Suchergebnisse

The objectives of government are pivotal to understanding the diverse negative effects of corruption on public welfare. Corruption renders governments unable or unwilling to maximize welfare. In the first case, it distorts agents' decisions and limits the contractual space available to agents and the government, acting as a benevolent principal. In the second case, a corrupt principal creates allocative inefficiencies, cripples its credible commitment to effective policies, and opens the door to opportunism.

""Contents""; ""Acknowledgments""; ""1 Desperately Seeking a Successor to the Welfare State""; ""Progressive Theories of Social Welfare""; ""1. Social�Democratic Perspectives""; ""2. Marxian and Neo�Marxian Approaches""; ""3. Feminist Perspectives""; ""4. The Anti-Racist Critique of the Welfare State""; ""5. The Green Critique of the Welfare State""; ""6. The Emancipatory Needs�Articulation Approach to Social Welfare""; ""Towards a Theoretical Synthesis""; ""From Theory to Issues""; ""The Social Movements and Organizations""; ""Dealing with Issues in the ""Real World""""

Evaluating WELFARE REFORM in an Era of Transition -- Copyright -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- Executive Summary -- THE PANEL -- FINDINGS -- KEY QUESTIONS OF INTEREST -- Populations of Interest -- Outcomes of Interest -- Research Questions of Interest -- EVALUATION METHODS FOR THE QUESTIONS OF INTEREST -- DATA FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATING SOCIAL WELFARE PROGRAMS -- 1 Introduction -- THE PANEL -- POLICY BACKGROUND -- STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT -- 2 Welfare Reform Monitoring and Evaluation: The Current Landscape -- Major Supporting Funders -- DESCRIPTIVE AND MONITORING STUDIES -- STUDIES OF WELFARE LEAVERS AND RELATED GROUPS -- RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS -- CASELOAD AND OTHER ECONOMETRIC MODELS -- PROCESS, IMPLEMENTATION, AND QUALITATIVE STUDIES -- OTHER WELFARE REFORM STUDIES -- STUDIES ON TOPICS RELATED TO WELFARE REFORM -- 3 Research Questions and Populations of Interest -- POPULATIONS OF INTEREST -- OUTCOMES OF INTEREST -- QUESTIONS OF INTEREST -- Monitoring the Well-Being of the Low-Income Population -- Characterizing and Tracking Policies, Programs, and Administrative Practices -- Formally Evaluating the Impact of Welfare Reform -- NATIONWIDE VERSUS INDIVIDUAL STATE ASSESSMENTS -- ASSESSMENT -- 4 Evaluation Methods and Issues -- OVERVIEW OF EVALUATION METHODS -- Experimental Methods -- Nonexperimental Methods -- Process Analysis and Qualitative Methods -- EVALUATION METHODS FOR THE QUESTIONS OF INTEREST -- Estimating the Overall Effects of Structural Welfare Reform -- Estimating the Effects of Individual Broad Reform Components -- Estimating the Effects of Detailed Reform Strategies -- Conclusions -- ISSUES IN EVALUATION METHODOLOGY -- Assessing the Reliability of Nonexperimental Evaluation Methods -- Specification Tests -- Sensitivity Testing -- Applying Nonexperimental Methods to Experimental Data.

Cover -- Half Title -- Title -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- List of Figures and Tables -- Foreword -- Acknowledgements -- Notes on the Contributors -- List of Abbreviations -- 1. Challenges and Change: Issues and Perspectives in the Analysis of Globalization and the European Welfare States -- PART I GLOBALIZATION CHALLENGES -- 2. Globalization and Welfare States: Some Unsettling Thoughts -- 3. Globalization, Economic Change and the Welfare State: 'Vexatious Inquisition of Taxation'? -- 4. International Organizations, the EU and Global Social Policy -- PART II EUROPEAN WELFARE STATE CHANGES -- 5. Globalization and the Bismarckian Welfare States -- 6. Globalization and the Southern Welfare States -- 7. Welfare and 'Ill-Fare' Systems in Central-Eastern Europe -- 8. Globalization and the Nordic Welfare States -- 9. Globalization and the Liberal Welfare States -- PART III CONCLUSION -- 10. Globalization and the European Welfare States: Evaluating the Theories and Evidence -- Bibliography -- Index.

ABSTRACT ln this note the growth and welfare effects of fiscal and monetary policies are investigated in four economies where public investment is part of the productive process. It is shown that growth is maximized at positive levels of income tax and inflation but that there is no direct relationship between government size, productivity and growth or between inflation and growth. However, unless there are no transfers, no political conflict or public goods in the economy, maximization of growth does not imply welfare maximization and the optimal tax rate and government size are greater than those that maximize growth. Money is not superneutral and the optimal rate of money creation is below the maximizing rate of growth.

Intro -- CONTENTS -- TABLES -- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION -- CHAPTER 2 JAPAN -- CHAPTER 3 SOUTH KOREA -- CHAPTER 4 TAIWAN -- CHAPTER 5 SINGAPORE -- CHAPTER 6 HONG KONG -- CHAPTER 7 MAINLAND CHINA -- CHAPTER 8 THE FUTURE OF THE WELFARE STATE IN EAST ASIA -- NOTES -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- INDEX -- About the Author.

Richard Titmuss was Professor of Social Administration at the London School of Economics from 1950 until his death in 1973. His publications on welfare and social policy were radical and wide-ranging, spanning fields such as demography, class inequalities in health, social work, and altruism. Titmuss's work played a critical role in establishing the study of social policy as a scientific discipline; it helped to shape the development of the British Welfare State and influenced thinking about social policy worldwide. Despite its continuing relevance to current social policy issues both in the UK and internationally, much of Titmuss's work is now out of print. This book brings together a selection of his most important writings on a range of key social policy issues, together with commentary on these from contemporary experts in the field. The book should be read by undergraduate and postgraduate students in social policy and sociology, for many of whom Titmuss remains compulsory reading. It will be of interest to academics and other policy analysts as well as students and academics in political science and social work

According to the most influential metanarratives in American social-policy history, religion has been virtually irrelevant to the development of American welfare in the twentieth century. In crude terms, the main story line is that public welfare replaced religion—for good. The chief alternative story agrees that religion was replaced—but for bad. More carefully, the mainstream story portrays a "quasi-welfare state" supplanting the fragmentary assistance offered by local sectarian, voluntary, and municipal programs, and measures welfare progress by the growth of government provision at the expense of private and religious action. The competing interpretation regards the creation of the government welfare system to constitute, in Marvin Olasky's terms, "the tragedy of American compassion," because effective, personal, and spiritual assistance was replaced by bureaucratic programs unable to address the deepest needs of the poor. Although the two stories evaluate the outcome differently, they agree about the disappearance or irrelevance of religion to American public welfare.