Regulatory costs in profile
In: Policy sciences: integrating knowledge and practice to advance human dignity ; the journal of the Society of Policy Scientists, Band 31, Heft 4, S. 301-320
ISSN: 0032-2687
6045 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Policy sciences: integrating knowledge and practice to advance human dignity ; the journal of the Society of Policy Scientists, Band 31, Heft 4, S. 301-320
ISSN: 0032-2687
SSRN
In: American political, economic, and security issues
In: Economic issues, problems and perspectives series
SSRN
In: Journal of benefit-cost analysis: JBCA, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 35-43
ISSN: 2152-2812
AbstractThe Biden administration has made equity a priority when issuing regulations, encouraging agencies to ensure that their regulations appropriately benefit and do not inappropriately burden disadvantaged groups. But scholarly examinations of agencies' practices to date on understanding the distributional consequences of their regulations and on promoting equity have revealed significant gaps. In particular, agencies pay very little attention to the incidence of the costs of their regulations. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, for example, rarely considers the incidence of regulatory costs among disadvantaged groups, despite being an agency that conducts relatively complete benefit–cost analyses and explicitly analyzes environmental justice implications of its regulations. But this cost-blindness is a mistake; it presents a missed opportunity to use the current equity-focused momentum to make real improvements for disadvantaged groups that could have long-lasting effects. This essay calls for agencies to give more attention to the incidence of regulatory costs in order to identify needs and opportunities for grants and investments to disadvantaged groups. This approach could provide much-needed direction for a program like the Biden administration's Justice40 initiative.
In: Context and the Evolution of Mechanisms for Solving Collective Action Problems Paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: Social science quarterly, Band 72, Heft 4, S. 751
ISSN: 0038-4941
In: Journal of policy analysis and management: the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 297-322
ISSN: 0276-8739
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
In: The Images of the Consumer in EU Law: Legislation, Free Movement and Competition Law, edited by Dorota Leczykiewicz and Stephen Weatherill (Hart Publishing Oxford 2016)
SSRN
In: Social science quarterly, Band 72, Heft Dec 91
ISSN: 0038-4941
While committee jurisdiction appears to be important at the aggregate level in determining political action committee (PAC) contributions, the study finds other attributes such as legislator's vote history, seniority and electoral marginality dominate PAC strategies at member-level analyses. This reflects microeconomic theories of utility--maximizing behaviour on the part of private sector actors, and politicians. (Abstract amended)
In: Regulation: the Cato review of business and government, Band 4, S. 13-26
ISSN: 0147-0590
In: CEPS Research Report, 2017
SSRN