The article analyzes the basic provisions of the draft federal law "On science, technology and innovation activities in the Russian Federation" related to research and innovation infrastructure. The author presents a comparative analysis of the draft law and the norms of the current federal legislation and other normative acts regulating research and innovation infrastructure. The main methods of the research are comparative, technical, analytical and descriptive. In comparison with the current laws, the draft law gives a fuller description of the research infrastructure, in particular, the definitions of its main objects and components (research equipment, scientific collection, unique scientific installation, core facility, megascience installation, fund to support science, etc.). However, there is still no systematic approach to the issue: the draft law doesn't contain neither the definitions of the research infrastructure and its structural features, nor the precise formulation of the relationship between research and innovation infrastructure. All these gaps don't allow obtaining a single interpretation of the research infrastructure, and is a significant disadvantage of the bill. In its further development, the author also recommends taking into account the foreign experience, especially in regulating scientific collections. For example, it is necessary to consider enshrining scientific collections as bioresource centers to provide an opportunity for their subsequent integration with international databases. The article considers the novel about the core facility as an independent legal entity. In addition, the need for creation of the Registry of core shared research facilities, which is stated in the bill, is questionable, given that the web-portal "Research infrastructure of the Russian Federation" (http://ckp-rf.ru) has been successfully operating since 2011. The latest contains information not only about the core facilities, but also unique scientific installations, as well as the results of their ...
This article analyses the latest archaeographical research in the field of Lithuanian Tatar written manuscript heritage. The author gives her answer to the question: was the work of fixing, collecting and description of Lithuanian Tatar manuscripts purposeful. The main emphasis is put on the work stage and its specific character. Archaeography has not always fulfilled tasks equally throughout different historical periods starting with Lithuanian Tatar written language presentation to wide academic society (Fleischer 1838, Muchlinskij 1858) and up to nowadays. While catalogization of manuscripts existed (1935, 1961, 1968, 1997, 2000 and 2003), it was not purposeful since "field archaeography" had been omitted. The publication of complete texts was ascribed to episodical (2000, 2001). Urgency of catalogization and description of manuscripts was based on changes of the situation inside society and also outside it. Nowadays manuscripts in Tatar families are rarity. Because the social and political situation has changed, the approach to this treasury is weakly controlled. Purposeful archaeographical research could assist in saving Lithuanian Tatar cultural heritage and also to analyse it from many perspectives.
This article analyses the latest archaeographical research in the field of Lithuanian Tatar written manuscript heritage. The author gives her answer to the question: was the work of fixing, collecting and description of Lithuanian Tatar manuscripts purposeful. The main emphasis is put on the work stage and its specific character. Archaeography has not always fulfilled tasks equally throughout different historical periods starting with Lithuanian Tatar written language presentation to wide academic society (Fleischer 1838, Muchlinskij 1858) and up to nowadays. While catalogization of manuscripts existed (1935, 1961, 1968, 1997, 2000 and 2003), it was not purposeful since "field archaeography" had been omitted. The publication of complete texts was ascribed to episodical (2000, 2001). Urgency of catalogization and description of manuscripts was based on changes of the situation inside society and also outside it. Nowadays manuscripts in Tatar families are rarity. Because the social and political situation has changed, the approach to this treasury is weakly controlled. Purposeful archaeographical research could assist in saving Lithuanian Tatar cultural heritage and also to analyse it from many perspectives.
This article analyses the latest archaeographical research in the field of Lithuanian Tatar written manuscript heritage. The author gives her answer to the question: was the work of fixing, collecting and description of Lithuanian Tatar manuscripts purposeful. The main emphasis is put on the work stage and its specific character. Archaeography has not always fulfilled tasks equally throughout different historical periods starting with Lithuanian Tatar written language presentation to wide academic society (Fleischer 1838, Muchlinskij 1858) and up to nowadays. While catalogization of manuscripts existed (1935, 1961, 1968, 1997, 2000 and 2003), it was not purposeful since "field archaeography" had been omitted. The publication of complete texts was ascribed to episodical (2000, 2001). Urgency of catalogization and description of manuscripts was based on changes of the situation inside society and also outside it. Nowadays manuscripts in Tatar families are rarity. Because the social and political situation has changed, the approach to this treasury is weakly controlled. Purposeful archaeographical research could assist in saving Lithuanian Tatar cultural heritage and also to analyse it from many perspectives.
