Suchergebnisse

What are the doctrinal implications of international responses to the demise of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY)? Faced with harshly conflicting internal visions of Yugoslav self-determination, the international order - taking direction from the Badinter Commission - reacted in an essentially ad hoc manner against the most manifestly virulent of the competing ethno-nationalisms. In ascribing international legal status to a particular set of constitutionally-established internal boundaries, the Badinter Commission gave a rationale that masked rather than highlighted its departure from existing doctrine, seeking thereby to minimize any implications for the future of sovereignty and s elf-determination. Any effort to invoke the Badinter Commission judgments as evidence of a broader doctrinal transformation, attributing international legal personality to constitutionally-delineated sub-national units more generally, neglects the peculiar context of those judgments and threatens to lend undue support to externally-promoted secessionist projects. Adapted from the source document.

Im Mittelpunkt der Untersuchung steht das Konzept der Neuen Internationalen Informationsordnung. Der Autor befaßt sich insbesondere mit dem Problem der ungleichen Entwicklung der Informationsmittel und der Kommunikationsmöglichkeiten in der Welt. Nach seiner Ansicht würde die internationale Informationsordnung eine Rechtsgrundlage für die Beseitigung von Ungleichheiten im Bereich der Kommunikationen schaffen und darüber hinaus zur Verwirklichung der Informationsfreiheit beitragen. (BIOst-Klk)

This article's point of departure is that the national self-determination doctrine remains one of the most paradoxical, contested, but successful doctrines which has largely contributed to the shape of our existing international system of nation-states. It argues that the doctrine which is intended to safeguard peace and human dignity is and always has been at the heart of many conflicts. Starting with the tension between the universality of the national self-determination doctrine and the particularity of the national group whose interests it promotes, the article explores other paradoxes contained within this doctrine. They range from political and legitimacy challenges to the very nation-state it creates, through the violations of human rights contrary to its very meaning, to the fact that national self-determination doctrine, far from being a national issue, is actually an international affair. While not rejecting the doctrine, the paper concludes with the final (ninth) paradox that perhaps the success of this doctrine should not be measured by how many states it can produce, but how it can make the existing states a safe home for more self-differentiating national groups. Adapted from the source document.

Yabu, T.: On relations between Greece and Japan. S. 5-22. Chronopoulos, G.: The Meiji reformation 1868-1890: foundation for a modern state. S: 23-42. Chronopoulosm G.: Christianity in Japan from 1500 to modern times. S. 43-52. Roussos, J.: Ancient Greek tragedy and Noh - a parallelism. S. 53-74. Kostakos, G.: Japan on the international political stage and its role in the framework of the United Nations. S. 75-90. Nikolaou, I.: Threat perceptions in the Asian Pacific region. S. 91-106. Vallianatos, S.: The post-war Japanese policy towards the Middle East. S. 107-134. (Text in griechisch). Spanides, P.: JETRO: A commitment to harmony and import expansion. S. 135-150. Klonos, G.: MITI and its role in the Japanese and world economy. S. 151-158. Yamazaki, T.: The action of the Japanese companies facing the EC internal market integration. S. 159-168. Koutsoubas, T.: Japan: a new market opens up. S. 169-180. Papatriantafyllou, D.: Japanese management. S. 181-190. (Text in griechisch)