Suchergebnisse

Delegation of authority itself, as an element of the system of relations in the sphere of local self-government, is one of the most difficult, since the completeness of the competences of local self-government bodies and their resource provision occupy a central place in the scientific discourse on this issue. The legal and organizational support of delegation is also unstable today from the point of view of the completeness of the mechanisms of administrative and legal regulation of this direction of the implementation of the right to self- government by communities. In the context of the administrative reform, the consolidation of administrative-territorial units, the stimulation of the creation of united territorial communities, the question of finding the most optimal model for organizing delegation, as a process of redistribution of powers, acquires particular relevance and importance. The aim of the research is to study the formation of legal regulation of delegation of powers in the system of local self- government in Ukraine. The article defines the content of legal regulation, which is characterized by such elements as form, subject and methods. Review that the forms of legal regulation are normative legal acts adopted according to the procedures by authorized public authorities, the subject of regulation of which is the process of delegation of powers in the local self-government system. The author revealed that the idea of local self-government, provides for the decentralization of power, organizational and financial autonomy of self- government bodies, contradicted the doctrine of the socialist state, as well as the task of the state of the proletarian dictatorship, was centralized by nature. It has been substantiated that the adoption of the Law of Ukraine dated May 21, 1997 No. 280/97-ВР "On local self-government in Ukraine" became a decisive step towards creating a system of local self-government in Ukraine, effective organizational and legal support for the delegation of powers in the local self- government system. By means of retrospective analysis, it was determined that the idea of local self-government, provides for the decentralization of power, organizational and financial autonomy of self-government bodies, contradicted the doctrine of the socialist state, as well as the task of the state of the proletarian dictatorship, was centralized by nature.

Historiographical analysis allows us to trace the development of logic and the level of development of the problem under study in historical science, including identifying important aspects, trends and features of the implementation of the governor's power in the Voronezh Province during 1796-1914, and determine the prospects for further study of this scientific topic.

In article investigates definition of "system" of local government on the basis of constitutional and legislative regulation. Introduced a new approach to classification of local self-government bodies on two groups — obligatory and elective with their subsequent separation. The definition of the system of local self-government bodies and system of public authorities of federal territories is given. The content of the concept of "unity of the system of public power" is revealed in relation to the system of local self-government bodies. In addition, authors once again confirmed justness inclusion of system of local self-government bodies into single system of public authority in the state.

