Suchergebnisse

The article aims to reveal the meaning of principle justice in studies of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. It was determined that Socrates, who considered justice to be the more expensive subject than gold and wished to prove the existence of general and the only notion of justice, associated it morality and knowledge. According to the philosopher injustice was unnatural, as it was a fruit of ignorance and error. Plato's justice is expressed in the devotion of all states (some are engaged in sciences and govern the country; the other faithfully follow the laws and bravely defend their homeland; others take care of the necessary supplies and obey the rulers) to one's business taking into consideration that everyone should be responsible for his duties and justice does not mean equality. There is no element of different social groups' equalization in Plato's sense of justice. While treating justice as general and private, Aristotle's concept recognizes inequality as the basis of the principle of justice. He believed that every person or thing had their own corresponding sphere of activity and influence and to confuse them seemed to be unfair, for some people due to their character and habits, have more opportunities than others. Therefore, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle while raising the problem of justice, associating it with such concepts as wisdom, beauty, harmony parallel to the problems of equality, inequality, state, law, politics, created the theoretical background for the development of further judgments about justice. These preconditions have found their expression in the subsequent history of the development of this concept, reflecting the uniqueness of the historical era, the school of philosophy and social class functions. ; У статті розкрито зміст принципу справедливості у вченнях Платона і Арістотеля. У Платона справедливість виражається у відданості всіх станів своїй справі, в тому, щоб кожен виконував свої обов'язки. Це говорить про те, що справедливість не може означати рівності. Арістотель поділяв справедливість на загальну і приватну, вважаючи, що кожна річ або людина мають свою власну, відповідну сферу діяльності і вплив, переступати які несправедливо, а деякі люди в силу свого характеру і схильностей, мають більш широкі можливості, ніж інші.

The article aims to reveal the meaning of principle justice in studies of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. It was determined that Socrates, who considered justice to be the more expensive subject than gold and wished to prove the existence of general and the only notion of justice, associated it morality and knowledge. According to the philosopher injustice was unnatural, as it was a fruit of ignorance and error. Plato's justice is expressed in the devotion of all states (some are engaged in sciences and govern the country; the other faithfully follow the laws and bravely defend their homeland; others take care of the necessary supplies and obey the rulers) to one's business taking into consideration that everyone should be responsible for his duties and justice does not mean equality. There is no element of different social groups' equalization in Plato's sense of justice. While treating justice as general and private, Aristotle's concept recognizes inequality as the basis of the principle of justice. He believed that every person or thing had their own corresponding sphere of activity and influence and to confuse them seemed to be unfair, for some people due to their character and habits, have more opportunities than others. Therefore, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle while raising the problem of justice, associating it with such concepts as wisdom, beauty, harmony parallel to the problems of equality, inequality, state, law, politics, created the theoretical background for the development of further judgments about justice. These preconditions have found their expression in the subsequent history of the development of this concept, reflecting the uniqueness of the historical era, the school of philosophy and social class functions. ; У статті розкрито зміст принципу справедливості у вченнях Платона і Арістотеля. У Платона справедливість виражається у відданості всіх станів своїй справі, в тому, щоб кожен виконував свої обов'язки. Це говорить про те, що справедливість не може означати рівності. Арістотель поділяв справедливість на загальну і приватну, вважаючи, що кожна річ або людина мають свою власну, відповідну сферу діяльності і вплив, переступати які несправедливо, а деякі люди в силу свого характеру і схильностей, мають більш широкі можливості, ніж інші.

The analysis of the gender temporality as some measurement of the social time is presented in the article with the accent on the transformation processes which nowadays determine the life of the Ukrainian society. The peculiarities of the philosophical interpretation of the social time phenomenon are under research concerning also the archaic meanings, which are present in the contemporary Ukrainian culture, and are supported by the patriarchal gender stereotypes. The latter is of great significance because those factors have a great impact on the processes of modelling the contemporary gender temporality in the context of conflictology of the Ukrainian society, which is stressed due to the masculine understanding of the "human" life, ideas and experience. Moreover, there are some actors in this problematic field, whose aim is to renovate anti-gender myths and mythologemes, thus creating the grounds for aggravating such kind of conflicts. It is maintained that quite on the contrary, – constructing the relations of gender parity is a true way to the social justice on the whole; and in this way, gender ideologies are factors of deconflictization of the Ukrainian social life. At present gender temporality is a marker of the extention of the egilitarian tendencies in the Ukrainian society. The examples given in the article, show that the gender measurements make determining the types of the conflict-making factors more valid and stipulated. The recent dramatic events in Ukraine connected with the hybrid war in the East of the country and women's role in that war actions, which is immensely supportive (volunteers etc.), show that the content of the femininity and the masculinity has changed de facto. The situation of the currents 2020 year with the pandemic Covid-19 consequences (economic, social, cultural, etc.) has stricken women greatly. All mentioned above makes it possible to prove that gender temporality as a component of the social time has a direct impact on the development and the consequent solution of the significant conflicts in the social life of Ukraine.

