Suchergebnisse

В настоящей работе раскрыты сущность и признаки необходимой обороны, условия правомерности её применения. Приведены различные точки зрения о полезности или вредности необходимой обороны. Необходимая оборона, её виды были рассмотрены с точки зрения закона, а также приведены научные мнения на этот счёт. Особое внимание в статье обращено на пределы необходимой обороны, рассмотрена возможность их превышения. В этой связи обращено внимание на важность тщательного рассмотрения всех обстоятельств конкретного дела, где можно применить законодательство о необходимой обороне. Выявлены трудности применения норм о необходимой обороне, в частности установления её пределов у практических работников, а также предложено решение данной проблемы. ; In the article reveals the essence and signs of necessary defense, the conditions for the legality of its application. Various points of view on the usefulness or harmfulness of necessary defense are presented. The necessary defense, its types were considered from the point of view of the law, and scientific opinions on this matter were given. Particular attention in the article is paid to the limits of necessary defense, the possibility of exceeding them is considered. In this regard, attention is drawn to the importance of careful consideration of all the circumstances of a particular case, where the legislation on necessary defense can be applied. The difficulties of applying the norms on necessary defense, in particular, the establishment of its limits for practitioners, are revealed, and a solution to this problem is proposed.

Раздел "Международное право" - рубрика "Вопросы теории" ; Статья посвящена рассмотрению вопроса правомерности упреждающего и превентивного применения вооруженной силы. На основе различных аспектов проводится анализ, позволивший раскрыть содержание терминов, выявить основные проблемы в понимании превентивной и упреждающей самообороны и предложить практические рекомендации. Лингвистический аспект. В сложившейся международной практике вышеназванные термины имеют разное значение: упреждение трактуется как ликвидация непосредственной или близкой угрозы, а превенция рассматривается как ликвидация угрозы, не являющейся непосредственной или близкой, т. е. угрозы, которая только формируется. Историко-правовой аспект. До принятия Устава ООН существовало право государств на войну. Однако в XX в. стали формироваться нормы международного права, ограничившие, а потом и запретившие войну. Завершился процесс отказа от войн принятием Устава ООН, запретившего прибегать к применению или угрозе силой. Доктринальный аспект. Выделяют три основных подхода относительно оснований и толкования самообороны: 1) «узкое» толкование самообороны. Основанием для самообороны является исключительно вооруженное нападение; 2) расширенное толкование права на самооборону. Основанием для самообороны признается также неминуемая угроза вооруженного нападения; 3) концепция превентивной самообороны: основанием для самообороны также являются отдаленные, только формирующиеся угрозы. Юридический аспект. На основании анализа Устава ООН и других документов делается вывод о возможности применения силы государством в качестве самообороны только в ответ на вооруженное нападение, в то время как упреждающие и превентивные меры являются исключительной компетенцией Совета Безопасности ООН. Военно-политический аспект. Проводится анализ Стратегий национальной безопасности США 2002 и 2006 гг. Таким образом, одним из путей решения разногласий по поводу толкования оснований для самообороны является восполнение существующих пробелов и исправление неточностей формулировок. = The present article considers the legality of pre-emptive and preventive use of armed force. On the basis of various aspects an analysis is carried out, which enabled to reveal the contents of terms to identify the main problems in the understanding of preventive and pre-emptive self-defense and to make practical recommendations. Linguistic aspect. In the prevailing international practice, the above-mentioned terms meanings are different: pre-emption is interpreted as the elimination of direct or close threat and prevention is seems as the elimination of the threat, which has just formed. Historical aspect. Prior to the adoption of the UN Charter all states had the right to war. However, the XX century began to form norms of international law, at first, to limit the right of war, but then to prohibit war. The process of renunciation of war was completed by the UN Charter adoption, which prohibits the use or threat of force. Doctrinal point. There are three main approaches to the grounds and the interpretation of self-defense: 1) the narrow interpretation of self-defense. The basis for self-defense is an armed attack; 2) the expanded interpretation of the right to self-defense. The basis for self-defense is recognized to be an imminent threat of armed attack; 3) the basis for self-defense is also a remote threat — the concept of preventive self-defense. Legal aspect. On the basis of analysis of the UN Charter and other documents, the conclusion was made on the possibility of the use of force by a State only in response to an armed attack, while the pre-emptive and preventive measures are within the exclusive competence of the UN Security Council. Military-political aspects. This part analyses «The National Security Strategy of the United States» for 2002 and 2006. Thus, one of the ways of resolving problems in interpretation of the grounds for self-defense is to fill gaps and to correct inaccuracies of formulations.

