"This paper is a summary of a discussion at the Third annual round table conference of the American public welfare association, held in Washington, D.C., in December, 1938." ; Cover-title. ; Mode of access: Internet.
I. Social efficiency in business: Industrial hygiene as a factor in human conservation, by I. Fisher; Provision for the safety of employees, by R.C. Bolling; Protection against occupational diseases, by J.B. Andrews; Reporting of occupation diseases by phsyicians, by W.G. Thompson; Sanitation and ventilation of factories, by G.M. Price; The health of women workers, by Jane S. Klink; The doctor and the nurse in industrial establishments, by Lillian D. Wald; The woman's welfare department of the National civic federation, by Mrs. J.H. Hammond.--II. The improvement of labor legislation: The efficient enforcement of labor legislation, by P.T. Sherman; Provision against the consequences of industrial accidents, by M.M. Dawson; The compensation amendment to the New York constitution, by H.R. Seager; Discussion of workmen's compensation legislation, by D.W. Morrow and E.T. Devine; Labor law improvement and enforcement: The manufacturer's attitude, by J. Calder.--III. Financial facilities for wage-earners: Investments on the instalment plan, by W.E. Harmon; Discussion of investments on the instalment system, by I.N. Seligman and H.R. Mussey; Remedial loans--a constructive program, by A.H. Ham; Discussion of remedial loans, by R.B. Fosdick; Discussion of remedial legislation, by A. Wilcox; The mutual investment association of the Postal telegraph company, by E. Reynolds; Coöperative loan societies, by P. Jay; The celluloid club saving and loan department, by S.T. Simmonds; Coöperative saving and loan associations, by E.E. Pratt.--IV. Government and business: The basis of government regulation, by S.M. Lindsay; Government regulation--the railroad view, by R. Walker; Government regulation--New York's responsibility, by G.W. Perkins; The objections to government regulation, by F.W. Whitridge; The relation of government to business, by H.R. Seager; Social relations of big business, by J.H. Hammond; Report of the autumn meeting of the Academy of ; Mode of access: Internet.
At head of title: The Government of the Philippine islands, Department of the interior, Office of the public welfare commissioner ; Mode of access: Internet.
At head of title: The Government of the Philippine Islands, Department of the Interior, Office of the Public Welfare Commissioner, Manila. ; Mode of access: Internet.
At head of title: The government of the Philippine islands. Department of the interior. Office of the public welfare commissioner, Manila ; Mode of access: Internet.
No other volunmes published in this series. ; At head of title: The government of the Philippine Islands. Department of the Interior. Office of the Public Welfare Commissioner. Manila. ; Mode of access: Internet.
Economic growth is an eff ort to accelerate the pace of development due to the acceleration of economic growth will be able to push the performance of the sectors there are other more effi cient and productive. High economic growth would create a larger distribution of income and improve public welfare. Investment growth plays an important role in economic growth, because investment is a signifi cant component of expenditure that will aff ect demand and also aff ect employment opportunities. This study aims to determine the eff ect of private investment, public investment on economic growth and employment as well as the livelihoods of the urban districts in East Java province. Variables used in this study is composed of exogenous variables private investment and government investment; endogenous variables, namely the welfare of society; intervening variable of economic growth and man power absorption. The data used are time coherent data covering the period 2003-2008 in 38 districts / municipalities in East Java province.
Faced with social and health system capacity constraints and rising and changing demand for welfare services, governments and welfare providers are increasingly relying on innovation to help support and enhance services. However, the evidence reported by several studies indicates that the realization of that potential is not an easy task. Innovations can be deemed inherently complex to implement and operate, because many of them involve a combination of technological and organizational renewal within an environment featuring a diversity of stakeholders. Many public welfare service innovations are markedly systemic in their nature, which means that they emerge from, and must address, the complex interplay between political, administrative, technological, institutional and legal issues. This paper suggests that stakeholders dealing with systemic innovation in welfare services must deal with ambiguous and incomplete information in circumstances of uncertainty. Employing a literature review methodology and case study, this paper identifies, categorizes and discusses different aspects of the uncertainty of systemic innovation in public welfare services, and argues that uncertainty can be classified into eight categories: technological uncertainty, market uncertainty, regulatory/institutional uncertainty, social/political uncertainty, acceptance/legitimacy uncertainty, managerial uncertainty, timing uncertainty and consequence uncertainty.
Reuse of record except for individual research requires license from Congressional Information Service, Inc. ; At head of title: 93d Congress, 2d session. Committee print. ; CIS Microfiche Accession Numbers: CIS 74 S542-9 ; Microfiche. ; Mode of access: Internet.
The collection of taxes, in any economic system, clearly requires the use of resources. In modern democratic states tax legislation is almost always controversial, and subject to extensive lobbying. In developing counties the wealthy often successfully avoid payment of taxes and the burden has to be borne by relatively impoverished rural classes, who are themselves not easy to tax directly because of poor record -keeping and difficulty of communications. In earlier times kings and princes often lacked the necessary means of direct taxation and were forced to rely on decentralized institutions such as feudalism. To convince the skeptical reader that the issue of tax-collection costs is neither trivial nor obvious, we pose the following question. What is the effect of greater efficiency in tax collection on the welfare of the tax-paying public? If the government is benign, taxing only to defray socially necessary public expenditure, a reduction in the costs of collecting these minimal taxes would clearly be a 'good thing'. What, however, if the state is inherently "predatory" in nature, as argued by Brennan and Buchanan (1980) and a number of others? In this case the state taxes not only to pay for public services but also to raise revenue for its own, possibly nefarious, purposes. Would an increase in the efficiency if tax-collection be undesirable under this alternative scenario?