The article presents the peculiarities of using lustration as a particular procedure for bringing a judge to legal responsibility. It is established that the exceptions of lustration of a judge, as a specific procedure for getting him/her to a legal obligation in Ukraine, are regulated by the provisions of particular regulations and documents. Lustration is a set of legal and political measures aimed at neutralising the consequences and actions of the previous regime, which threaten fundamental human rights and the democratisation process in general. It is proved that the lustration procedure in Ukraine quickly gained popularity in the context of public distrust to the criminal and corrupt justice system in the period from November 2013 to February 2014, the main initiators of which were public organisations. It is determined that the process of organising the procedure of inspection of judges is directly entrusted to the chairman of the court, where the accused judge, who is under review, holds a position and performs official duties. It is established that lustration as a particular type of responsibility affects the restoration of social justice, as well as the implementation of the functions of protection of democracy. It was found that the prospect of further research in this area is to study other types of special procedures for bringing judges to justice, which in combination with the lustration procedure will affect the prevention of judges from committing offences. ; У статті представлено особливості застосування люстрації як спеціальної процедури притягнення судді до юридичної відповідальності. Встановлено, що особливості проведення люстрації судді, як спеціальної процедури притягнення судді до юридичної відповідальності в Україні, регулюються положеннями певних нормативно-правових актів і документів. З'ясовано, що люстрація являє собою комплекс юридичних та політичних заходів, які націлені на знешкодження наслідків та дій попереднього режиму, що становить загрозу основоположним правам людини і процесу демократизації в цілому. Доведено, що процедура проведення люстрації в Україні стрімко набула популярності в умовах недовіри суспільства до кримінальної та корумпованої системи правосуддя в період листопада 2013 року по лютий 2014 року, головними ініціаторами якої стали громадські організації. Визначено, що процес організування процедури проведення перевірки суддів безпосередньо покладений на голову суду, де обвинувачений суддя, щодо якого проводять перевірку, обіймає посаду та виконує службові обов'язки. Встановлено, що люстрація як спеціальний вид відповідальності впливає на відновлення соціальної справедливості, а також на реалізацію функцій захисту демократії. З'ясовано, що перспективою подальших досліджень у цьому напрямі є дослідження інших видів спеціальних процедур притягнення суддів до юридичної відповідальності, які у комплексі спільно із процедурою люстрації впливатимуть на перешкоджання суддям вчиняти правопорушення.

The paper explains the application domain of the modern political philosophy in analytic tradition, its sources and features. The author undertakes as analysis of some concrete conceptions and determines the main task of political philosophy as a search of the optimal principles of the theory of justice and securing the possibility of a co-existence of various conceptions of a social good. ; Стаття присвячена виявленню проблемного поля сучасної аналiтичної полiтичної фiлософiї, її витокiв i особливостей. На основi аналiзу конкретних концепцiй автор визначає головне завдання полiтичної фiлософiї: пошук оптимальних принципiв теорiй справедливостi та забезпечення можливостi спiвiснування рiзних концепцiй суспiльного блага.

The article examines the processes of formation and acquisition of legal nature by social rights based on the legislative experience of the countries of the European community. The evolution of the functions of the state in terms of acquiring the legal nature by social rights is analyzed.Problem setting. Ensuring and realization of the social human rights is a complex and multifaceted process. As of this date, the cooperation of state bodies, international and national organizations, scholars and practitioners is aimed at achieving a new quality level of legislative support and recognition of the category of social rights, developing new and effective mechanisms for their provision and implementation.Recent research and publications analysis. The social rights are of interest to the scholars and practitioners of various fields of knowledge and branches of science. This is because the social rights are a rather complex category and in their content, generally and properly, they refer to different fields of science, such as economic, political, legal, social, public administration.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. In the context of public administration, the social rights are the subject of research as the object of forming a state policy for regulating relations related to the protection and realization of the social rights. In addition, the analytical part of the article was elaborated on the basis of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the European Social Charter (revised), the European Code of Social Security (revised) and other documents.Paper main body. At the end of the XIX century in Europe, several draft laws appeared that contained not only "classic" – personal and political rights, but also "the second-generation" rights – socio-economic and cultural rights. These constitutions set out the responsibilities of governments in the fields of employment, education, public health etc.Only in the late XIX century, the social rights gained the legal recognition in several drafts of the European constitutions. The classical human rights include "second generation" rights – socio-economic and cultural rights. For the first time, this legal extension broadened the obligations of the government in the fields of employment, education, public health etc. The first constitution in the world, which established a broad and sufficiently detailed list of socio-economic rights, was the Constitution of Mexico, adopted on January 17, 1917.In connection with the state social security obligations, by the end of the XIX century, there was a policy of non-intervention by the state in organization of social protection systems, the creation of social insurance, which was encouraged by the state mutual assistance of these two institutions. The significant changes took place in the middle of XX century; the emergence of a welfare state entailed the recognition of social rights and the assignment of social function to the state. Thus, the state had a duty to be concerned with the social justice, the well-being of its citizens and guaranteeing their social protection. The introduction of European experience and practices will help create conditions for high-level European social rights standards in Ukraine, such as a decent standard of living and quality of life, adequate social security standards and high standards of general social development, social well-being of the population.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Analyzing the above-stated, it should be said that the level of ensuring the realization of social rights depends on the level of development of the country. Therefore, different mechanisms are acting in different countries for the implementation of state programs to ensure the social rights. However, the cooperation of international organizations focused specifically on the social sphere sets the common standards for the level of social rights that other countries should strive for. ; Досліджено процеси формування та набуття соціальними правами правового спрямування на основі законодавчого досвіду країн європейської спільноти. Проаналізовано еволюцію функцій держави в умовах набуття соціальними правами юридичного спрямування. Зауважено, що важливим аспектом у роботі цього напряму є аналіз міжнародних стандартів, стандартів Ради Європи та Європейського Союзу щодо реалізації та забезпечення соціальних прав людини.

