Suchergebnisse

"This volume analyses the transformation of social sectarianism into political sectarianism across the Arab world. Using a framework of social theories and socio-historical analysis, the book distinguishes between 'ta'ifa', or 'sect', and modern 'ta'ifiyya', 'sectarianism', arguing that sectarianism itself produces 'imaginary sects'. It charts and explains the evolution of these phenomena and their development in Arab and Islamic history, as distinct from other concepts used to study religious groups within Western contexts.Bishara documents the role played by internal and external factors and rivalries among political elites in the formulation of sectarian identity, citing both historical and contemporary models. He contends that sectarianism does not derive from sect, but rather that sectarianism resurrects the sect in the collective consciousness and reproduces it as an imagined community under modern political and historical conditions. 'Sectarianism Without Sects' is a vital resource for engaging with the sectarian crisis in the Arab world. It provides a detailed historical background to the emergence of sect in the region, as well as a complex theoretical exploration of how social identities have assumed political significance in the struggle for power over the state"--From dust jacket

Résumé Impossible d'évoquer le statut du religieux dans nos sociétés occidentales sans poser la question des sectes. Impossible de poser la question « Qu'est-ce qu'une secte ? » sans l'éclairer à la lumière du droit positif. Pour le médiologue comme pour le philosophe, le dossier juridique, s'il ne dit pas l'alpha et l'oméga, constitue un point de passage obligé, quelles que soient les réserves à faire par ailleurs. C'est dans cet esprit que nous publions l'instructive et originale intervention de M. Leschi, chef du Bureau des cultes au ministère de l'Intérieur, devant la commission d'enquête sur les dérives sectaires de l'Assemblée nationale.

Intro -- Half Title -- Title -- Copyright -- Contents -- Preface -- 1. On the Problematic of Sectarianism -- 2. Mapping Terms: Towards Analytical Conceptualisation -- 3. Confessionalisation as a Prelude to Sectarianisation -- 4. Is a Ta'ifa a Community? -- 5. Firqa and Iftiraq in Islam -- 6. Social Conflict, Sects, and Foreign Intervention: The Tanzimat and the Events of 1860 -- 7. Ibn Khaldun's 'Asabiyya and Sects -- 8. Sectarianism, its Historicity, and Some Ethical Implications -- 9. Nothing Eternal About It -- 10. Is Modern Sectarianism a Product of Secularisation? -- 11. Community to Imagined Community, Social Sectarianism to Political Sectarianism -- 12. Sectarianism from Popular Participation in the Public Sphere to a Barrier to Participation -- 13. Majorities, Minorities, and Tolerance -- Conclusion -- Index -- Back Cover.

First published in 2007. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.

This article analyses the phenomenon of sect in Hindu society through empirical data and a review of literature, and pleads for the recognition of the sect as a structural principle of society as a whole, rather than merely of religion. It considers the sect/non-sect distinction more basic than the caste/sect distinction, and the long-held presumption of a necessary relation between renunciation and sect as limiting a proper understanding of both religion and society. It analyses the social organisation of sects, taking an integrated view of laity and leadership, contrary to the overwhelming importance given to the latter in sociological literature. It examines the sect's relation with caste, including the Dalit castes, and with the Adivasi tribes, and seeks to place sect in the context of Sanskritic culture, including its intellectual life. Finally, it raises the issue of changes in sects in modern times, and the problem of their study.

The purpose of performance this paper is writing to know at a glance the flow of thought or sect of the Monetaris and flows along with Institutional characters and see the differences and similarities between the two schools of thought. From the study of literature between the institutional and the flow of the stream of monetaris there is a difference of consideration, has this been ascertained because the flow of its own institutional critiquing the thoughts of the classical and neoclassical free-market adherents and not willed the existence of government intervention, while institutional flow strongly believe the presence of the interference of Government in maintaining the stability and prosperity of the economy. The flow of monetaris own basically belongs on the flow of young neoclassical still very wedded to the free market economy, even though here monetaris does not close the existence of government intervention, but the share of the Government's role is very limited or have small portions, which are only on the scope of the setting of the money supply. They share associated with monopoly, where the two streams do not requires the existence of a monopoly in the economy. ; Tujuan dilaksanakannya penulisan makalah ini adalah untuk mengetahui sekilas pemikiran aliran atau mazhab Institusional dan aliran Monetaris beserta tokoh-tokohnya dan melihat perbedaan serta persamaan pemikiran antara kedua mazhab tersebu. Dari kajian literatur antara aliran institusional dan aliran monetaris terdapat perbedaan dari pemikiran-pemikirannya, ini sudah dipastikan karena aliran institusional sendiri mengkritisi pemikiran-pemikiran dari mazhab klasik dan neoklasik yang penganut pasar bebas dan tidak menghendaki adanya campur tangan pemerintah, sedangkan aliran institusional sangat percaya adanya campur tangan pemerinta dalam menjaga kestabilan dan kesejahteraan perekonomian. Aliran monetaris sendiri pada dasarnya tergolong pada aliran neoklasik muda yang masih sangat menganut perekonomian pasar bebas, meskipun disini ...