Suchergebnisse

The work is aimed at presenting analysis of social intergation of Lithuanian Poles' Youth and the role of civic activity in this process. In the fisrt, theoretical part, of the work there are discussed conceptions of the ethnic minority, integration and ethnic identity, This part also includes an analysis of the Lithuanian Poles' minority, its civic activity and integration. The structure of ethnic identity is complex: it consists of belonging to nation, ethnic consciousness, the language, culture. In the work all these conponents are discussed in detail. An particular attention is payed to the conception of integration and the role of social activity in this process. Social activity determines the integration of Poles' in Lithuania: such aspects of social acitivity as participation in politics, polish civic organization, issues of education in native language, nationality are discussed in the work. In the work is analysing Poles's social activity by the politics, nationality, education, polish organizations. Discussing these dimensions I refer to such authors as M. Kal'avský, V. Bačová, E. K. Francis, Š. Hernová, J.Mucha as well as works of Lithuanian researchers'. namely N.Kasatkina, T.Leončikas, V.Beresnevičiūtė, M.Taljūnaitė, N.Statkus, R.Motuzas. In the second, empirical part of the work there are presented results of qualitative research on social integration of Lithanian Poles' Youth. In the research there were conducted 18 in-depth semi-structured interviews with two groups of informants – the participants of Polish organizations, and not participating youth. The research allowed to explore what meaning has to be a Pole for polish youth. The reasearch revealed some difficulties of integration into the Lithuanian society: encounters with the Lithuanian people negative attitude toward the Poles' youth, difficulties to join the : Lithuanian organizations, the problems of mixed families, employer negative attitude toward Poles'. The results of the research also show that for Poles' youth it is very important to preserve Polish identity and transfer it to their children. Poles youth actively participates in Polish and Lithuanian organizations, attend in important political decisions of Lithuania.

The work is aimed at presenting analysis of social intergation of Lithuanian Poles' Youth and the role of civic activity in this process. In the fisrt, theoretical part, of the work there are discussed conceptions of the ethnic minority, integration and ethnic identity, This part also includes an analysis of the Lithuanian Poles' minority, its civic activity and integration. The structure of ethnic identity is complex: it consists of belonging to nation, ethnic consciousness, the language, culture. In the work all these conponents are discussed in detail. An particular attention is payed to the conception of integration and the role of social activity in this process. Social activity determines the integration of Poles' in Lithuania: such aspects of social acitivity as participation in politics, polish civic organization, issues of education in native language, nationality are discussed in the work. In the work is analysing Poles's social activity by the politics, nationality, education, polish organizations. Discussing these dimensions I refer to such authors as M. Kal'avský, V. Bačová, E. K. Francis, Š. Hernová, J.Mucha as well as works of Lithuanian researchers'. namely N.Kasatkina, T.Leončikas, V.Beresnevičiūtė, M.Taljūnaitė, N.Statkus, R.Motuzas. In the second, empirical part of the work there are presented results of qualitative research on social integration of Lithanian Poles' Youth. In the research there were conducted 18 in-depth semi-structured interviews with two groups of informants – the participants of Polish organizations, and not participating youth. The research allowed to explore what meaning has to be a Pole for polish youth. The reasearch revealed some difficulties of integration into the Lithuanian society: encounters with the Lithuanian people negative attitude toward the Poles' youth, difficulties to join the : Lithuanian organizations, the problems of mixed families, employer negative attitude toward Poles'. The results of the research also show that for Poles' youth it is very important to preserve Polish identity and transfer it to their children. Poles youth actively participates in Polish and Lithuanian organizations, attend in important political decisions of Lithuania.