This article analyses the latest archaeographical research in the field of Lithuanian Tatar written manuscript heritage. The author gives her answer to the question: was the work of fixing, collecting and description of Lithuanian Tatar manuscripts purposeful. The main emphasis is put on the work stage and its specific character. Archaeography has not always fulfilled tasks equally throughout different historical periods starting with Lithuanian Tatar written language presentation to wide academic society (Fleischer 1838, Muchlinskij 1858) and up to nowadays. While catalogization of manuscripts existed (1935, 1961, 1968, 1997, 2000 and 2003), it was not purposeful since "field archaeography" had been omitted. The publication of complete texts was ascribed to episodical (2000, 2001). Urgency of catalogization and description of manuscripts was based on changes of the situation inside society and also outside it. Nowadays manuscripts in Tatar families are rarity. Because the social and political situation has changed, the approach to this treasury is weakly controlled. Purposeful archaeographical research could assist in saving Lithuanian Tatar cultural heritage and also to analyse it from many perspectives.
Open Science Café - Open Research Europe: la nuova piattaforma di pubblicazione aperta della Commissione europea Breve sommario: Open Research Europe (ORE) è la piattaforma di pubblicazione scientifica finanziata dalla Commissione Europea. Ilaria Fava ha seguito per OpenAIRE la messa a punto dello strumento, ne ha approfondito tutte le novità e presenterà la piattaforma alla comunità italiana. Data e ora: Giovedì 11 marzo 2021 dalle 13.50 alle 15.00 Programma: 13:50 – 14:00 Apertura del collegamento e benvenuto 14:00 - 14:10 Introduzione 14:10 - 14:35 Presentazione a cura di Ilaria Fava 14: 35 – 15:00 Q&A/Discussione Chi interverrà Ilaria Fava lavora da anni a progetti europei dedicati all'Open Science. Di recente ha lavorato ad RDA Europe e alla promozione delle buone pratiche per la condivisione dei dati della ricerca. Per OpenAIRE è responsabile delle attività di disseminazione e comunicazione, e ha seguito lo sviluppo di ORE, interagendo con il team di F1000 che ha realizzato e gestisce la piattaforma. Destinatari Il webinar è realizzato per la comunità italiana coinvolta in progetti di ricerca finanziati dalla Commissione Europea nei programmi Horizon 2020 o Horizon Europe. Si rivolge a ricercatori, personale di supporto alla ricerca, tecnici, tecnologi interessati a conoscere i dettagli della nuova piattaforma e come questa si inserisce nelle politiche della Commissione Europea in materia di Open Science. Il Competence Center di ICDI: Il Competence Center di ICDI (CC-ICDI) è formato da una rete di esperti, iniziative e infrastrutture di ricerca con varie competenze funzionali al supporto della comunità nazionale per l'Open Science, principi FAIR e per la partecipazione italiana alla European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). La formazione e l'informazione su temi e novità del panorama nazionale ed europeo rappresentano una delle attività principali del CC-ICDI, che può contare su competenze presenti all'interno di enti di ricerca, università e infrastrutture di ricerca tematiche e trasversali. Open Science ...
