Search results

The paper offers a contribution to the interdisciplinary constructs of analyzing fairness issues in automatic algorithmic decisions. Section 1 shows that technical choices in supervised learning have social implications that need to be considered. Section 2 proposes a contextual approach to the issue of unintended group discrimination, i.e. decision rules that are facially neutral but generate disproportionate impacts across social groups (e.g., gender, race or ethnicity). The contextualization will focus on the legal systems of the United States on the one hand and Europe on the other. In particular, legislation and case law tend to promote different standards of fairness on both sides of the Atlantic. Section 3 is devoted to the explainability of algorithmic decisions; it will confront and attempt to cross-reference legal concepts (in European and French law) with technical concepts and will highlight the plurality, even polysemy, of European and French legal texts relating to the explicability of algorithmic decisions. The conclusion proposes directions for further research ; Version 1.0-6 mai 2022 RESUME L'article propose une contribution aux constructions interdisciplinaires de l'analyse des enjeux d'équité dans les décisions algorithmiques automatiques. La section 1 montre que les choix techniques en apprentissage supervisé ont des implications sociales dont il faut prendre la mesure. La section 2 propose une approche contextuelle de la question de la discrimination de groupe non intentionnelle, c'est-à-dire de règles de décision facialement neutres mais qui génèrent des impacts disproportionnés selon les groupes sociaux (selon les cas : genrés, raciaux ou ethniques). La contextualisation portera sur les systèmes juridiques des États-Unis d'un côté, de l'Europe d'un autre côté. En particulier, la législation et la jurisprudence tendent à promouvoir des critères d'équité différents de part et d'autre de l'Atlantique. La section 3 est consacrée à l'explicabilité des décisions algorithmiques ; elle ...

The paper offers a contribution to the interdisciplinary constructs of analyzing fairness issues in automatic algorithmic decisions. Section 1 shows that technical choices in supervised learning have social implications that need to be considered. Section 2 proposes a contextual approach to the issue of unintended group discrimination, i.e. decision rules that are facially neutral but generate disproportionate impacts across social groups (e.g., gender, race or ethnicity). The contextualization will focus on the legal systems of the United States on the one hand and Europe on the other. In particular, legislation and case law tend to promote different standards of fairness on both sides of the Atlantic. Section 3 is devoted to the explainability of algorithmic decisions; it will confront and attempt to cross-reference legal concepts (in European and French law) with technical concepts and will highlight the plurality, even polysemy, of European and French legal texts relating to the explicability of algorithmic decisions. The conclusion proposes directions for further research ; Version 1.0-6 mai 2022 RESUME L'article propose une contribution aux constructions interdisciplinaires de l'analyse des enjeux d'équité dans les décisions algorithmiques automatiques. La section 1 montre que les choix techniques en apprentissage supervisé ont des implications sociales dont il faut prendre la mesure. La section 2 propose une approche contextuelle de la question de la discrimination de groupe non intentionnelle, c'est-à-dire de règles de décision facialement neutres mais qui génèrent des impacts disproportionnés selon les groupes sociaux (selon les cas : genrés, raciaux ou ethniques). La contextualisation portera sur les systèmes juridiques des États-Unis d'un côté, de l'Europe d'un autre côté. En particulier, la législation et la jurisprudence tendent à promouvoir des critères d'équité différents de part et d'autre de l'Atlantique. La section 3 est consacrée à l'explicabilité des décisions algorithmiques ; elle ...

Order of the State President on the promulgation of Law. - S. 57-58 Law on science and technology. - S. 59-104

Lawyers traditionally oppose openings towards other social sciences. The challenge is simple: preserve the autonomy of the law, which relates both to the subject studied and to the way in which it is studied and to those who study it. In the 21st s, however, while interdisciplinarity, multidisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity are encouraged throughout universities, the isolation of knowledge and the work of legal faculties may appear to be less and less justified. In this study, consideration should be given to the possibility and appropriateness of receiving in law lessons and methods specific, in particular, to economics, sociology or anthropology. ; International audience Lawyers are traditionally opposed to openings towards other social sciences. The challenge is simple: to preserve the autonomy of law, which relates to the subject matter as well as how to study it and those who study it. However, today, while everywhere interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary are encouraged, the isolation of the law may appear less and less justified. This study will propose some reflections concerning the practical and epistemological legitimacy and relevance of the interdisciplinarity. ; Lawyers traditionally oppose openings towards other social sciences. The challenge is simple: preserve the autonomy of the law, which relates both to the subject studied and to the way in which it is studied and to those who study it. In the 21st s, however, while interdisciplinarity, multidisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity are encouraged throughout universities, the isolation of knowledge and the work of legal faculties may appear to be less and less justified. In this study, consideration should be given to the possibility and appropriateness of receiving in law lessons and methods specific, in particular, to economics, sociology or anthropology. ; Les juristes s'opposent traditionnellement aux ouvertures en direction des autres sciences sociales. L'enjeu est simple : préserver l'autonomie du droit, laquelle se ...

Mode of access: Internet. ; French, English, German, Italian. ; "Servant d'organe à l'International law association."

The issue of legal humanism has often been addressed in the form of methodological advances successively brought about by philological discoveries. As a result, lawyers converted to the benefits of the familiar approach to texts have changed both their exegetic technique and the way in which they teach. On the basis of the various questions raised by the return, the article seeks to clarify the political significance of the location of the person who was much more than a philological conquest. The aim was to adjust the law to the new challenges of political culture, including the slow emergence of sovereignty in Bodin. ; International audience ; The issue of legal humanism has often been addressed in the form of methodological advances successively brought about by philological discoveries. As a result, lawyers converted to the benefits of the familiar approach to texts have changed both their exegetic technique and the way in which they teach. On the basis of the various questions raised by the return, the article seeks to clarify the political significance of the location of the person who was much more than a philological conquest. The aim was to adjust the law to the new challenges of political culture, including the slow emergence of sovereignty in Bodin. ; La question de l'humanisme juridique a souvent été traitée sous la forme des avancées méthodologiques apportées successivement par les découvertes philologiques. Les juristes convertis aux bienfaits de l'approche savante des textes auraient ainsi modifié à la fois leur technique exégétique et leur façon d'enseigner (le ). En partant des différentes questions soulevées par le retour , l'article cherche à préciser la portée politique de l'implantation de la qui fut bien plus qu'une conquête philologique. Il s'agissait d'ajuster le droit aux nouveaux défis de la culture politique, notamment à la lente émergence de la souveraineté qui trouvera son accomplissement chez Bodin.