The work is aimed at presenting analysis of social intergation of Lithuanian Poles' Youth and the role of civic activity in this process. In the fisrt, theoretical part, of the work there are discussed conceptions of the ethnic minority, integration and ethnic identity, This part also includes an analysis of the Lithuanian Poles' minority, its civic activity and integration. The structure of ethnic identity is complex: it consists of belonging to nation, ethnic consciousness, the language, culture. In the work all these conponents are discussed in detail. An particular attention is payed to the conception of integration and the role of social activity in this process. Social activity determines the integration of Poles' in Lithuania: such aspects of social acitivity as participation in politics, polish civic organization, issues of education in native language, nationality are discussed in the work. In the work is analysing Poles's social activity by the politics, nationality, education, polish organizations. Discussing these dimensions I refer to such authors as M. Kal'avský, V. Bačová, E. K. Francis, Š. Hernová, J.Mucha as well as works of Lithuanian researchers'. namely N.Kasatkina, T.Leončikas, V.Beresnevičiūtė, M.Taljūnaitė, N.Statkus, R.Motuzas. In the second, empirical part of the work there are presented results of qualitative research on social integration of Lithanian Poles' Youth. In the research there were conducted 18 in-depth semi-structured interviews with two groups of informants – the participants of Polish organizations, and not participating youth. The research allowed to explore what meaning has to be a Pole for polish youth. The reasearch revealed some difficulties of integration into the Lithuanian society: encounters with the Lithuanian people negative attitude toward the Poles' youth, difficulties to join the : Lithuanian organizations, the problems of mixed families, employer negative attitude toward Poles'. The results of the research also show that for Poles' youth it is very important to preserve Polish identity and transfer it to their children. Poles youth actively participates in Polish and Lithuanian organizations, attend in important political decisions of Lithuania.

The work is aimed at presenting analysis of social intergation of Lithuanian Poles' Youth and the role of civic activity in this process. In the fisrt, theoretical part, of the work there are discussed conceptions of the ethnic minority, integration and ethnic identity, This part also includes an analysis of the Lithuanian Poles' minority, its civic activity and integration. The structure of ethnic identity is complex: it consists of belonging to nation, ethnic consciousness, the language, culture. In the work all these conponents are discussed in detail. An particular attention is payed to the conception of integration and the role of social activity in this process. Social activity determines the integration of Poles' in Lithuania: such aspects of social acitivity as participation in politics, polish civic organization, issues of education in native language, nationality are discussed in the work. In the work is analysing Poles's social activity by the politics, nationality, education, polish organizations. Discussing these dimensions I refer to such authors as M. Kal'avský, V. Bačová, E. K. Francis, Š. Hernová, J.Mucha as well as works of Lithuanian researchers'. namely N.Kasatkina, T.Leončikas, V.Beresnevičiūtė, M.Taljūnaitė, N.Statkus, R.Motuzas. In the second, empirical part of the work there are presented results of qualitative research on social integration of Lithanian Poles' Youth. In the research there were conducted 18 in-depth semi-structured interviews with two groups of informants – the participants of Polish organizations, and not participating youth. The research allowed to explore what meaning has to be a Pole for polish youth. The reasearch revealed some difficulties of integration into the Lithuanian society: encounters with the Lithuanian people negative attitude toward the Poles' youth, difficulties to join the : Lithuanian organizations, the problems of mixed families, employer negative attitude toward Poles'. The results of the research also show that for Poles' youth it is very important to preserve Polish identity and transfer it to their children. Poles youth actively participates in Polish and Lithuanian organizations, attend in important political decisions of Lithuania.

In this reasearch work the main attention is appointed to judicial activity in social media and its legality. The issue of this subject is focused on judges position in society. They are binding by plenty of professional ethics rules and restrictions on the private life. Social media is tremendous "helper" which allow people to communicate fast, easily and free. But at the same time social network has a lot of threats, especially for judges. For instance cyber security issues, disclosure judges privacy which could necessitate a bring of discredit on judiciary, anonimity on communication between judges and others which could cause a difficulty to reveal corruption , the ability on social media to share information on judge's wall or make comments, the ability to tag judge or set a location where judge is. Also judges must upload their photos and since, the other users can easily download those photos and troll it in case of criticism of judgments. Other people are able to see judge relations by watching his "friend" list. So, such activity on social networking media by judges seems to be forbidden, because in democratic society judges must maintain the public confidence of legal system. Hypothesis of this reasearch is that judicial activity in electronic social media does not violate profesional ethics. Crucial tasks of this reasearch are the following: 1. To find the main threats for judges which are inside social media. 2. To find out, wheather judicial conduct rules allow judges to use social media and ensure safe browsing. Are those rules capable to prevent judges for violation of professional ethics rules in electronic social media. The problem aspects of judicial ethics regulation. 3. To dispute the experience of the United States of America in the field of judges activity in social media and find out the main point of view. Also, according to this experience the task is to establish a framework of judicial ativity in social media. 4. To discuss and find out legal doctrines point of view and insights. 5. In the context of US experience and legal doctrine insights the one of the tasks is to dispute Lithuania case and give some critical thoughts. In the proceeding of this reasearch it emerged that judges are not restricted to participate in social media, therefore the hypothesis proved out. But at the same time some kind of framefork or restrictions of judges activity in social media have been established. It emerged that: 1. Judge's can not communicate in ways that such communications could mean bias or inappropriate, or ex parte communication for judge. 2. Judge's are not allowed to "follow" or "like" pages in social media which maintain inadequate or obscene content or doing political dealings. 3. Judge must be coutious dealing with "friend" list in social media. He can't accept "friend" request from other lawyers which are parties of pending cases. Same thing is with non lawyers. 4. Judge's also are not allowed to make comments on pending cases. As well they are not allowed to make and share embarrassing statements. 5. By uploading photos or images, judge must remain impartial, unbiased and show propriety and neutrality. 6. Judge's also must be cautious then they getting files and other information via social media, because cyber security threats are the biggest trouble. Talking about Lithuania case, in this reasearch has been concluded that this case was not related to internet anyway. The court held that judges are not prohibited for making statements in blogs or in general internet. The court cited ECHR judgments about that judges are allowed to make statements via television or broadcasting media. But the Lithuania court has not talked about threats in social media sites, has not cited legal doctrine insights ant notes about judges ethics in social media. So the court has not created a suitable precedent for similar cases in the future. And finally this reasearch work provides some recommendations regarding modernization of further judicial ethics regulation to legislative branch. And also recommendation for further judgments related to judicial activity in social media to Lithuania courts.