The article explores the systems of local self-government in the post-Soviet states. Building a democratic rule of law implies the creation of an effective decentralized system of public authority, based on the supremacy of the will of the people and the priority of the person as the highest social value. However, these tasks cannot be accomplished without building a full-fledged local government system. It is noted that Ukraine has taken the course of accession to the European Union, which has made it necessary to bring national legislation to the level of European and world legal standards. In addition, today the question in which direction local self-government will develop in the post-Soviet states is particularly acute, whether this institute will be able to solve the tasks that are entrusted to it and what problems must be solved for the favorable development of the local self-government system. It is determined that the ratification of such an important document as the European Charter of Local Self- Government by Ukraine defined the new principles of organization and functioning of the whole system of local self-government, as well as introduced the newest democratic directions for its improvement and effective reform in the conditions of building a legal democratic state, but without -Legal documents regulating the processes of formation and development of the system of local self-government, study of the current state of localities These democracies show a low level of effectiveness of the current local self-government system in Ukraine. It has been determined that the system of local self-government of each individual post-Soviet state functions within a certain political culture and traditions, its peculiarities are caused by many, sometimes invisible, factors connected with the surrounding socio- political environment, therefore, it is impossible to give an unambiguous assessment of one or another local system self-government, even within the specific political and administrative context; it is even more difficult to determine how it will operate and function in the case of its transfer and implementation in our country. The necessity to apply the positive experience of the post-Soviet states in the field of local self-government in creating a quality system of local self- government in Ukraine is emphasized. ; У статті досліджено системи місцевого самоврядування в пострадянських державах. Побудова демократичної правової держави передбачає створення ефективної децентралізованої системи публічної влади, яка ґрунтувалася б на верховенстві волі народу та пріори- теті людини як найвищої соціальної цінності. Однак, зазначені завдання неможливо реалізувати без розбудови повноцінної системи місцевого самоврядування. Зазначено, що Україна взяла курс на вступ до Європейського Союзу, що зумовило необхідність приведення національного законодавства до рівня європейських та світових правових стандартів. Крім того, саме сьогодні особливо гостро постало питання в якому саме напрямку буде розвиватися місцеве самоврядування в пострадянських державах, чи зможе цей інститут вирішити задачі, які на нього покладаються і які проблеми необхідно вирішити для сприятливого розвитку системи місцевого самоврядування. Визначено, що ратифікація тако- го найважливішого документу, як Європейська хартія місцевого самоврядування Україною визначила нові принципи організації та функціонування всієї системи місцевого самоврядування, а також запровадила новітні демократичні напрямки її вдосконалення та дієвого реформу- вання в умовах побудови правової демократичної держави, але, незважаючи на значний обсяг норматив- но-правових документів, які регла- ментують процеси становлення та розвитку системи місцевого самоврядування, дослідження сучасного стану місцевої демократії показують низький рівень ефективності діючої в Україні системи місцевого самоврядування. Визначено, що система місцевого самоврядування кожної окремої пострадянської держави функціонує в межах певної політичної культури і традицій, особливості її обумовлені багатьма, інколи непомітними, чинниками, пов'язаними з оточуючим соціально-політичним середовищем, тому, неможливо дати однозначну оцінку тієї чи іншої системи місцевого самоврядування навіть у межах характерного для неї політико-адміністративного контексту; ще важче визначити, як вона буде діяти та функціонувати в разі її перенесення та запровадження в нашій державі. Наголошено на необхідність застосування позивного досвіду пострадянських держав в сфері місцевого самоврядування в створенні якісної системи місцевого самоврядування України.

Through a documentary research design that combined induction and deduction, comparison and systematization, synthesis and analysis with abstract-logical thinking. The main objective of the study was to identify the key aspects of the legislative support rules in the countries of the European Union, in the field of building a system of local self-government. The European Union during the history of its existence has developed a set of rules on which the systems of local self-government of member states and applicants for this status are built. The complexity and importance of legislative regulation of the functioning of this system is evidenced by the fact that the legislation and principles of international law used by the union in the field of local self-government are among the "youngest". It is concluded that this is due to the role of local self-government in the development of a democratic political system, as well as the search for an optimal balance between centralization and decentralization. As a result of the study, current trends and prerequisites for legislative support standards in European Union countries were investigated.

The development of the countries of Eastern Europe as a democratic legal state is primarily determined by how rational and efficient the organization of state power is. Recently, one can observe a tendency for riveted attention to change from central to local government, which is represented by local authorities. Local self-government is one of the fundamental democratic foundations of the constitutional system in postmodern society. That is why its modern transformation is being updated by the role of the most important factor in the development of the entire system of Ukrainian statehood. And having chosen the European direction as the vector of external integration, it became expedient to study the experience of countries that have gone through a complex, but progressive, path of reform in a postmodern society. Comparing the European integration aspirations with the program of changes that Ukraine needs, one should choose the right benchmark on which one can or must rely on in the process of modern institutionalization of the power system. In our opinion, the option of choosing a country of permanent democracy, which have gone the path of many years of change, containing revolutionary upheavals, and have a specific historical development, is erroneous. But neighboring European countries, not only bordering Ukraine, but have also gone through similar stages of development, can set the basic vector for domestic institutional changes. For a long time, the Interstate Association of the Visegrad Four Countries has been a partner and conductor of Ukraine's foreign policy.