The article deals with the issue of the concept of restorability as one of the most important technical and operational properties of military vehicles, and on the basis of developing a system image of the process of reconstruction of the properties of military vehicles object and repair, a typical structure of requirements is defined which should be taken into account in the development of tactical and technical the task of creating the latest weapons and military equipment.

This article deals with the issues of regulation of property relations of spouses in private international law. The article deals with the conflict issues of marriage, as well as the contractual regime of a property of spouses. The article reveals the content of the Minsk and Chisinau conventions on property relations between spouses. In particular, the conventions say that the property relations between spouses are determined by the legislation of the Contracting Party in whose territory they live together. If the husband lives in one Contracting State and the wife in the other and both have the same nationality, the law of the country of which they are nationals governs their property relations. Attention is paid to bilateral agreements on legal assistance to States in the field of property relations between spouses. For example, such an agreement exists between Russia and Estonia, and it helps to resolve various property issues between spouses. The domestic legislation of different States regulates the issue of determining the regime of matrimonial property in different ways. For example, in the States of the Anglo-Saxon legal system and in most Muslim countries there is only a regime of separate property. On the contrary, in the States of the Romano-German legal system, preference is given to the regime of the common property of spouses, and it is possible to establish a different regime of property relations by agreement of the spouses. According to this principle, and developing family law in Russia.

Europeans still lack a common vision for how to ensure the continent's security. Regardless of who becomes the next U.S. president, a stronger European pillar in NATO is essential.

The relevance of the topic of a scientific article is related to the frequent cases in practice when there is a dispute over the application of the law of a particular state. With the help of the analysis of family law and private international law, a circle of subjects of legal relations is established that is connected with maintenance obligations complicated by a foreign element. In modern times there are many problems, in particular, the consequences of the dissolution of a marriage between spouses (one of whom is a foreign citizen) in the presence of minor children are poorly regulated internationally. The main problem in resolving issues related to alimony relations is the definition of applicable law. That is the law of which country (the right of citizenship of the husband's state or the right of citizenship of the wife's state) will be applied to resolve the dispute. In this paper, we will consider existing problems and offer our own vision of ways to solve such problems.

Russian scientists attach great importance to one of the fundamental principles of private international law – the principle of the closest connection. The concept of the closest connection was developed in England on the basis of case law, the rules of which were created by judges in court decisions on specific cases. The legislator has included the principle of closest connection to the civil code, however, in light of the changes it made in the reforms of 2013, the closest connection principle was assigned a secondary role in relation to the principle of characteristic performance. The main purpose of the principle of the closest connection is to find the law and order that can most effectively regulate cross-border relations. The court will have to determine the will of the parties to the contractual relationship, aimed at choosing the right. Therefore, a close relationship is established based on the court's assumption of what right the parties would have chosen if they had considered this issue. The principle of the closest connection, in connection with this approach, often loses its independent significance. Article 1187 of the civil code of the Russian Federation does not specify the conditions of its application, as well as the scope of its action. For this reason, the category of the closest relationship is universal and applies regardless of the nature of the cross-border civil relationship. Russian legislation does not have clear criteria for determining the closest relationship, which may lead to a subjective decision by the court. In this regard, the study of problems related to the application of the principle of the closest connection in judicial practice is undoubtedly relevant.

In the article there is given a general overview of the sources of the international sport law, which is a new dynamically developing branch of law. The author underlines that international sport law unites norms of international law and national legislation regulating sport relations of international nature.