In this reasearch work the main attention is appointed to judicial activity in social media and its legality. The issue of this subject is focused on judges position in society. They are binding by plenty of professional ethics rules and restrictions on the private life. Social media is tremendous "helper" which allow people to communicate fast, easily and free. But at the same time social network has a lot of threats, especially for judges. For instance cyber security issues, disclosure judges privacy which could necessitate a bring of discredit on judiciary, anonimity on communication between judges and others which could cause a difficulty to reveal corruption , the ability on social media to share information on judge's wall or make comments, the ability to tag judge or set a location where judge is. Also judges must upload their photos and since, the other users can easily download those photos and troll it in case of criticism of judgments. Other people are able to see judge relations by watching his "friend" list. So, such activity on social networking media by judges seems to be forbidden, because in democratic society judges must maintain the public confidence of legal system. Hypothesis of this reasearch is that judicial activity in electronic social media does not violate profesional ethics. Crucial tasks of this reasearch are the following: 1. To find the main threats for judges which are inside social media. 2. To find out, wheather judicial conduct rules allow judges to use social media and ensure safe browsing. Are those rules capable to prevent judges for violation of professional ethics rules in electronic social media. The problem aspects of judicial ethics regulation. 3. To dispute the experience of the United States of America in the field of judges activity in social media and find out the main point of view. Also, according to this experience the task is to establish a framework of judicial ativity in social media. 4. To discuss and find out legal doctrines point of view and insights. 5. In the context of US experience and legal doctrine insights the one of the tasks is to dispute Lithuania case and give some critical thoughts. In the proceeding of this reasearch it emerged that judges are not restricted to participate in social media, therefore the hypothesis proved out. But at the same time some kind of framefork or restrictions of judges activity in social media have been established. It emerged that: 1. Judge's can not communicate in ways that such communications could mean bias or inappropriate, or ex parte communication for judge. 2. Judge's are not allowed to "follow" or "like" pages in social media which maintain inadequate or obscene content or doing political dealings. 3. Judge must be coutious dealing with "friend" list in social media. He can't accept "friend" request from other lawyers which are parties of pending cases. Same thing is with non lawyers. 4. Judge's also are not allowed to make comments on pending cases. As well they are not allowed to make and share embarrassing statements. 5. By uploading photos or images, judge must remain impartial, unbiased and show propriety and neutrality. 6. Judge's also must be cautious then they getting files and other information via social media, because cyber security threats are the biggest trouble. Talking about Lithuania case, in this reasearch has been concluded that this case was not related to internet anyway. The court held that judges are not prohibited for making statements in blogs or in general internet. The court cited ECHR judgments about that judges are allowed to make statements via television or broadcasting media. But the Lithuania court has not talked about threats in social media sites, has not cited legal doctrine insights ant notes about judges ethics in social media. So the court has not created a suitable precedent for similar cases in the future. And finally this reasearch work provides some recommendations regarding modernization of further judicial ethics regulation to legislative branch. And also recommendation for further judgments related to judicial activity in social media to Lithuania courts.