In the article, the main features of the French system of local self-government are considered. It is found that the association of communes, along with such levels of local self-government as communes, departments, regions and territorial communities with a special status, is an important component of this system.The main components of this system are described and it is found that territorial communities of different levels are autonomous, as there is no subordination and control between them. The position of association of communes in the system of local self-government is also determined. It is found that the French state, despite being the undisputed leader among other European countries by the number of small and sparsely populated communes, instead of forcibly consolidating territorial communities, prefers their voluntary unification.The influence of the process of decentralization as well as the main stages of municipal and administrative reforms on the development of the association of territorial communities is also analyzed. The normative-legal basis of the reform, which determined the structure of the French system of local self-government, is considered.Particular attention is paid to the legislative consolidation of the mechanisms of unification of communes, in particular, the law on strengthening and simplifying inter-communal cooperation, the law on reforming territorial communities as well as the law on the new territorial organization of the Republic.It is found that the unification is formed not only through merging several territorial communities into one and then creating a new commune on their basis, but primarily on the principles of the development of intercommunal cooperation.It is considered that, in the second direction, the French legislation offers a number of types of association of communes. After all, the expansion of cooperation and various legal forms of such associations provide an opportunity for local communities not only to preserve their identity, but also to increase the efficiency of government to provide qualified services to the population.Having considered the results obtained, it is concluded that the French state contributes in every way to the development of voluntary associations of communes, especially supports such associations, which are created on the basis of intercommunal cooperation. This suggests that such structures are effective and can be an effective means of leveling territories development. In view of the above, the positive experience of the French state can be used to reform local self-government and territorial organization of power in Ukraine as well as used for further research in this area. ; Розглянуто основні особливості французької системи місцевого самоврядування. З'ясовано, що обєднання комун поряд із такими рівнями місцевого самоврядування, як комуни, департаменти, регіони і територіальні спільноти з особливим статусом, є важли-вим компонентом цієї системи.Охарактеризовано головні компоненти згаданої системи і з'ясовано місце, яке посі-дають у ній об'єднання комун. Встановлено, що французька держава, незважаючи на те, що є безумовним лідером серед інших європейських країн за кількістю дрібних та мало-заселених комун, замість примусового укрупнення територіальних громад надає перевагу добровільному їх об'єднанню.Проаналізовано також вплив процесу децентралізації та основних етапів муніципаль-ної й адміністративної реформ на розвиток об'єднання територіальних спільнот. Розглянуто нормативно-правову базу реформування, яка свого часу зумовила структуру французької системи місцевого самоврядування.Особливу увагу звернуто на законодавче закріплення механізмів об'єднання комун. З'ясовано, що об'єднання відбувається не лише у напрямі злиття кількох територіальних громад в одну, але насамперед на засадах розвитку міжкомунального співробітництва.Зважаючи на вищеперелічені чинники, зроблено висновок, що французька держава всіляко сприяє розвиткові добровільного об'єднання комун, особливо підтримує такі об'єднання, які створюються на основі міжкомунального співробітництва. Це свідчить про те, що такі структури є ефективними, і можуть бути дієвим засобом для підвищення рівня розвитку територій.З огляду на отримані результати позитивний досвід Французької республіки може бути застосовано для реформування місцевого самоврядування та територіальної орга-нізації влади в Україні та використано для подальших досліджень за цим напрямом.