This article analyses the latest archaeographical research in the field of Lithuanian Tatar written manuscript heritage. The author gives her answer to the question: was the work of fixing, collecting and description of Lithuanian Tatar manuscripts purposeful. The main emphasis is put on the work stage and its specific character.Archaeography has not always fulfilled tasks equally throughout different historical periods starting with Lithuanian Tatar written language presentation to wide academic society (Fleischer 1838, Muchlinskij 1858) and up to nowadays. While catalogization of manuscripts existed (1935, 1961, 1968, 1997, 2000 and 2003), it was not purposeful since "field archaeography" had been omitted. The publication of complete texts was ascribed to episodical (2000, 2001).Urgency of catalogization and description of manuscripts was based on changes of the situation inside society and also outside it. Nowadays manuscripts in Tatar families are rarity. Because the social and political situation has changed, the approach to this treasury is weakly controlled. Purposeful archaeographical research could assist in saving Lithuanian Tatar cultural heritage and also to analyse it from many perspectives. ; В статье рассматриваются проблемы археографических исследований в области татаристики. Автор ставит перед собой цель определить этапы и специфику подобных исследований с момента открытия памятников письменной культуры литовских татар.
The paper focuses on structural analysis as a method of political research. The author attempts to demonstrate some features of this method distinguishing it from the American structural functionalism. At the same time, the use of discourse analysis method is explored, as well as the application of structuralist methodologies to the study of the phenomenon of political power. The author comes to the conclusion that using this method to investigate the the current political situation extends the methodological potential of political science as a branch of knowledge. ; Статья посвящена использованию структурного анализа применительно к исследованию политической проблематики. Автор пытается продемонстрировать отличительные характеристики данного метода от американского структурного функционализма. Вместе с тем, в данном исследовании происходит рассмотрение использования метода дискурс-анализа, а также применение структуралистской методологии к исследованию феномена политической власти. Автор приходит к выводам, что использование данного метода в исследовании современной политической ситуации расширяет методологический потенциал политологии как отрасли знания.
Цель данного исследования – сравнительный анализ мировых научных школ исследования феномена социального предпринимательства. Для достижения данной цели был проведен обзор англоязычных и отечественных научных статей, представленных в международных и российском индексах научного цитирования, в частности Scopus, WoS, eLIBRARY, а также отчетов международных и российских организации?, занимающихся исследованием и развитием данного вида деятельности. Методической базой исследования выступили методы анализа и синтеза, категоризации и систематизации. В результате проведенного анализа в статье описаны две основные традиции исследования социального предпринимательства – американская и европейская. Различия данных подходов связаны с особенностями исторического развития и, как следствие, сложившейся институциональной средой в европейских странах и США. В рамках данной традиции выявлено четыре научных школы, проведен их сравнительный анализ по следующим критериям: объект исследования, юридическая форма объектов социального предпринимательства, их инновационность, получение и распределение прибыли, а также форма управления. Представлены результаты исследования развития социального предпринимательства в России в рамках фонда «Наше будущее», специализирующегося на поддержке социального предпринимательства, российского законодательства и Центра социального предпринимательства и социальных инноваций НИУ «Высшая школа экономики». Данный анализ продемонстрировал существенное влияние американского подхода к определению сущности социального предпринимательства в российской практике. При этом отмечена перспективность развития данного вида деятельности при активной государственной поддержке, что соответствует европейской традиции. ; This study compares world research schools of social entrepreneurship. To achieve this goal, the authors analyzed papers presented in the Scopus and WoS databases; they also reviewed reports of international and Russian organizations engaged in social entrepreneurship, comparing foreign experience and the practice of social entrepreneurship development in the Russian economy. In the course of the study, the authors used a systematization method, which allowed identifying the main schools and centers for the study of social entrepreneurship, their features, and characteristics. This paper describes two main traditions of social entrepreneurship research: American and European. The differences in these approaches are associated with the peculiarities of historical development and, as a result, the prevailing institutional environment in European countries and the USA. Within the framework of this tradition, four research schools were identified. Their comparative analysis was carried out according to the following criteria: the object of study, the legal form of social entrepreneurship objects, their innovativeness, the receipt and distribution of profits, and the form of management. The results show the social entrepreneurship development in Russia within the framework of the Foundation «Our Future», specializing in supporting social entrepreneurship, Russian legislation, and the Center for Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovations of the Higher School of Economics. This analysis demonstrates the significant influence of the American approach to the definition of the essence of social entrepreneurship in Russian practice. At the same time, the outlook for the development of this type of activity was noted with active state support, which corresponds to the European tradition.