In this reasearch work the main attention is appointed to judicial activity in social media and its legality. The issue of this subject is focused on judges position in society. They are binding by plenty of professional ethics rules and restrictions on the private life. Social media is tremendous "helper" which allow people to communicate fast, easily and free. But at the same time social network has a lot of threats, especially for judges. For instance cyber security issues, disclosure judges privacy which could necessitate a bring of discredit on judiciary, anonimity on communication between judges and others which could cause a difficulty to reveal corruption , the ability on social media to share information on judge's wall or make comments, the ability to tag judge or set a location where judge is. Also judges must upload their photos and since, the other users can easily download those photos and troll it in case of criticism of judgments. Other people are able to see judge relations by watching his "friend" list. So, such activity on social networking media by judges seems to be forbidden, because in democratic society judges must maintain the public confidence of legal system. Hypothesis of this reasearch is that judicial activity in electronic social media does not violate profesional ethics. Crucial tasks of this reasearch are the following: 1. To find the main threats for judges which are inside social media. 2. To find out, wheather judicial conduct rules allow judges to use social media and ensure safe browsing. Are those rules capable to prevent judges for violation of professional ethics rules in electronic social media. The problem aspects of judicial ethics regulation. 3. To dispute the experience of the United States of America in the field of judges activity in social media and find out the main point of view. Also, according to this experience the task is to establish a framework of judicial ativity in social media. 4. To discuss and find out legal doctrines point of view and insights. 5. In the context of US experience and legal doctrine insights the one of the tasks is to dispute Lithuania case and give some critical thoughts. In the proceeding of this reasearch it emerged that judges are not restricted to participate in social media, therefore the hypothesis proved out. But at the same time some kind of framefork or restrictions of judges activity in social media have been established. It emerged that: 1. Judge's can not communicate in ways that such communications could mean bias or inappropriate, or ex parte communication for judge. 2. Judge's are not allowed to "follow" or "like" pages in social media which maintain inadequate or obscene content or doing political dealings. 3. Judge must be coutious dealing with "friend" list in social media. He can't accept "friend" request from other lawyers which are parties of pending cases. Same thing is with non lawyers. 4. Judge's also are not allowed to make comments on pending cases. As well they are not allowed to make and share embarrassing statements. 5. By uploading photos or images, judge must remain impartial, unbiased and show propriety and neutrality. 6. Judge's also must be cautious then they getting files and other information via social media, because cyber security threats are the biggest trouble. Talking about Lithuania case, in this reasearch has been concluded that this case was not related to internet anyway. The court held that judges are not prohibited for making statements in blogs or in general internet. The court cited ECHR judgments about that judges are allowed to make statements via television or broadcasting media. But the Lithuania court has not talked about threats in social media sites, has not cited legal doctrine insights ant notes about judges ethics in social media. So the court has not created a suitable precedent for similar cases in the future. And finally this reasearch work provides some recommendations regarding modernization of further judicial ethics regulation to legislative branch. And also recommendation for further judgments related to judicial activity in social media to Lithuania courts.

The aim of this study was to describe the historical development of pharmaceutical organisations, their tasks and ability to fulfill them. In the XIXth century a rapid development of the science of pharmacy influenced a need for scientific collaboration. Thus, in 1819 Department of Pharmacy of Vilnius Medical Society was founded by Vilnius chemists. The main directions of the activity of the members of this department were the following: scientific investigations, solution of practical tasks, spreading of pharmaceutical information, popularization of the knowledge of pharmaceutical science. However, a progressive dynamic development of pharmacy was hindered by unfavorable political and economic factors. In 1917, Lithuanians working in Russia united in a "Society of Lithuanian Pharmacists". The operation of the society was concerned with nationality, which was the main and the only direction of activity. There were four pharmaceutical organizations acting in the Independent Republic of Lithuania (1918- 1940). In 1940, after Lithuania's annexation to the USSR, all pharmaceutical professional associations were eliminated. In 1948, Lithuanian Scientific Society of Pharmacists was founded. Despite its professional tasks it had also to proclaim ideological aims. Conclusion. Professional activity was influenced by unfavorable political conditions in the country. Independence of social professional associations was limited by czarist Russia, as well as by Soviet authorities. Department of Pharmacy of Vilnius Medical Society had a great influence upon the progress of pharmacy of that time. Associations acting in the Independent Republic of Lithuania were able to defend their business interests, participate in international activity, deal with the affairs of science, the heritage of the pharmacy, and representation of their profession.