A set of different organizational forms and institutions of local democ­racy through performed functions and powers of local governments, creates a system of local government. The term «system of local government» to take ap­propriate only to refer to organizational and legal framework of local govern­ment within the separate self-governing territorial-administrative units — vil­lages, towns, cities - Communities which are the subjects of separate local gov­ernments. Organization and functioning of local government regulated by legal norms that collectively constitute orga­nizational (organizational and legal) basis for local government. System of local government include: territorial community, village, town­ship, city council, village, mayor, execu­tive bodies of village, settlement, for the city, district and regional for represent­ing the common interests of territorial communities of villages, towns, cities, bodies of self - population. ; Совокупность различных органи­зационных форм и институтов мест­ной демократии, через которые осу­ществляются функции и полномочия местного самоуправления, образует систему местного самоуправления. Термин «система местного самоуп­равления» целесообразно употреблять лишь для обозначения организацион­но-правового механизма осуществле­ния местного самоуправления в пре­делах отдельной самоуправляющейся административно-территориальной единицы — села, поселка, города, территориальные громады которых выступают самостоятельными субъ­ектами местного самоуправления. Организация и функционирование системы местного самоуправления регламентируются правовыми нор­мами, которые в совокупности со­ставляют организационную (органи­зационно-правовую) основу местного самоуправления. Система местного самоуправления включает: территориальную грома­ду; сельский, поселковый, городской совет; сельского, поселкового, город­ского голову; исполнительные органы сельского, поселкового, городского со­вета; районные и областные советы, которые представляют общие инте­ресы территориальных громад сел, поселков, городов; органы самоорга­низации населения. ; Сукупність різних організацій­них форм та інститутів місцевої демократії, через які здійснюють­ся функції та повноваження міс­цевого самоврядування, утворює систему місцевого самоврядуван­ня. Термін «система місцевого само­врядування» доцільно вживати лише для позначення організаційно-право­вого механізму здійснення місцево­го самоврядування в межах окремої самоврядної адміністративно-тери­торіальної одиниці — села, селища, міста, територіальні громади яких виступаютьсамостійнимисуб'єктами місцевого самоврядування. Організація та функціонування системи місцевого самоврядування регламентуються правовими норма­ми, які в сукупності становлять ор­ганізаційну (організаційно-правову) основу місцевого самоврядування. Система місцевого самоврядуван­ня включає: територіальну громаду; сільську, селищну, міську раду; сіль­ського, селищного, міського голову; виконавчі органи сільської, селищ­ної, міської ради; районні та облас­ні ради, що представляють спільні інтереси територіальних громад сіл, селищ, міст; органи самоорганізації населення.

The article deals with the main problems of formation and effective functioning of the system of local self-government. Features of activity of system of this level of the power in modern Russian practice are noted. ; В статье рассмотрены основные проблемы формирования и эффективного функционирования системы местного самоуправления. Отмечены особенности деятельности системы данного уровня власти в современной российской практике.