As the investment expectations for EdTech businesses have been growing during the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, there is a need to reflect critically about the pedagogical implications of trends like datafication, platformisation and technological solutionism. Recently, social science fiction has been used to stimulate critical, sociological imagination about the future uses of educational technology (Macgilchrist et al., 2020; Selwyn et al., 2020). This paper expands the use of social science fiction for the current Italian context as a method for critical analysis in research and in teacher education. Two vignettes are developed to illustrate two scenarios of possible configurations of educational technology within primary schools in the year 2026. It is shown how opposite technological configurations manifest different under- lying pedagogical assumptions regarding children and teacher agency, literacy and the politics of knowledge. By relating the use of educational media to issues of pedagogy and didactics, writing and discussing social science fiction provides a significant opportunity to promote reflexive uses of technology in education. ; Con l'apparizione del COVID-19 e la DaD a livello globale il settore EdTech (educational technology) celebra nuove opportunità di investimento e di crescità. Questo rende necessario riflettere criticamente sulle implicazioni pedagogiche di tendenze come la datafication, la platformisation e il soluzionismo tecnologico. Recentemente, la social science fiction è stata utilizzata per stimolare l'immaginazione critica sugli usi futuri della tecnologia educativa (Macgilchrist et al., 2020; Selwyn et al., 2020). Il presente lavoro pro- pone la social science fiction nel contesto attuale italiano come un metodo di analisi critica da usare nella ricerca e nella formazione degli insegnanti. Attraverso la scrittura di due vignette vengono illustrati due possibili scenari sull'uso di tecnologie educative nelle scuole primarie nell'anno 2026: due configurazioni tecnologiche opposte ...
The paper reviews the monograph "Theory and Methods of Linguistic Analysis of Political Text" (execu-tive editor A.P. Chudinov, Ekaterinburg, 2016). The aim of the book under review is to determine the object, subject, theory and methodology of political linguistics, and its place among the interconnected disciplines. ; В статье представлена рецензия на монографию "Теория и методика лингвистического анализа политического текста", целью которой является определение методологии политической лингвистики и ее статуса в ряду смежных дисциплин.
Science is facing a fundamental turning point of its history. Never as in this historical moment it appears giant and powerful, but at the same time it shows high fragility: the concentration of information control power in the hands of few commercial groups, the iniquity of a system that benefits developed countries, the restriction of academic autonomy by political and economic power, the precariousness of working conditions of young researchers, the increase in the number of cases of scientific fraud and misconduct, the questioning of its authority by a portion of the public. Can openness be understood as a system capable of strengthening science and treating the diseases that afflict it?
The article is devoted to the peculiarities of the formal research methods in political science and the use of such methods in Russian comparative political and international studies, in particular at MGIMO-University. The author calls not to run to extremes when dealing with these methods, analyzing their advantages and limitations. ; Статья посвящена особенностям использования формализованных методов, а также их применения в российской политологической школе, в частности в МГИМО-Университете в сравнительных политических и международных исследованиях. Автор призывает к отказу от крайностей в отношении к данным методам, анализируя возможности и ограничения их использования.