The aim of this study was to describe the historical development of pharmaceutical organisations, their tasks and ability to fulfill them. In the XIXth century a rapid development of the science of pharmacy influenced a need for scientific collaboration. Thus, in 1819 Department of Pharmacy of Vilnius Medical Society was founded by Vilnius chemists. The main directions of the activity of the members of this department were the following: scientific investigations, solution of practical tasks, spreading of pharmaceutical information, popularization of the knowledge of pharmaceutical science. However, a progressive dynamic development of pharmacy was hindered by unfavorable political and economic factors. In 1917, Lithuanians working in Russia united in a "Society of Lithuanian Pharmacists". The operation of the society was concerned with nationality, which was the main and the only direction of activity. There were four pharmaceutical organizations acting in the Independent Republic of Lithuania (1918- 1940). In 1940, after Lithuania's annexation to the USSR, all pharmaceutical professional associations were eliminated. In 1948, Lithuanian Scientific Society of Pharmacists was founded. Despite its professional tasks it had also to proclaim ideological aims. Conclusion. Professional activity was influenced by unfavorable political conditions in the country. Independence of social professional associations was limited by czarist Russia, as well as by Soviet authorities. Department of Pharmacy of Vilnius Medical Society had a great influence upon the progress of pharmacy of that time. Associations acting in the Independent Republic of Lithuania were able to defend their business interests, participate in international activity, deal with the affairs of science, the heritage of the pharmacy, and representation of their profession.

In 1925-1940, he was docent, later professor in Kaunas University, in 1925, J. Aleksa was the creator of Farmers' party, in 1925-1927 - President of Agriculture Palace, in 1926-1935, he was Minister of Agriculture, in 1928-1936 - the leader of the Fanners Unity organization, doctor of agriculture science (since 1929). In 1925-1927, he was the editor of the journal "Žemės ūkis". 1948-1955, he was deported to Siberia. So J. Aleksa experienced terror and genocide in soviet prisons and places of deportations such as killing, physical and moral torments, personal indignity, worsening or changing of living conditions which caused deaths. J. Aleksa saw many dramatic events among other prisoners and deportees. J. Aleksa was the author of the ideology of fanners' unity in Independent Lithuania. During the first four decades of the 20th century, the ancient village system of country was transformed into separated farm system. Growing individualism of farmers was accompanied by increasing political polarization. At the same time the process of formation of co-cooperative relations among the fanners started and the efforts for fostering their unity increased. He played very important role in the organization of the agricultural system. Agriculturist, sociologist Jonas Aleksa participated in the process of the development of farmers' solidarity. J. Aleksa was the leader in the Lithuanian agricultural community, propagating the significance of farming in society, improving the culture of farming.

In 1925-1940, he was docent, later professor in Kaunas University, in 1925, J. Aleksa was the creator of Farmers' party, in 1925-1927 - President of Agriculture Palace, in 1926-1935, he was Minister of Agriculture, in 1928-1936 - the leader of the Fanners Unity organization, doctor of agriculture science (since 1929). In 1925-1927, he was the editor of the journal "Žemės ūkis". 1948-1955, he was deported to Siberia. So J. Aleksa experienced terror and genocide in soviet prisons and places of deportations such as killing, physical and moral torments, personal indignity, worsening or changing of living conditions which caused deaths. J. Aleksa saw many dramatic events among other prisoners and deportees. J. Aleksa was the author of the ideology of fanners' unity in Independent Lithuania. During the first four decades of the 20th century, the ancient village system of country was transformed into separated farm system. Growing individualism of farmers was accompanied by increasing political polarization. At the same time the process of formation of co-cooperative relations among the fanners started and the efforts for fostering their unity increased. He played very important role in the organization of the agricultural system. Agriculturist, sociologist Jonas Aleksa participated in the process of the development of farmers' solidarity. J. Aleksa was the leader in the Lithuanian agricultural community, propagating the significance of farming in society, improving the culture of farming.

