Suchergebnisse

Секция 2. Методологический потенциал современной философии ; Рассматривается взаимосвязь философии и социально-гуманитарных наук в двух основных аспектах. Диахронических аспект характеризует особенности становления и развития наук об обществе и статусе человека в нем, начиная с XVII века. Характеризуется специфика и проблемное поле четырех основных этапов в развитии обществознания – классический этап, этап институционализации социально-гуманитарных наук, этапы неклассического и современного постнеклассического обществознания. Синхронический (функциональный) аспект анализа темы предполагает экспликацию взаимодействия философии и социальных наук на основе существования у них взаимного прагматического интереса. Он осуществляется в трех ракурсах, Во-первых, существования исследовательских программ в обществознании, во-вторых, существования междисциплинарных систем знания об обществе – политической, экономической и др. философии, в-третьих, координации тематических разделов в программах и практике преподавания этих дисциплин. ; The article discusses correlation between philosophy and social science in two principal aspects. Diachronic aspect characterizes the special features in evolution of the branch of sciences studying society and human from XVII century. The specificity and problematic area of four main stages in history of social science is characterized (including classic stage, stage of social science institutionalization, stages of non-classic and post-non-classic social science). Synchronic (functional) aspect explicates the cooperation between philosophy and social science because of mutual pragmatic interest. It reveals in three ways: in research programs in social science; in cross-disciplinary systems of social knowledge such as political, economic philosophy, etc.; in coordination of thematic parts in programmes and practice of teaching of these courses.

The concept of scientific infrastructure in the interpretation adopted in the European Union is considered. It is indicated that this is a modern form of organization of scientific information services. The structure of European organizations and projects forming the scientific infrastructure of European organizations is described. The activities of European consortia of scientific infrastructure of social and humanitarian profile, including information resources and services implemented in these consortia, are described in particular detail. It is concluded that the European experience can be very useful for the development of scientific information services in Russia. ; Рассматривается понятие научной инфраструктуры в трактовке, принятой в Евросоюзе. Указывается, что это является современной формой организации служб научной информации. Описывается структура европейских организаций и проектов, образующих научную инфраструктуру европейских организаций. Подробно описывается деятельность европейских консорциумов научной инфраструктуры социального и гуманитарного профиля, в том числе, информационных ресурсов и сервисов, реализованных в этих консорциумах. Делается вывод, что европейский опыт может быть очень полезен для развития служб научной информации в России.

Issues of research methodology have always been important for social sciences. In the contemporary world, globalizational challenges and economic crises both change the society dramatically and reveal the weakness of the explanatory capability of many conventional theories. Thus examining the theoretical and methodological foundations of contemporary social science proves a highly important challenge.In our opinion, substantiated in the article, many underlying reasons for the contemporary systemic crisis have arisen because many fundamental concepts in social sciences fail to adequately reflect the changing reality, including the crises in global economy, politics and interethnic relations. Social sciences often can neither predict these processes nor explain their causes and nature.We contend that the weakness of the explanatory capability of social science is due to its being founded on the Newtonian-Cartesian metaparadigm, which, in its turn, rests upon the laws of the macrocosm — while the contemporary world has actually become akin to a microcosm.We conclude that the existing categorical apparatus needs reviewing and refining, which will consequently lead to a development of a new metaparadigm of thinking. ; Для общественной науки проблемы методологии всегда представляют чрезвычайно важную задачу. Особенно эта значимость возрастает в современном мире, когда глобализационные вызовы и экономические кризисы не только кардинально меняют общество, но и наглядно демонстрируют слабость объяснительного потенциала многих традиционных теорий. Отсюда чрезвычайно важным представляется анализ теоретико-методологической базы современной общественной науки.В статье обосновывается мысль о том, что причины современного системного кризиса объясняются тем, что многие фундаментальные понятия общественной науки не совсем адекватно отражают изменившуюся реальность, в частности кризисные процессы и явления в области мировой экономики, политики, межэтнических отношений. Общественные науки часто не способны не только предсказать, но и объяснить причины и сущность этих процессов.Согласно мнению автора слабость объяснительного потенциала общественной науки состоит в том, что она до сих пор основывается на ньютоно-картезианской метапарадигме, которая, в свою очередь, базируется на законах макромира, в то время как современный мир стал фактически похожим на микромир.Отсюда необходимы пересмотр и уточнение существующего категориального аппарата и, соответственно, поиск и разработка новой метапарадигмы мышления.