Problem setting. Conflict prevention has proven effective in eliminating the various causes of conflict, especially in view of the digitalization of society. On the one hand, these areas are not directly related to conflict situations, but, on the other hand, the implementation practice shows that the mechanisms of their implementation can significantly increase the level of conflict resolution and management. Conflict in the system of local self-government more often arises as a reaction to the lack of efficiency of information support of the subjects of the system of local self-government, which is subsequently perceived by citizens as an omission of the nature and causes of conflict. Such cases cause the spread of unreliable information among the inhabitants of a certain territorial community, which can be disseminated through the media, local media, web portals, etc. This necessitates the improvement of the domestic legal framework for conflict management mechanisms in the context of digitalization of society. Recent research and publications analysis. The considered problems are at the initial stage of research. Thus, according to S.V. Sokolov, if the conflict is not noticed, ignored, engaged in its ideological (verbal) solution and do almost nothing, it will unfold spontaneously, exacerbate, merge with other conflicts and ultimately end in the destruction of the social system (or subject) in which it occurs. In the scientific development of S.O. Teleshun, I.V. Reiterovich, S.V. Sytnyk revealed the essence and content of the conflict as one of the processes of public policy, which can be both constructive and destructive, identified the main mechanisms of conflict, classified them, analyzed the features of the relationship between public policy institutions and civil society. Lebedeva and O. Matviykiv conducted research and analysis of design conflicts that arise during collective (group) design due to various technical and social factors. The authors propose an architecture of organizational and technical support of the collective design process, within which social and technical conflicts are detected and eliminated, and a model of conflict management is developed and proposed. However, the research of the above-mentioned scientists cannot be directly applied to the analysis of conflict management mechanisms in the context of the development of digitalization of society. The paper objective – to outline the main elements and tasks of conflict management mechanisms in the system of local self-government in the context of digitalization of society, including by developing proposals for improving the current legislation of Ukraine. The paper main body. The conditionality of the interaction of conflict management in the system of local self-government, given the active digitalization of society, outlines its uncertainty, as it cannot be clearly predicted. Challenges to the implementation of local self-government through digitalization and adaptation of events that occur in everyday life may be applied in the future. The subjects of the conflict in the system of local self-government tend to project the basic patterns of events or the whole event. Planning is closely related to this process in conflict management. Attention should be paid to the environmental conflicts that occur against the background of a number of social problems that have been accumulating in the cities of Ukraine for a long time. These include the poor environmental situation in general, traffic congestion in cities, lack of sufficient number of parks and more. In general, these problems are objective, as in cities, it is difficult to find the optimal combination of economic and social components of development. However, finding solutions to these problems would be much easier if local authorities had a more active dialogue with citizens. Refusal of it leads to the actualization of the political component of the conflict. It mainly affected the personnel component of local self-government, but it is necessary to pay attention to the nature of the interaction between government and society. The legislator provided for the possibility of local council deputies to express and protect the interests of the respective territorial community and its part - voters of their constituency, to carry out their instructions within their powers, by videoconference or audioconference, which in most cases resolve the conflict. In turn, conflict management in the system of local self-government is provided in the prevention of conflicts of interest, which is achieved by entrusting the deputies of local councils to provide information about their activities, which can lead to conflicts of interest. Conclusions of the research. As a result of the study, the main elements and tasks of conflict management mechanisms in the system of local self-government in the context of digitalization of society were outlined, proposals were made to improve the current legislation of Ukraine. It is established that, taking into account remote measures in the system of local self-government, the current legislation of Ukraine does not provide for the protection of information and security transmitted by videoconference or audioconference, which are promising areas of further research and development of regulations in the development of digitalization. ; У статті розкрито теоретико-методологічні підходи до визначення механізмів управління конфліктами в системі місцевого самоврядування в умовах цифровізації суспільства. Розглянуто питання дотримання органами місцевого самоврядування чинного законодавства у сфері управління та розв'язання конфлікту, діяльність депутатів місцевих рад, пов'язану з розробкою механізмів управління конфліктами в умовах цифровізації суспільства з метою вираження і захисту інтересів відповідної територіальної громади та забезпечення активної участі у здійсненні місцевого самоврядування.Ключові слова: управління конфліктами; місцеве самоврядування; система місцевого самоврядування; цифровізація; публічне управління; конфлікт; механізми управління конфліктами.