The subject. The legal status of self-regulatory organizations based on the principle of mandatory membership was chosen as the subject of the research.The purpose of the article is to study the features of subjects of administrative law, vested with public powers, and substantiate the possibility of attribution of self-regulatory organizations with mandatory membership to legal entities of public law.The methodological basis for the study: general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, comparison, description) as well as formal-legal interpretation of legislation and judicial acts.Results, scope of application. Two types of subjects can take part in administrative relations, as a rule: subjects performing public functions and endowed with authority for their implementation, and subjects not endowed with appropriate powers and representing an exclusively private interest. At the same time, the first group of subjects includes not only public-territorial entities, state authorities, but also organizations performing publicly significant functions.The legal definition of a legal entity does not reflect all the features of the legal status of these subjects, that is why the author refers to the concept of a legal entity of public law. Legal entities of public law have a special nature, different from legal entities of private law, since they have the right to make decisions affecting an indefinite range of persons.Conclusions. The analysis of the features of the legal entity of public law allocated in the literature (special legal nature; special social quality; special interests and will; connection with the public power; special way of creation; public-legal character of responsibility) allowed to justify that self-regulatory organizations are the kind of legal entities of public law - organizations performing publicly significant functions. ; Рассмотрены особенности субъектов административного права, наделенных публичными полномочиями. Отмечается, что в указанную группу входят не только публично-территориальные образования, органы государственной власти, но и организации, осуществляющие публично значимые функции, все особенности правового статуса которых не отражаются легальным определением юридического лица. Автор обращается к концепции юридического лица публичного права, обладающего особой сущностью, отличной от юридических лиц частного права, поскольку вправе принимать решения, затрагивающие неопределенный круг лиц. Посредством анализа выделяемых в литературе признаков юридического лица публичного права (особая правовая природа; особое социальное качество; особые интересы и воля; связь с публичной властью; особый способ создания; публично-правовой характер ответственности) обосновывается отнесение саморегулируемых организаций к их числу.

Hinevich, E. S. Multilingualism in professional self-management / E. S. Hinevich, O. A. Volkova // European Science and Technology: materials of international research and practice conference, January 31st, 2012, Wiesbaden. Scientific edition. – Publishing office "BildungszentrumRodnik e. V.". - Wiesbaden, Germany, 2012. - P. 702-705. - Refer.: p. 705. ; Factors influencing on professionalism of managers are analyzed in the article. Basic stimulus, motivation of subjects of administrative labour are distinguished in the studying of foreign languages Results over of authorial sociological research and recommendation are brought in decision of social problems in a theory and practice of multilingual formation of specialists

Civil law States that the legal capacity of individuals is defined as the ability of the individual to have rights and obligations. This legal category arises from birth and ceases with death, it characterizes a person as a living being and does not depend on age and health. However, it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that it can be limited by a court decision, in particular in criminal proceedings it can be expressed in deprivation of the right to engage in certain activities, to occupy certain positions. The article reveals the content of legal capacity in private international law, the basic powers included in the legal capacity, in particular, the right to a name, its use and protection, analyzes the foreign legislation concerning the procedure of recognition as missing and the Declaration of a person as dead. The article deals with the conflict issues arising in the foreign and Russian legislation in the regulation of relations included in the content of legal capacity, the study of international legislation characterizing the legal status of the person.

Раздел "Международное право" ; Среди ученых нет однозначного мнения относительно места таможенного права в правовой системе. Под таможенным правом понимают институт административного права, подотрасль административного права, самостоятельную комплексную отрасль административного права либо комплексную отрасль законодательства. Исследование правовой природы показывает, что в современном таможенном праве можно выделить наднациональную (международную) и национальную части. Наднациональная часть включает нормы Таможенного кодекса таможенного союза и иных нормативных актов, которые принимаются международными договорами. Нормы национальной части принимаются законодательными актами страны. Таким образом, таможенное право — комплексная отрасль права, регулирующая общественные отношения в сфере перемещения товаров через таможенную границу Таможенного союза. = Scientists differ in their opinions regarding the place of customs law in the legal system. Customs law is understood as the institute of administrative law, a sub-branch of administrative law, a separate complex branch of administrative law or a complex branch of legislation. The research of its legal nature shows that it is possible to distinguish supranational (international) and national parts within the contemporary customs law. The supranational part includes the Customs Code norms of the Customs Union and other legal acts which are adopted by international treaties. The norms included into the national part are adopted by legislative acts of the country. Thereby, customs law is a complex branch of law regulating public relations in the sphere of movement of goods across the customs border of the Customs Union.

The timing has never been better. But without long-term funding, the strategy will fail.

In this article, the author analyzes the issues of bringing criminal norms in accordance with the international treaties of the Republic of Uzbekistan.