Suchergebnisse

Based on two studies with Bosniak and Croatian students in Bosnia and Herzegovina, this paper analyzes the effects of religiosity on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation. Both Christianity and Islam advance forgiveness and reconciliation as one of the major moral imperatives. Previous studies also indicate that religiosity can increase readiness to grant forgiveness on the inter-personal level and facilitate rapprochement. When it comes to inter-group level, prescripts of religious piety often conflict with norms of group solidarity and care. Another set of research suggests that religion obstructs conflict transformation due to the dogmatic reasoning it promotes, including reframing of immanent disputes in transcendental (and thus non-negotiable) terms. This study initially tested whether adding religious symbols to conflict narratives impacts prosocial attitudes of respondents and came with negative results. In other words, adding religious codes to already known narratives about conflicts did not have a significant impact on participants' attitudes. In a subsequent SEM analysis, it was found that religiosity in both groups is strongly correlated with group-centricity, which negatively mediates its relationship with both forgiveness and reconciliation. We conclude that collectivistic forms of religiosity that privilege ingroup solidarity might have negative effects on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation in post-conflict settings.

Based on two studies with Bosniak and Croatian students in Bosnia and Herzegovina, this paper analyzes the effects of religiosity on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation. Both Christianity and Islam advance forgiveness and reconciliation as one of the major moral imperatives. Previous studies also indicate that religiosity can increase readiness to grant forgiveness on the inter-personal level and facilitate rapprochement. When it comes to inter-group level, prescripts of religious piety often conflict with norms of group solidarity and care. Another set of research suggests that religion obstructs conflict transformation due to the dogmatic reasoning it promotes, including reframing of immanent disputes in transcendental (and thus non-negotiable) terms. This study initially tested whether adding religious symbols to conflict narratives impacts prosocial attitudes of respondents and came with negative results. In other words, adding religious codes to already known narratives about conflicts did not have a significant impact on participants' attitudes. In a subsequent SEM analysis, it was found that religiosity in both groups is strongly correlated with group-centricity, which negatively mediates its relationship with both forgiveness and reconciliation. We conclude that collectivistic forms of religiosity that privilege ingroup solidarity might have negative effects on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation in post-conflict settings.

ABSTRACT Objective: to discuss the role of Brazilian nursing to face political, economic and sanitary challenges that compose the crisis situation related to Covid-19 pandemics. Methods: Critical-thinking study with analytics characteristics, based on latin-american critical epidemiology and on the concept of social determination of health. Results: the central issues related to the Brazilian political-economic and health scenario are problematized, with emphasis on the impacts in terms of social inequality deepening. Nursing role is discussed considering the impacts in these worker's health, and the relevance of nurses' actions in the several professional practice scenarios to defend social protection. Conclusions: the role of Brazilian nursing as a social practice for the defense of life and universal access to health is reaffirmed as a way of achieving social justice.

[12], 114, [2] p. ; The first leaf is blank except for a signature-mark and two headpieces. ; The last leaf is blank. ; Leaf [par. par.]2 is a cancel bearing verses by Robert Wright and John Budden. Variant (described by Madan): leaf [par. par.]2 is a conjugate blank. ; Reproduction of the original in the Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery.

Social inequalities fuel a debate about the meaning of political equality. Formal procedural equality is criticised for reproducing discriminatory outcomes against disadvantaged groups but affirmative action, particularly in the form of group quotas, is also contested. When opposing conceptions of substantive equality support divergent views about which procedural rule genuinely respects political equality, democracies cannot identify a standard or rule of procedural fairness to be widely accepted as fair. This dispute over procedural fairness can carry on indefinitely and could challenge democracy's legitimacy claim. I argue that democracies can renew their legitimacy claim by embracing this debate and by accommodating it through constitutional deliberation that must be as impartial and meaningful as possible. Impartiality ideally requires the presence of every citizen in this process because each of them has a unique and evolving experience of inequality. Meaningful deliberation is about offering periodic opportunities for constitutional reform, allowing for continuous feedback, reflection, and learning.