Problem setting. Conflict prevention has proven effective in eliminating the various causes of conflict, especially in view of the digitalization of society. On the one hand, these areas are not directly related to conflict situations, but, on the other hand, the implementation practice shows that the mechanisms of their implementation can significantly increase the level of conflict resolution and management. Conflict in the system of local self-government more often arises as a reaction to the lack of efficiency of information support of the subjects of the system of local self-government, which is subsequently perceived by citizens as an omission of the nature and causes of conflict. Such cases cause the spread of unreliable information among the inhabitants of a certain territorial community, which can be disseminated through the media, local media, web portals, etc. This necessitates the improvement of the domestic legal framework for conflict management mechanisms in the context of digitalization of society. Recent research and publications analysis. The considered problems are at the initial stage of research. Thus, according to S.V. Sokolov, if the conflict is not noticed, ignored, engaged in its ideological (verbal) solution and do almost nothing, it will unfold spontaneously, exacerbate, merge with other conflicts and ultimately end in the destruction of the social system (or subject) in which it occurs. In the scientific development of S.O. Teleshun, I.V. Reiterovich, S.V. Sytnyk revealed the essence and content of the conflict as one of the processes of public policy, which can be both constructive and destructive, identified the main mechanisms of conflict, classified them, analyzed the features of the relationship between public policy institutions and civil society. Lebedeva and O. Matviykiv conducted research and analysis of design conflicts that arise during collective (group) design due to various technical and social factors. The authors propose an architecture of organizational and technical support of the collective design process, within which social and technical conflicts are detected and eliminated, and a model of conflict management is developed and proposed. However, the research of the above-mentioned scientists cannot be directly applied to the analysis of conflict management mechanisms in the context of the development of digitalization of society. The paper objective – to outline the main elements and tasks of conflict management mechanisms in the system of local self-government in the context of digitalization of society, including by developing proposals for improving the current legislation of Ukraine. The paper main body. The conditionality of the interaction of conflict management in the system of local self-government, given the active digitalization of society, outlines its uncertainty, as it cannot be clearly predicted. Challenges to the implementation of local self-government through digitalization and adaptation of events that occur in everyday life may be applied in the future. The subjects of the conflict in the system of local self-government tend to project the basic patterns of events or the whole event. Planning is closely related to this process in conflict management. Attention should be paid to the environmental conflicts that occur against the background of a number of social problems that have been accumulating in the cities of Ukraine for a long time. These include the poor environmental situation in general, traffic congestion in cities, lack of sufficient number of parks and more. In general, these problems are objective, as in cities, it is difficult to find the optimal combination of economic and social components of development. However, finding solutions to these problems would be much easier if local authorities had a more active dialogue with citizens. Refusal of it leads to the actualization of the political component of the conflict. It mainly affected the personnel component of local self-government, but it is necessary to pay attention to the nature of the interaction between government and society. The legislator provided for the possibility of local council deputies to express and protect the interests of the respective territorial community and its part - voters of their constituency, to carry out their instructions within their powers, by videoconference or audioconference, which in most cases resolve the conflict. In turn, conflict management in the system of local self-government is provided in the prevention of conflicts of interest, which is achieved by entrusting the deputies of local councils to provide information about their activities, which can lead to conflicts of interest. Conclusions of the research. As a result of the study, the main elements and tasks of conflict management mechanisms in the system of local self-government in the context of digitalization of society were outlined, proposals were made to improve the current legislation of Ukraine. It is established that, taking into account remote measures in the system of local self-government, the current legislation of Ukraine does not provide for the protection of information and security transmitted by videoconference or audioconference, which are promising areas of further research and development of regulations in the development of digitalization. ; У статті розкрито теоретико-методологічні підходи до визначення механізмів управління конфліктами в системі місцевого самоврядування в умовах цифровізації суспільства. Розглянуто питання дотримання органами місцевого самоврядування чинного законодавства у сфері управління та розв'язання конфлікту, діяльність депутатів місцевих рад, пов'язану з розробкою механізмів управління конфліктами в умовах цифровізації суспільства з метою вираження і захисту інтересів відповідної територіальної громади та забезпечення активної участі у здійсненні місцевого самоврядування.Ключові слова: управління конфліктами; місцеве самоврядування; система місцевого самоврядування; цифровізація; публічне управління; конфлікт; механізми управління конфліктами.

In this article a presently existing public administration system in Lithuania as well as the position of municipalities(subjects of local self–government) in that system are described, the features of the "real" local self–governmentare being formulated, potentially possible groups of problems of local self–government are distinguished and currentlymain problems of municipalities of Lithuania are indicated.The author of the article notes that in Lithuania up till now the concept of the "real" local self–government hasnot been clearly and unambiguously defined yet. That makes the formulation of target goals, tasks and means as wellas their implementation developing the system of local self–government more difficult. Seeking at least partly to fillthe existing gap, the author of the article formulates eight features of the "real" local self–government.Having defined the problem of local self–government as a deviation from the "normal" conditions for thefunctioning of the local self–government system that cause negative changes in the system, the author of the articleshows the relationship between the "normal" conditions for the functioning of local self–government and the formulatedfeatures of the "real" local self–government. According to this relationship the author of the article indicateseight potentially possible groups of problems of local self–government.On the basis of the accumulated knowledge and acquired experience the author of the article points out fivegroups of currently particularly important problems for local self–government of Lithuania, which are conditionallynamed as follows: 1) suppressed independence; 2) insufficient constructiveness of the relationship among differentlevels of government; 3) economic problems of municipalities; 4) not involving community members in managinglocal affairs; 5) inertness of municipalities.

