Este estudio contribuye a la investigación en procesos de comunicación y dilemas concernientes a la privacidad en las Redes Sociales, así como las posibles implicaciones específicas que condicionan la autodeterminación informativa del usuario en el ecosistema digital. El propósito específico es investigar cuándo los usuarios están en posición de obtener un nivel de privacidad deseado haciendo uso de las herramientas técnicas proporcionadas por dichos espacios sociales en la Red, delinear los contextos portencialmente peligrosos para su privacidad y deseñar una manera eficaz de introducir, en dichos escenarios, el xonsentimiento informado propuesto por la Comisión Europea. Para ello, utilizaremos una aproximación etnográfica junto con herramientas tecnológicas.
The legal and constitutional systems should move forward in guaranteeing the right to free development of affectivity and sexuality, beyond its strict protection through the prohibition of discrimination. This involves recognizing a generic "right to identity", closely connected with the dignity and the free development of personality. Both dimensions of the individual, emotions and sexuality, have obvious public projections that demand protection beyond the privacy. This affects the depth on the principle of equality and the review of a symbolic order that for centuries has refused diversity. Adapted from the source document.
La protección del derecho fundamental a la intimidad en el ámbito de las
relaciones laborales ha dado lugar a una amplia y rica jurisprudencia constitucional. Dentro
del ámbito protegido por el derecho a la intimidad cabe distinguir entre intimidad en sentido
fuerte (o intimidad socialmente reconocida) y en sentido débil (intimidad subjetivamente
reservada). Ambas manifestaciones del derecho se proyectan sobre el desarrollo de
la prestación laboral imponiendo límites a los poderes empresariales de vigilancia y control,
cuyo ejercicio debe ajustarse al principio de proporcional. Aunque el artículo 18.1 CE no
protege lo que puede denominarse la libertad de la vida privada, la jurisprudencia constitucional
ha articulado distintas técnicas a fin de amparar ciertas manifestaciones del libre desarrollo
de la personalidad de los trabajadores directamente vinculadas con la vida privada. Lan-harremanen arloan funtsezkoa den intimitatearen eskubidea babesteak
jurisprudentzia konstituzional zabala eta aberatsa eragin du. Intimitate-eskubideak babesten
duen eremuaren baitan, intimitatearen zentzu sendoa (edo gizarteak onartzen duena)
eta zentzu ahula dago (intimitate subjektiboa). Biak ala biak proiektatzen dira lan-prestazioan,
enpresen zaintza-eta kontrol-ahalmenak mugatuz, eta proportzionaltasunaren printzipioa
betearaziz. EKaren 18.1 artikuluak ez du babesten bizitza pribatuaren askatasuna esan ahal
zaiona, baina jurisprudentzia konstituzionalak hainbat teknikaren bidez babesten ditu langileen
nortasunaren garapen librearen zenbait alderdi, zuzenean bizitza pribatuarekin lotuak. The protection of the fundamental right to privacy in the area of the work
relations has caused a rich and wide-ranging constitutional jurisprudence. In the protected
area for the right to privacy, it can be distinguished among a hard privacy (or socially recognized
privacy) and a weak privacy (privacy subjectively reserved). Both manifestations
of the right to privacy are projected on the workplace and they limit the entrepreneurial
powers of surveillance and control, the exercise of which it has to fit the principle of proportionality.
Although article 18.1 CE does not protect what can be denominated the freedom
of the private life, the constitutional jurisprudence has articulated different techniques
in order to protect certain manifestations of the free development of the personality of the
workers directly linked to the private life.
