Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
61 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Forside -- Titelside -- Kolofon -- Indhold -- Forord -- 1. Unge og klimaforandringer -- 2. Klimaforandringer - svære at forstå -- 3. Klimavenlige værdier og handlinger -- 4. Hvad unge ved og ikke ved om klimaforandringer -- 5. Klima og politisk handlen -- 6.Klimalivsstile hos unge? -- 7. Verdenssyn som struktur for klimaopfattelser -- 8. Klimaforandringer og hverdagslivets praksisser -- 9. Klimaområdet - et nyt terræn -- Noter -- Appendiks. En flerhed af metoder -- Litteratur.
ISSN: 2617-6769
In recent years, the Swedish Armed Forces have produced and distributed highly edited video clips on YouTube that show moving images of military activity. Along- side this development, mobile phone apps have emerged as an important channel through which the user can experience and take an interactive part in the staging of contemporary armed conflict. This article examines the way in which the aes- thetic and affective experience of Swedish defence and security policy is socially and (media-)culturally (co-)constructed and how the official representation of Swedish military intervention (re)produces political and economic effects when these activi- ties are distributed through traditional and social media such as YouTube and digital apps. Based on Isabela and Norman Fairclough's thoughts on political discourse, Michel Foucault's dialectic idea of power/knowledge, and Sara Ahmed's concept of the affective, I discuss how the Swedish digital military aesthetic is part of a broader political and economic practice that has consequences beyond the digital, the semi- otic, and what might at first glance appear to be pure entertainment. ; In recent years, the Swedish Armed Forces have produced and distributed highly edited video clips on YouTube that show moving images of military activity. Alongside this development, mobile phone apps have emerged as an important channel through which the user can experience and take an interactive part in the staging of contemporary armed conflict. This article examines the way in which the aesthetic and affective experience of Swedish defence and security policy is socially and (media-)culturally (co-)constructed and how the official representation of Swedish military intervention (re)produces political and economic effects when these activities are distributed through traditional and social media such as YouTube and digital apps. Based on Isabela and Norman Fairclough's thoughts on political discourse, Michel Foucault's dialectic idea of power/knowledge, and Sara Ahmed's concept of the affective, I discuss how the Swedish digital military aesthetic is part of a broader political and economic practice which has consequences beyond the digital, the semiotic and what might at first glance appear to be pure entertainment.
BASE
Hvordan omsættes den sociale lovgivnings krav om brugerinddragelse, retssikkerhed og helhedsorienterende indsatser i praksis i forhold til udsatte grupper som misbrugere, sindslidende og torturofre?Det undersøges i Det sociale arbejdes daglige praksis, hvis bidrag bygger på etnografiske feltarbejder i det sociale arbejdes frontlinje - på væresteder, i bo- og behandlingstilbud
In: Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift: The Nordic journal of cultural policy, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 26-41
ISSN: 2000-8325
In: Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 43-58
ISSN: 2464-3076
In: Íslenskar kvikmyndir; Ritið, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 275-327
ISSN: 2298-8513
The astonishing range of writings about the social causes and consequences of the Icelandic 2008 financial crisis proffers a unique opportunity to analyse comparative-ly how scholars from different disciplines in the humanities and social sciences deal with one and the same subject. How does the scholarly approach differ regarding the employment of theories, hypotheses, empirical data and concepts? Is the methodology of the humanities noticeably different from that of the social sciences? Did the boundaries of philosophy and related sciences change in times of crisis, momentarily or permanently?