Suchergebnisse

The article discusses the main characteristics of modern art journalism, which allow us to assert its anthropocentricity. It is proved that the subject of creativity, which creates artistic images, as well as the work itself as a reflection of the value picture of the artist's world, his worldview and ideological concept are the subject of reception and analysis of art journalism. The anthropocentricity of art journalism as a whole is obvious because art itself is anthropocentric. However, in modern conditions of globalization and the development of postmodern worldview, the anthropocentricity of art journalism is undergoing certain transformations. The specificity of art discourse lies, first of all, in a pronounced appraisal and authorial modality, and the very representation of a work of art in a media text is determined by the level of professionalism and the degree of talent of its producer, as well as the social recognition of the artist and the very status of the work of art, determined by the interest of the public in it, the artist's innovation, the demand for a particular genre in the art industry. In the text-discursive space of mass art journalism, one can find the most revealing cases of interaction between institutional, professional and everyday discourses, which, on the one hand, significantly characterizes modern art journalism from the standpoint of its anthropocentricity, and on the other hand, allows us to evaluate the dynamic transformations inherent in it in postmodern conditions. The postmodern worldview deprives the art discourse of any stable coordinates in terms of terminology or the presence of professional art criticism competencies in an art journalist. A positive assessment in the discourse of art journalism is aimed at reflecting success, the predominance of the best qualities in the interpreted object, which is further enhanced by the use of art criticism terminological apparatus, however, texts with ambiguous evaluation and authorial modality are also presented in the text-discursive space.

The article is dedicated to the modification of political field as result of social, economic, cultural and political changes, evoked by coronavirus pandemic and restrictive measurestaken to prevent contagion. The changes under consideration consist in the virtualizationof political communications, milieu for implementing policy and other systematic conditionsrelated to political field. These changes are of irreversible nature.

The article deals with the concept of psychological condition of society, which is quite new for psychology. This concept is developed in the framework of so-called macropsychological approach. Various indices are often used to assess the condition of society, for example, so-called Happy Planet Index. This index, like the others, is determined on the basis of analysis of official statistical information and mass surveys. However, while using it objective and subjective indicators often do not coincide. The article proves the evaluability of the psychological condition of society based on the concept of psychological polarization, developed by French social psychologist S. Moscovici. The model and the technique, allowing to estimate a psychological condition of society in units of psychological polarization, are offered. The article presents the results of a pilot empirical study (n = 199), according to which the conclusion on the possibility to use the model for the society psychological condition assessment has been made.