Suchergebnisse
Filter
27 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Vuibur Muvgqhul uv Vuivdusudav u Yagae Surqhaqhuli ardam sivzilagav u satgul najigam uv sivzilagu vuqaqhav u gablal: 内蒙古民族大学学报社会科学蒙古文版 = Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities social sciences Mongolian edition. Erdem sinǰilegen-ü sedgül = Mengwen = Mongolian edition
ISSN: 1671-0207
Da x́aćī qiyādat da islām la naẓara
Research study of the concept of woman as a leader; based on Koran and Hadith
Da ustād Muḥammad Akbar Pāmīr yād: da arwāx́ād Muḥammad Akbar Pāmīr da zokaŕē
Commemorative seminar on the 100th birth day anniversary of Muḥammad Akbar, Pāmīr, 1910 or 11-1972 or 3
Pa Kandahār kē da koranai ǧōŕax́t
Study of family structure in Kandahar, Afghanistan
Sabā ba nāwaḫta wī: da Afġānistān da ṯabāt au par maḫtag co masalē
On the social conditions and problems of Afghanistan in 21st century
Millī huwīyat au millī gat́ē
Study of social conditions of Afghanistan during 21st century
What matters most in institutional design for community-based rangeland management in Mongolia?
Includes bibliographical references. ; Presented at the Building resilience of Mongolian rangelands: a trans-disciplinary research conference held on June 9-10, 2015 in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. ; This study tested the effect of institutional design principles on social outcomes of evolving pastoral institutions in post-socialist Mongolia. Using data from 77 community-based rangeland management (CBRM) groups and 392 member households, we examined the effect of donor facilitation on institutional design. We found that donor facilitation approach significantly influenced group attributes and their external environment, but not institutional arrangements. The study confirmed that small group size, homogeneous interests, and heterogeneity of well-being are important group characteristics that predict higher levels of information diversity, leadership, and income diversity. Institutional arrangements such as the presence of sanctions, group-devised rules, frequent meetings, and recording documents increased cooperation, rules, and information diversity. Similarly, access to training and local government support provided a favorable external environment for increasing social outcomes. Furthermore, group characteristics such as dependence on livestock, homogeneity of interests, and leader legitimacy were critical for increasing social capital, livelihoods, sustainable rangeland practices, and proactive behavior of members. More frequent meetings of leaders were the most influential for these outcomes. Local government support and available donor support were associated with increased trust and norms of reciprocity, sustainable rangeland management practices, proactiveness, and livestock holdings. Lastly, group attributes and external environment influenced social outcomes of pastoral CBRMs in Mongolia more than institutional arrangements.
BASE