Rights and Duties of Science
In: The Manchester School, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 175-193
ISSN: 1467-9957
129 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Manchester School, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 175-193
ISSN: 1467-9957
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 180, Heft 1, S. 248-248
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: American political science review, Band 31, S. 417-432
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uiug.30112119393970
"Compilation of laws used in this study": p. xvii-xx. ; Doris Stevens, chairman. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 185, Heft 1, S. 102-114
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: American political science review, Band 31, Heft 4, S. 638-658
ISSN: 1537-5943
Some Illustrations of Militant Democracy. Before a more systematic account of anti-fascist legislation in Europe is undertaken, recent developments in several countries may be reviewed as illustrating what militant democracy can achieve against subversive extremism when the will to survive is coupled with appropriate measures for combatting fascist techniques.1. Finland: From the start, the Finnish Republic was particularly exposed to radicalism both from left and right. The newly established state was wholly devoid of previous experience in self-government, shaken by violent nationalism, bordered by bolshevik Russia, yet within the orbit of German imperialism; no other country seemed more predestined to go fascist. Yet Finland staved off fascism as well as bolshevism. At first, the political situation was not unlike that of the Weimar Republic in the years of disintegration. The Communist party, declared illegal by the High Tribunal as early as 1925, reconstituted itself and, in 1929, obtained a large representation in the Riksdag, thereby blocking any constitutional reform. Under the decidedly extra-constitutional pressure of the nationalist and semi-fascist movement of the Lapuans, the Communists were so intimidated that nationalists, and progressives (bourgeois liberals), against the opposition of the social Democrats, were able to carry the constitutional reforms which not only strengthened the position of the government but also eventually barred subversive parties—meaning, at that time, the Communists—from national and communal representation.
In: American political science review, Band 32, S. 643-654
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: American political science review, Band 31, Heft 3, S. 417-432
ISSN: 1537-5943
Fascism a World Movement. Fascism is no longer an isolated incident in the individual history of a few countries. It has developed into a universal movement which in its seemingly irresistible surge is comparable to the rising of European liberalism against absolutism after the French Revolution. In one form or another, it covers today more areas and peoples in Europe and elsewhere than are still faithful to constitutional government. Fascism's pattern of political organization presents a variety of shades. One-party-controlled dictatorships rule outright in Italy, Germany, Turkey, and, if Franco wins, also Spain. The so-called "authoritarian" states may be classified as belonging to the one-party or multiple-party type. To the one-party authoritarian group, without genuine representative institutions, adhere at present Austria, Bulgaria, Greece, and Portugal; while Hungary, Rumania, Yugoslavia, Latvia, and Lithuania may be classed together as authoritarian states of the multiple-party type, with a semblance of parliamentary institutions.
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 175, Heft 1, S. 205-213
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 185, Heft 1, S. 170-181
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: Science & society: a journal of Marxist thought and analysis, Band 1, S. 273-309
ISSN: 0036-8237
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, S. 205-213
ISSN: 0002-7162
In: American political science review, Band 32, Heft 4, S. 643-654
ISSN: 1537-5943
In spite of all that has been written about Rousseau's political theory, he is still generally regarded as a proponent of the theory of natural rights. His political writings are thought to contain an exposition of that theory, and they are believed to have been highly influential in spreading it. Thus Professor Crane Brinton, writing in the Encyclopædia of the Social Sciences, says that although Rousseau added little to the actual dogmas of the theory of natural rights, "he did much to give it proselyting strength" and he "gave the doctrine of natural rights, hitherto endowed with the solid and effective but imaginatively limited prestige of nature as reality, as uniformity, and as the "golden mean," the additional prestige of nature as mystic strength, as magna mater." But it has already been shown that Rousseau's political doctrine was neither wellknown nor influential in France until the doctrine of natural rights lost its vogue and the authoritarian doctrines of Robespierre and the extremists of 1793 superseded it.
In: Johns Hopkins University studies in historical and political science 51,2
In: Canadian journal of economics and political science: the journal of the Canadian Political Science Association = Revue canadienne d'économique et de science politique, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 337-347
Federalism has been described by Dicey as "a political contrivance intended to reconcile national unity and power with the maintenance of 'state right'". Dr. Schmitt, a contemporary German student of federal institutions, has stated that "the nature of union consists in a dualism of the political existence, in a combination of federative common existence and political unity on the one hand with the continuance of plurality, of a pluralism of political individual unities, on the other". Lord Bryce had expressed the same thought in more picturesque language in his earlier study of federal institutions in the United States.The central or national government and the State governments may be compared to a large building and a set of smaller buildings standing on the same ground yet distinct from each other. It is a combination sometimes seen where a great church has been erected over more ancient homes of worship. First the soil is covered by a number of small shrines and chapels, built at different times and in different styles of architecture, each complete in itself. Then over them and including them all in its spacious fabric there is reared a new pile with its own loftier roof, its own walls, which may rest upon and incorporate the walls of the older shrines, its own internal plan. The identity of the earlier buildings has, however, not been obliterated; and if the later and larger structure were to disappear, a little repair would enable them to keep out wind and weather, and be again what they once were, distinct and separate edifices.