The book presents issues of functioning of the regional economy of the Omsk region as an integral part of the economic complex of Western Siberia, analyzes the forms and methods of state regulation, are specific examples of economic practice. The widespread use of legal documents and statistical data provides a clear picture of the economic processes taking place in the Omsk region.

The book presents issues of functioning of the regional economy of the Omsk region as an integral part of the economic complex of Western Siberia, analyzes the forms and methods of state regulation, are specific examples of economic practice. The widespread use of legal documents and statistical data provides a clear picture of the economic processes taking place in the Omsk region.

The book presents issues of functioning of the regional economy of the Omsk region as an integral part of the economic complex of Western Siberia, analyzes the forms and methods of state regulation, are specific examples of economic practice. The widespread use of legal documents and statistical data provides a clear picture of the economic processes taking place in the Omsk region.

The book presents issues of functioning of the regional economy of the Omsk region as an integral part of the economic complex of Western Siberia, analyzes the forms and methods of state regulation, are specific examples of economic practice. The widespread use of legal documents and statistical data provides a clear picture of the economic processes taking place in the Omsk region.

This article considers the subject of interdisciplinary interaction among specialists working in exact and social sciences as a practice of exchanging ideas about social reality; mutual adaptation of these ideas; empirical verification of the universal formal logic rules applied to specific tasks of sociological research. Such formulation of the subject goes beyond the problem of adapting educational programs to "literacy classes" for potential partners. It is maintained that in inter-professional communication it is important to formulate conceptual systems of common use not "in general", not for all possible cases, but with regard to the problem addressed by consolidated effort. For such conceptual systems we use the term "common language area" according to the ideas of epistemologists (Ilya Kasavin). Elements of these conceptual systems include paradigms, concepts, tools and procedures mobilized for collaborative work. Readers are offered a description of the experience of cooperation between mathematicians and sociologists in 1990 – 2010s in the qualitative analysis of sociological data — which is an area of concern for both sociology and exact methods. To find a cooperative solution, we needed to develop a system of basic propositions regarding the object and purpose of the research; to put together a structure of sociological data suitable for using the proposed formal tool; to carry out empirical verification of the formalized language of logic-mathematical reasoning. This work has made it possible to explicate the opportunities and limitations when it comes to interpreting results. The article draws conclusions about the specifics of communication in a team of specialists, including sociologists and mathematicians, and about the development of a common language area in the field of cooperation that deals with qualitative analysis of sociological data. Our experience of cooperation in using formalized qualitative analysis of sociological data shows that, when it comes to the need to solve a common problem, partner role relations turned out to be the most effective (rather than role pairs such as "teacher-student" or "seller-buyer").

The article, which is addressed to a wide range of readers, but first of all to University teachers, graduate students and students, outlines a wide range of views on the institution of the state of social scientists of different times and peoples: from ancient thinkers to modern authorities. Discussion of the latest trends in the development of this Institute in the late twentieth and first decades of the XXI century is the subject of the author's research. The article analyzes the futurist ideas about the state related to forecasts of the progress of information technologies, as well as ideas about the dynamics of relations between state power and society. Special sections of the article are devoted to: the evolutionary concept of the state; the challenges that States face in the context of the next technological (fourth industrial) revolution; the discourse on the discrepancy between formal and real citizenship as the reverse side of the extraterritoriality of the state.