The article analyzes the political crowdsourcing as a factor of development of municipalities and political culture of participation of the Russian Federation in the framework of the information society. The authors propose to look at the system of local self-government from the point of view of social interests of the local communities. Political crowdsourcing becomes relevant in the system of local government. The basis of the study is a systematic approach that allows viewit modern types and principles of organization of political crowdsourcing at the local level. The primary implementers of political crowdsourcing is the youth as the most active and creative social group. Is offered on the basis of youth organization under the representative body of local samoraneniya the creation of the analytical center for the implementation of political crowdsourcing projects. A variant allows you to develop and maintain a democratic regime in Russia to increase the percentage of civil and political activity, to increase the speed and quality of communication between government and civil society, is most effective to include young people in the political sphere in an attractive form, to establish a school for professional growth of young scientists and politicians.Purpose: identify current types and principles of organization for political crowdsourcing at the local level and developing options for its promotion.Methodology: the authors use a systematic approach, the analysis of modern scientific literature and Internet web sites for political crowdsourcing.Results: defined the modern types and principles of organization of political crowdsourcing at the local level and developed a variant of the analytical center on the basis of youth organization under the representative body of local self-government.Practical implications: the obtained results should apply to political actors at the Federal, regional and municipal levels. ; В статье анализируется политический краудсорсинг как фактор развития муниципальных образований и политической культуры участия в РФ в рамках развития информационного общества. Автор предлагает взглянуть на систему местного самоуправления с точки зрения социальных интересов местных сообществ. Политический краудсорсинг становится актуальным в системе местного самоуправления. Основой исследования выбран системный подход, позволяющий выявить современные виды и принципы организации политического краудсорсинга на местном уровне. Основным актором политического краудсорсинга является молодежь как наиболее активная и креативная социальная группа. Предлагается на базе молодежной организации при представительном органе местного самоуправления создание аналитического центра для реализации политических краудсорсинговых проектов. Разработанный вариант позволяет развивать и поддерживать демократический режим в России, увеличить процент гражданской и политической активности, увеличить скорость и качество коммуникации между государством и гражданским обществом, наиболее эффективно включить молодежь в политическую сферу в притягательной форме, создать школу профессионального роста молодых политологов и политиков.Цель: определение современных видов и принципов организации политического краудсорсинга на местном уровне и разработка варианта её продвижения.Метод или методология проведения работы: в статье использовались системный подход, анализ современной научной литературы и интернет сайтов по политическому краудсорсингу.Результаты: определены современные виды и принципы организации политического краудсорсинга на местном уровне и разработан вариант создания аналитического центра на базе молодежной организации при представительном органе местного самоуправления.Область применения результатов: полученные результаты целесообразно применять политическим субъектами на федеральном, региональном и муниципальном уровнях.

The notion of «principles» under which it should be understood general provisions logically related to the rule of law , while not necessarily defined and enshrined in legislation in general terms that combine private and concretize the rules governing the specific relationship; considered constitutional principles of local self-government, causing the institution of local government and find expression in the functioning of its organs , which are common to both the organization and activities of state authorities and local self-government (the principle of democracy, democracy, humanity, unity of rights and obligations, legality, publicity, etc.); defined aspects of the interaction and correlation of the constitutional principles of local government and the local government system ; argued for the conclusion that the constitutional principles of local self-government formed a legal model of the whole society, the state , their relationship with each other , the individual and their associations (regional communities), hence they should be considered and presented in the formation of local self-government. ; В статье рассмотрены конституционные принципы местного самоуправления, которые обуславливают существование института местного самоуправления и находят свое выражение в функционировании его органов и являются общими как для организации и деятельности органов государственной власти, так и органов местного самоуправления; их соотношение и взаимосвязь с системой местного самоуправления. ; У статті розглянуто конституційні принципи місцевого самоврядування, які обумовлюють існування інституту місцевого самоврядування і знаходять своє вираження в функціонуванні його органів і є загальними як для організації та діяльності органів державної влади, так і органів місцевого самоврядування; їх співвідношення та взаємозв'язок з системою місцевого самоврядування.