In 1925-1940, he was docent, later professor in Kaunas University, in 1925, J. Aleksa was the creator of Farmers' party, in 1925-1927 - President of Agriculture Palace, in 1926-1935, he was Minister of Agriculture, in 1928-1936 - the leader of the Fanners Unity organization, doctor of agriculture science (since 1929). In 1925-1927, he was the editor of the journal "Žemės ūkis". 1948-1955, he was deported to Siberia. So J. Aleksa experienced terror and genocide in soviet prisons and places of deportations such as killing, physical and moral torments, personal indignity, worsening or changing of living conditions which caused deaths. J. Aleksa saw many dramatic events among other prisoners and deportees. J. Aleksa was the author of the ideology of fanners' unity in Independent Lithuania. During the first four decades of the 20th century, the ancient village system of country was transformed into separated farm system. Growing individualism of farmers was accompanied by increasing political polarization. At the same time the process of formation of co-cooperative relations among the fanners started and the efforts for fostering their unity increased. He played very important role in the organization of the agricultural system. Agriculturist, sociologist Jonas Aleksa participated in the process of the development of farmers' solidarity. J. Aleksa was the leader in the Lithuanian agricultural community, propagating the significance of farming in society, improving the culture of farming.

In 1925-1940, he was docent, later professor in Kaunas University, in 1925, J. Aleksa was the creator of Farmers' party, in 1925-1927 - President of Agriculture Palace, in 1926-1935, he was Minister of Agriculture, in 1928-1936 - the leader of the Fanners Unity organization, doctor of agriculture science (since 1929). In 1925-1927, he was the editor of the journal "Žemės ūkis". 1948-1955, he was deported to Siberia. So J. Aleksa experienced terror and genocide in soviet prisons and places of deportations such as killing, physical and moral torments, personal indignity, worsening or changing of living conditions which caused deaths. J. Aleksa saw many dramatic events among other prisoners and deportees. J. Aleksa was the author of the ideology of fanners' unity in Independent Lithuania. During the first four decades of the 20th century, the ancient village system of country was transformed into separated farm system. Growing individualism of farmers was accompanied by increasing political polarization. At the same time the process of formation of co-cooperative relations among the fanners started and the efforts for fostering their unity increased. He played very important role in the organization of the agricultural system. Agriculturist, sociologist Jonas Aleksa participated in the process of the development of farmers' solidarity. J. Aleksa was the leader in the Lithuanian agricultural community, propagating the significance of farming in society, improving the culture of farming.

In 1925-1940, he was docent, later professor in Kaunas University, in 1925, J. Aleksa was the creator of Farmers' party, in 1925-1927 - President of Agriculture Palace, in 1926-1935, he was Minister of Agriculture, in 1928-1936 - the leader of the Fanners Unity organization, doctor of agriculture science (since 1929). In 1925-1927, he was the editor of the journal "Žemės ūkis". 1948-1955, he was deported to Siberia. So J. Aleksa experienced terror and genocide in soviet prisons and places of deportations such as killing, physical and moral torments, personal indignity, worsening or changing of living conditions which caused deaths. J. Aleksa saw many dramatic events among other prisoners and deportees. J. Aleksa was the author of the ideology of fanners' unity in Independent Lithuania. During the first four decades of the 20th century, the ancient village system of country was transformed into separated farm system. Growing individualism of farmers was accompanied by increasing political polarization. At the same time the process of formation of co-cooperative relations among the fanners started and the efforts for fostering their unity increased. He played very important role in the organization of the agricultural system. Agriculturist, sociologist Jonas Aleksa participated in the process of the development of farmers' solidarity. J. Aleksa was the leader in the Lithuanian agricultural community, propagating the significance of farming in society, improving the culture of farming.

In 1925-1940, he was docent, later professor in Kaunas University, in 1925, J. Aleksa was the creator of Farmers' party, in 1925-1927 - President of Agriculture Palace, in 1926-1935, he was Minister of Agriculture, in 1928-1936 - the leader of the Fanners Unity organization, doctor of agriculture science (since 1929). In 1925-1927, he was the editor of the journal "Žemės ūkis". 1948-1955, he was deported to Siberia. So J. Aleksa experienced terror and genocide in soviet prisons and places of deportations such as killing, physical and moral torments, personal indignity, worsening or changing of living conditions which caused deaths. J. Aleksa saw many dramatic events among other prisoners and deportees. J. Aleksa was the author of the ideology of fanners' unity in Independent Lithuania. During the first four decades of the 20th century, the ancient village system of country was transformed into separated farm system. Growing individualism of farmers was accompanied by increasing political polarization. At the same time the process of formation of co-cooperative relations among the fanners started and the efforts for fostering their unity increased. He played very important role in the organization of the agricultural system. Agriculturist, sociologist Jonas Aleksa participated in the process of the development of farmers' solidarity. J. Aleksa was the leader in the Lithuanian agricultural community, propagating the significance of farming in society, improving the culture of farming.