Research is one of the fundamental bases of university teaching. The contemporary university operates as a learning, scientific and practical complex which connects and harmonizes learning (knowledge transfer), scientific (systematization and generation of new knowledge) and practical (knowledge application) functions. The task of the teacher is to encourage the student to discover new heights in their profession, to teach them to construct research optimally and organizationally correctly and thereby not only to prepare a specialist needed by the country and the society, but also to educate a harmonious personality.Research in the broad sense is a system of measures which familiarizes a person with creative activities, contributes to professional skills development and forms a high level of intellectual, emotional, and social environment. Specific forms of research can be divided into two unequal blocks. The first is research work integrated in the learning process (workshop, report, abstract, etc.). The second is extracurricular activities (competitions, contests, work in student clubs, etc.). In the narrow sense, research process is an activity designed to build and prove hypotheses, as well as to form new approaches and concepts.The fundamental difference between scientific research and all other types and forms of research activity as seen by the author is its ability, and even duty, to penetrate deeper than superficial understanding of phenomena, which is not possible without the infatuation for the object of analysis, without imagination. So the answer to the question "What should any research work and scientific research in particular start with?" is obvious. It should start with interest, passion, desire to learn the unknown, to penetrate into hidden, deep and even secret causes of social phenomena. Only a passionate teacher is able to reveal and develop this interest in a student.The article provides methodological guidelines for the organization of the research work of the students of political science faculties. Emphasis is made on the disclosure of problem zones (hypothesis formulation, disclosure of the object and subject, concepts selection and so on) in writing a research paper, whether it is a term, graduation or master's paper. ; Исследовательская работа является одной из фундаментальных основ вузовского преподавания. Современный университет действует как учебно-научно-практический комплекс, соединяя и гармонизируя учебную (передача знаний), научную (систематизация и выработка новых знаний) и практическую (применение знаний) функции. Подвигнуть студента к открытию новых вершин в своей профессии, научить его оптимально и организационно верно выстраивать исследовательскую работу и тем самым не только подготовить нужного стране и обществу специалиста, но и воспитать гармоничную личность — задача преподавателя.Исследовательская работа в широком смысле есть система мероприятий, приобщающая к творческой деятельности, способствующая развитию профессиональных навыков и формирующая высокий уровень интеллектуальной, эмоциональной и социальной среды. Конкретные формы исследовательской работы можно разделить на два неравных блока. Первый — исследовательская работа, встроенная в учебный процесс (семинар, доклад, реферат и т. д.). Второй — внеучебная активность (олимпиады, конкурсы, работа в студенческих клубах и т. д.). В узком понимании исследовательский процесс — деятельность, предполагающая построение и доказательство гипотез, формирование новых подходов и концепций.Принципиальным отличием научного исследования от всех иных видов и форм исследовательской деятельности видится его способность и даже обязанность проникать глубже поверхностного понимания явлений, что невозможно без увлеченности предметом анализа, без воображения. Поэтому ответ на вопрос «С чего должна начинаться любая исследовательская работа, и научное исследование в частности?» — очевиден. Она должна начинаться с интереса, с увлеченности, с желания узнать неизведанное, проникнуть в скрытые, глубинные и даже тайные причины общественных явлений. Выявить и развить этот интерес у студента способен только увлеченный педагог.Статья содержит методические рекомендации по организации научно-исследовательской работы студентов-политологов. Акцент сделан на раскрытии проблемных зон (формулировка гипотезы, выявление объекта, предмета, выбор понятий и др.) написания научного исследования, будь то курсовая, диплом или магистерская работа.
Секция 2. Методологический потенциал современной философии ; Рассматривается взаимосвязь философии и социально-гуманитарных наук в двух основных аспектах. Диахронических аспект характеризует особенности становления и развития наук об обществе и статусе человека в нем, начиная с XVII века. Характеризуется специфика и проблемное поле четырех основных этапов в развитии обществознания – классический этап, этап институционализации социально-гуманитарных наук, этапы неклассического и современного постнеклассического обществознания. Синхронический (функциональный) аспект анализа темы предполагает экспликацию взаимодействия философии и социальных наук на основе существования у них взаимного прагматического интереса. Он осуществляется в трех ракурсах, Во-первых, существования исследовательских программ в обществознании, во-вторых, существования междисциплинарных систем знания об обществе – политической, экономической и др. философии, в-третьих, координации тематических разделов в программах и практике преподавания этих дисциплин. ; The article discusses correlation between philosophy and social science in two principal aspects. Diachronic aspect characterizes the special features in evolution of the branch of sciences studying society and human from XVII century. The specificity and problematic area of four main stages in history of social science is characterized (including classic stage, stage of social science institutionalization, stages of non-classic and post-non-classic social science). Synchronic (functional) aspect explicates the cooperation between philosophy and social science because of mutual pragmatic interest. It reveals in three ways: in research programs in social science; in cross-disciplinary systems of social knowledge such as political, economic philosophy, etc.; in coordination of thematic parts in programmes and practice of teaching of these courses.
