Suchergebnisse

Este repertorio fue realizado y editado por el Instituto de Información y Documentación en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades (ISOC), que en 1992 junto con el ICYT formaría el CINDOC. Todos los registros bibliográficos que componen las diferentes ediciones de este repertorio están accesibles en la base de datos ISOC del CSIC http://bddoc.csic.es:8080/ http://bddoc.csic.es:8085/ Más información en: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/fichero_articulo?codigo=967409&orden=68880 ; [EN] Bibliographic index of Spanish academic journals specialized in Social Sciences. It has the next structure: Index of journals, summaries, index of authors and subject index with strings of keywords. Was published from 1979 to 1983, then it was divided in the next series: A Psychology and Education Science, B Economy, Sociology, Political Sciences and Urban Planning, C Legal Science, D Science and Scientific Documentation. ; [ES] Repertorio bibliográfico de publicaciones periódicas españolas de carácter científico de Ciencias Sociales. Contiene el análisis de contenido de los artículos de revistas seleccionadas. La estructura del repertorio es la siguiente: Índice de revistas indizadas, fotocomposición de los sumarios de las revistas, índice de autores, e índice de materias formado por cadenas de palabras clave. Se publicó de 1979 a 1983, desdoblándose a partir de esta fecha en series: Serie A Psicología y C. Educación, Serie B Economía, Sociología, C. Políticas y Urbanismo, Serie C Derecho, Serie D Ciencia y Documentación Científica. ; Peer reviewed

The impact of class values on theoretization in the social & natural sciences is examined. While the natural sciences depend for verification on experimental demonstration, social science analysis is based on abstraction. Consequently, class bias is much more likely in the social sciences because the inevitability of value judgment imparts a class perspective to all theorizing. However, unlike religion, bourgeois social science does not generate totally fantastic representation of reality; theories such as Keynesianism have a certain measure of practical validity. Proletarian social science (historical materialism) is not free of class bias either, but if its perspective is guided by the historical interests of the working class & it conforms to acceptable methodological criteria, it can generate objective knowledge of reality. S. Karganovic.

The present state of the social sciences in Latin America goes back to the foundation of the Organization of American States & to the Cold War begun during the Truman administration. From 1945 to 1959, a neopositivist & neoempiricist sociology, inspired by conservative North American sociologists, dominated the field. Nevertheless, starting with the Cuban revolution (1959), a sociology directly committed to popular movements & in favor of a renovation of Marxist & revolutionary thinking emerged & confronted the reformist approach to social sciences. In the 1970s, the critique took position mainly against the "developmentalist" thinking of the ECLA (acronym not defined), the traditional theory of dependency, denouncing as an illusion the notion of independence & development under the leadership of the national bourgeoisie. In Chile, Salvador Allende's government & its overthrow (1970-1973) demonstrated the relationship between power & politics, while the revolutionary struggles in Central America drew emphasis to the problems of SC & coalitions, SC struggle, & national & international negotiation. In the 1980s, the dominant preoccupations in the countries with a constitutional regime centered on tensions between democracy & crisis. Latin American social thinking & the social sciences investigations must confront the "Second Cold War," which has bases for legitimation not only in the US but also in Europe, & not only in neoliberal thinking, but in neo-Marxist thinking as well. Modified AA