El sector de las telecomunicaciones o comunicaciones electrónicas pone constantemente a prueba la protección de datos y, es posible, que podamos ver cómo este sector vacía de contenido este derecho fundamental. Ello serán casos como los de las interconexiones de redes, operadores de red o sistemas de mensajería instantánea que pueden entrar en conflicto con datos personales, como los datos de tráfico, pudiendo llegar a vulnerar, incluso, el secreto de las comunicaciones o la intimidad. Así, la Ley General de Telecomunicaciones, la Ley de Conservación de Datos o regulación comunitaria como la Directiva sobre Conservación de Datos, la Directiva e-Privacy, la propuesta de un nuevo Reglamento e-Privacy y demás normativa nacional y europea han intentado construir un régimen que proteja la protección de datos en este sector, pero puede que no se haya conseguido del todo. Por ello, es preciso analizar si el régimen jurídico construido es suficiente y si, además, este es compatible con el Reglamento General de Protección de Datos (RGDP) y la Ley Orgánica 3/2018, de 5 de diciembre, de Protección de Datos Personales y Garantía de los Derechos Digitales (LOPDGDD).Telekomunikazioen edo komunikazio elektronikoen sektorea etengabe dabil datuen babesa probatzen; are gehiago, sektoreak oinarrizko eskubide hori edukirik gabe uzten duela ikusiko dugu agian. Sareen interkonexioak, sare-operadoreak edo berehalako mezularitza-sistemak datu pertsonalekin gatazkan sar daitezke, trafikoari buruzko datuekin adibidez. Komunikazioen sekretua edo intimitatea urratzera irits daitezke. Izan ere, Telekomunikazioei buruzko Lege Orokorra, Datuak babesteko Legea, Erkidegoko araudia (datuak babesteari buruzko zuzentaraua, e-Privacy zuzentaraua, e-Privacy erregelamendu berri baten proposamena) eta Estatuko nahiz Europako gainerako araudiak saiatu dira sektore horretako datuak babesteko erregimena ezartzen, baina agian ez da erabat lortu. Horregatik aztertu behar da eratu den erregimen juridikoa nahikoa den eta, horrez gain, bateragarria den Datuak Babesteko Erregelamendu Orokorrarekin (DBEO) eta datu pertsonalak babesteari eta eskubide digitalak bermatzeari buruzko abenduaren 5eko 3/2018 Lege Organikoarekin (DPBEDBLO).The telecommunications sector (or electronic communications sector) is constantly putting data protection to the test and, it is possible, that we see how this sector empties this fundamental right out. This will be cases such as those of network interconnections, network operators or instant messaging services that may conflict with personal data, such as traffic data, and may even violate the right to respect for communications or for private and family life. Thus, the Spanish General Telecommunications Law, the Data Retention Law or European regulation such as the Data Retention Directive, the e-Privacy Directive, the proposal for a new e-Privacy Regulation (ePR) and other national and European regulations have attempted to build a regime that protects data protection in this sector, but it may not have been achieved at all. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze whether the legal regime built is sufficient and, in addition, if it is compatible with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and with the Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December, on the Protection of Personal Data and Guarantee of Digital Rights.
This work explores the motives for online daters to disconnect from dating apps. It draws on two studies: Study 1, an online survey (n = 349) aimed at (past) online dating users (44.7 % female, 91 % heterosexuals), and Study 2, a qualitative one based on semi-structured interviews (n = 20) with (past) online dating users aged 21–45. Quantitative analysis was carried out on survey results to obtain frequencies, and a thematic analysis was applied to explore the survey's open-ended questions and interviews. As both our quantitative and qualitative analyses reveal, individuals disconnect from dating apps due to five main reasons: users' experiences, app features, users' well-being, privacy concerns, and life transitions. Motives for disconnection can be cumulative and can change over time. The motives also reflect the meaning of dating apps through how they are appropriated and incorporated into everyday activities. Although disconnection reflects the ambivalent relationship of users with dating apps, they are aware of the possibility of reconnecting whenever they want or need to.
The purpose of this essay is to analyze the role of educational policies regarding artificial intelligence and the ethical implications of this discussion. The theoretical conceptualization of artificial intelligence, which emphasizes the ability of machines to perform tasks that, through algorithms, can simulate human activity. Educational policies regarding the use of artificial intelligence, which, although they do not have an international framework for action, the guidelines issued by international organizations point to the inclusive and equitable use of these technologies, with a view to consolidating education, minimizing social inequalities and achieving the best possible performance. The ethical dilemmas raised by AI, including loss of privacy, underlying commercial and political interests, widening social gaps, exclusion and the continuing fear of the emergence of digital surveillance. The method used for the elaboration of the research was documentary exploration. It is concluded that it is urgent to implement educational policies in accordance with the demands of the digital society, aiming at strengthening education.
The article analyzes the peculiarities of the development of legal regulation of personal data protection in the EU countries and Ukraine. It analyzes how the European legislator's approach to personal data protection has changed. The need for changes was due to the development of information technologies and, as a result, increased risk of their use to interfere in private life. As a result, European legislation on personal data protection has been strengthened, which has become particularly noticeable after the adoption of the General Data Protection Regulation (hereinafter - GDPR). Special attention is paid to the principles of lawful, fair and transparent processing of personal data concerning: limiting the target; data minimization; accurate and up-to-date processing; limiting the storage of personal data in a form that allows identification; confidentiality and security of data storage; accountability and responsibility. The current Ukrainian legislation on personal data protection is analyzed. Finally, the correlation between the categories "right to privacy" and "personal data protection" was studied.
In legal literature, the dissemination of false information on the Internet is referred to as online defamation. However, Ukrainian legislation does not enshrine this term, which creates difficulties with respect to legal protection against online defamation. So, the aim of the article is to determine the legal remedies for countering defamation of public figures on the Internet. The research involved the following methods: analysis, case study, graphic methods. The study revealed the main contradictions in defamation research and identified unexplored aspects of the issue. The legislation of Ukraine and other countries of the world with regard to defamation and protection against libel is examined. International aspects of providing protection against defamation and the researchers' recommendations on how to balance the right to freedom of expression and the right to privacy are studied. Highlighted in the conclusions are that the study established the need to improve Ukraine's legislative framework on defamation issues, make changes in educational programs and improve the media literacy of the population. Prospects for future research include the study of the means of settlement of defamation cases at the international level.