1 broadside. ; At head of title: Apud Falkland vltimo die men[?]s Iulij, anno. Dom. 1599. ; Formerly STC 21956.--Cf. STC (2nd ed.). ; Imperfect: creased and torn with loss of print. ; Reproduction of original in the Bodleian Library.

Abstract How do individuals react to statements that condone acts of corruption and violence? This article contributes to the understanding of how people respond to discourses related to antisocial practices by examining how (1) information about the person who made the statement, and (2) the use of additional information as justification for the antisocial statement affect individuals' agreement with this type of discourse. Relying on moral disengagement theory, we present an experimental study conducted with 487 high school students that assesses the level of agreement with statements made by Brazilian politicians that illustrate different mechanisms of moral disengagement. While overall results indicate low levels of agreement with these statements, comparisons across experimental groups suggest that providing case-based arguments as justification increases agreement with statements in favor of violence but reduces agreement with statements that condone acts of corruption.

[14], Clxiij leaves ; Imprint from colophon. ; Woodcut illustration on title page. ; Title page line 3 ends: "the". ; Folio xvi misnumbered xiiii. ; Some print faded and some pages stained. ; Reproduction of original in the National Library of Scotland.

Indenture granting land from John Boxwood to his daughter Joan Cetterik. Written in a clerical hand in light brown ink & opening with a calligraphic initial "O". Text indicates that Joan Cetterik of Cobham, Kent (widow), daughter of John Boxwood and his wife, Rosa, is to receive certain lands after his death. Complete with red wax seal reinforced by a braided band of straw. Written during the reign of Henry VIII.

[32] p. ; Dedication signed: Tho: Powell. ; Signatures: [A]² B-D⁴ E² . ; Reproduction of the original in the British Library.

[8], cc.lxiiii leaves ; Caption title. ; An enlarged edition of STC 9515.5; translated by John Rastell. ; Imprint from colophon. ; Reproduction of the original in the British Library.

[4], 23, 23-54, [1] p. ; A translation by Claudis Hollyband of the French version of: Explanatio veri ac legitimi juris, quo serenissimus Lusitaniae Rex Antonius eius nominis primis nititur. ; The imprint is false; probably printed in London by Thomas Purfoot (STC), who appropriated the imprint of the edition in French. ; The second leaf is a folded genealogical chart. ; Text continuous despite pagination. ; Reproduction of the original in the Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery.

ca. 298 p. ; Running title: The complaynt of Scotland. ; Variously attributed to Wedderburn and Sir David Lindsay--British Museum Catalog. ; Place and date of imprint suggested by STC (2nd ed.). ; Marginal notes. ; Pages numbered on recto only. ; Signatures: A⁸(-A1) B-C⁸ D⁸(D4 + X22) E⁸(-E5-7) F⁸(-F8) G⁸(-G1-4) H⁸ I⁸(-I8) K⁸(-K1-2) L-O⁸ P⁸(-P7-8) Q⁸(-Q1-5) R⁸ S⁸(-S1). ; Numerous errors in paging. ; Imperfect: lacking t.p.; numerous signatures either lacking or cancelled; cropped and torn, with loss of print. ; Reproduction of original in the British Library.

[52] p. ; Attributed to Morison by STC (2nd ed.) and NUC pre-1956 imprints; wrongly attributed to Sir John Cheke--NUC pre-1956 imprints. ; Place of publication and publisher from colophon. ; Signatures: A-E⁴ F⁶. ; Title within ornamental border. ; Identified as STC 20877 on reel 142. ; Reproduction of originals in the Cambridge University Library and the Huntington Library.

[8], 116, [2] p. ; Dedication signed: Christopher Leuer. ; The first leaf is blank except for signature-mark "A". ; With a final errata leaf. ; Heading to dedication in seven lines. Variant: heading in eight lines. ; Reproduction of the original the Union Theological Seminary (New York, N.Y.). Library.