상호작용의 장에서 유통되는 정보를 바탕으로 사회적 학습을 하고 있었으며, 이를 바탕으로 계획과정에 참여하여 개정안의 도출이라는 합의를 형성하였다. 분석의 결과를 종합하면, 경주의 사례는 협력적 계획의 외형은 갖추어져 있다고 평가할 수 있지만, 실제 과정에 있어서는 공공부문의 제한적인 정보공개 범위와 접근성의 문제, 참여자의 대표성과 권력의 비차별성이 부족, 상호작용의 장에서 공동학습이 이루어지기보다 소통의 방향이 일방적이라는 문제점을 가지고 있었다. 제도적 맥락으로 종합하면, 경주지역에 있어 위 문제들은 이해관계자들 간 신뢰저하의 원인으로 작용하였다. 경주지역의 이해관계자들은 정책의 목표달성을 위해 표면적으로 협력하고 있지만 서로를 신뢰하지 않았다. 지방환경에서 발생하는 공공부문과 시민들 간의 신뢰의 문제는 지속적인 합의형성의 학습에서 그 해답을 구할 수 있기에, 정책적 제언을 통해 제도적 보완과 사유재산권 제한에 대한 해법을 모색하고자 하였다. ; Gyeongju-city's preservation law revision process is evaluated as collaborative planning practices. On this case, first the public sector and citizens recognize social problem and conflicts, then various stakeholders are produced agreement with participation and interaction. Therefore, this analysis of cooperative Gyeongju case through the components of the collaborative planning theory provides implications for suitability of collaborative planning theory. It also provides the application of local environment and how to improve and supplement in real life problems. To precede the analysis, first I studied on collaborative planning theory and then derived four components of the collaborative planning theory that 'institutional context', 'field of interaction', 'social learning', 'participation and consensus-building'. Among these components, analysis was performed mainly on the institutional context. Various stakeholders to form a network and a shared understanding of the network showed a changing pattern in this revision process. Stakeholders are conducting social learning, based on the information that delivered by public-hearings and presentations around field of interaction. Based on this information, they involved in the planning process and derived the agreement. In sum, this case evaluated as collaborative planning case superficially. But there are some problems in process that information, participation and mutual understanding. Problem that listed above acts as the cause of deterioration of trust between stakeholders. On the surface, to achieve the goals of the policy is working, but stakeholders are did not trust each other. Through policy proposal, I tried to seek a solution on deterioration of trust problem. Continuous learning on public consensus is encouraging a social capital, such as trust. Study institutional complements on regional commission and find solution in private property limitation problem, are able to derive consensus making. ; Master