Suchergebnisse

Trascendencia constitucional de la exigencia de mayoría de edad para el reconocimiento del derecho a la identidad sexual y al cambio en la mención registral del sexo en el Registro Civil en el caso de las personas transexuales y su incardinación en las limitaciones a la capacidad de obrar de las menores de edad. Diversidad de tratamiento jurídico de la edad y su tratamiento legislativo y jurisprudencial en atención a la progresiva adquisición de discernimiento y capacidad de entender y emitir su voluntad de las personas en su minoría de edad legal. El principio de interés superior de la persona menor de edad como marco referencial para analizar cada caso concreto en defensa de los derechos fundamentales en general y su concreción en la niñez y adolescencia. La dificultad de la valoración de este concepto jurídico indeterminado. ; Constitutional transcendence of the requirement of majority for the recognition of the right to sexual identity and the change in the registration of sex in the Civil Registry in the case of transsexual people and their incardination in the limitations to the capacity to act Minors. Diversity of legal treatment of the age and its legislative and jurisprudential treatment in attention to the progressive acquisition of discernment and ability to understand and to issue its will in the best interest of the minor. The principle of the best interest of the child as a frame of reference to analyze each specific case in defense of fundamental rights in general and its concretion in the case of minors. The difficulty of assessing this indeterminate legal concept.

[EN] Constitutional transcendence of the requirement of majority for the recognition of the right to sexual identity and the change in the registration of sex in the Civil Registry in the case of transsexual people and their incardination in the limitations to the capacity to act Minors. Diversity of legal treatment of the age and its legislative and jurisprudential treatment in attention to the progressive acquisition of discernment and ability to understand and to issue its will in the best interest of the minor. The principle of the best interest of the child as a frame of reference to analyze each specific case in defense of fundamental rights in general and its concretion in the case of minors. The difficulty of assessing this indeterminate legal concept. ; [ES] Trascendencia constitucional de la exigencia de mayoría de edad para el reconocimiento del derecho a la identidad sexual y al cambio en la mención registral del sexo en el Registro Civil en el caso de las personas transexuales y su incardinación en las limitaciones a la capacidad de obrar de las menores de edad. Diversidad de tratamiento jurídico de la edad y su tratamiento legislativo y jurisprudencial en atención a la progresiva adquisición de discernimiento y capacidad de entender y emitir su voluntad de las personas en su minoría de edad legal. El principio de interés superior de la persona menor de edad como marco referencial para analizar cada caso concreto en defensa de los derechos fundamentales en general y su concreción en la niñez y adolescencia. La dificultad de la valoración de este concepto jurídico indeterminado. ; Sánchez Freyre, JM. (2018). La mayoría de edad como requisito para la rectificación registral del sexo y el nombre: una cuestión de derechos fundamentales. Revista sobre la infancia y la adolescencia. (14):39-52. doi:10.4995/reinad.2018.7367 ; SWORD ; 39 ; 52 ; 14

In this paper we aim to discuss the best interest of the child as one of the one of the key principles and priorities to international and domestic law. The purpose of this study is to treat the legal aspect for best interest of the child especially related to adoption institute and on the possibility of children's adoption by homosexuals, identification of the most critic cases that are related with it, and ongoing debates about the composition of the family, because more and more homosexuals aim to adopt a child therefore it is very important to clarify the criteria that have to be considered by courts in order to guaranty the best interest of the child.

This book has been hard to criticize for one who, like this reviewer, agrees with its basic premises: (1) that the weakness of child protective capability requires a policy of minimum state intervention into family life, and (2) that when intervention occurs,it should be much more decisive. Yet, application of the rules that the authors suggest would be at great cost, not only to the endangered children whom they exclude from protection, but also to our own view of ourselves. Society cannot turn its back on the real and present suffering of children and still retain its sense of humanity,and society cannot deny workers and judges the discretion to make intervention fit the needs of the children and families involved without losing its sense of justice.Many people will brush aside this book's excesses because of their deep concern about the need to curtail governmental intervention into family life. Certainly, it helps to have this message reiterated by three such prominent persons. Unfortunately, the authors' simplistic approach and the criticism that it has already begun to generate" will obscure the child protection system's true deficiencies and the urgent need to remedy them.