The article examines the processes of formation and acquisition of legal nature by social rights based on the legislative experience of the countries of the European community. The evolution of the functions of the state in terms of acquiring the legal nature by social rights is analyzed.Problem setting. Ensuring and realization of the social human rights is a complex and multifaceted process. As of this date, the cooperation of state bodies, international and national organizations, scholars and practitioners is aimed at achieving a new quality level of legislative support and recognition of the category of social rights, developing new and effective mechanisms for their provision and implementation.Recent research and publications analysis. The social rights are of interest to the scholars and practitioners of various fields of knowledge and branches of science. This is because the social rights are a rather complex category and in their content, generally and properly, they refer to different fields of science, such as economic, political, legal, social, public administration.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. In the context of public administration, the social rights are the subject of research as the object of forming a state policy for regulating relations related to the protection and realization of the social rights. In addition, the analytical part of the article was elaborated on the basis of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the European Social Charter (revised), the European Code of Social Security (revised) and other documents.Paper main body. At the end of the XIX century in Europe, several draft laws appeared that contained not only "classic" – personal and political rights, but also "the second-generation" rights – socio-economic and cultural rights. These constitutions set out the responsibilities of governments in the fields of employment, education, public health etc.Only in the late XIX century, the social rights gained the legal recognition in several drafts of the European constitutions. The classical human rights include "second generation" rights – socio-economic and cultural rights. For the first time, this legal extension broadened the obligations of the government in the fields of employment, education, public health etc. The first constitution in the world, which established a broad and sufficiently detailed list of socio-economic rights, was the Constitution of Mexico, adopted on January 17, 1917.In connection with the state social security obligations, by the end of the XIX century, there was a policy of non-intervention by the state in organization of social protection systems, the creation of social insurance, which was encouraged by the state mutual assistance of these two institutions. The significant changes took place in the middle of XX century; the emergence of a welfare state entailed the recognition of social rights and the assignment of social function to the state. Thus, the state had a duty to be concerned with the social justice, the well-being of its citizens and guaranteeing their social protection. The introduction of European experience and practices will help create conditions for high-level European social rights standards in Ukraine, such as a decent standard of living and quality of life, adequate social security standards and high standards of general social development, social well-being of the population.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Analyzing the above-stated, it should be said that the level of ensuring the realization of social rights depends on the level of development of the country. Therefore, different mechanisms are acting in different countries for the implementation of state programs to ensure the social rights. However, the cooperation of international organizations focused specifically on the social sphere sets the common standards for the level of social rights that other countries should strive for. ; Досліджено процеси формування та набуття соціальними правами правового спрямування на основі законодавчого досвіду країн європейської спільноти. Проаналізовано еволюцію функцій держави в умовах набуття соціальними правами юридичного спрямування. Зауважено, що важливим аспектом у роботі цього напряму є аналіз міжнародних стандартів, стандартів Ради Європи та Європейського Союзу щодо реалізації та забезпечення соціальних прав людини.

A comprehensive hermeneutic analysis of the phenomenon of justice as a socio-cultural phenomenon that is interdisciplinary and historically structured.The idea of justice occupies centre stage both in ethics, and in legal and political philosophy. It apply to individual actions, to laws, and to public policies, and we think in each case that if they are unjust this is a strong, maybe even conclusive, reason to reject them. Justice is usually said to exist when a person receives that to which he or she is entitled, namely, exactly those benefits and burdens that are due the individual because of his or her particular characteristics and circumstances. If someone states that a certain person or act is good or moral or virtuous, he or she does not necessarily mean that that person or act is just.Classically, justice was counted as one of the four cardinal virtues (and sometimes as the most important of the four), in modern times John Rawls famously described it as «the first virtue of social institutions» There is debate which of these realms of practical philosophy has first claim on justice: is it first and foremost a property of the law, for example, and only derivatively a property of individuals and other institutions. But it is probably more enlightening to accept that the idea has over time sunk deep roots in each of these domains, and to try to make sense of such a wide-ranging concept by identifying elements that are present whenever justice is invoked, but also examining the different forms it takes in various practical contexts. This article aims to provide a general map of the ways in which justice has been understood by philosophers, past and present.At first examine some major conceptual contrasts: between conservative and ideal justice, between corrective and distributive justice, between procedural and substantive justice, and between comparative and non-comparative justice. There is a question whether non-human animals can be subjects of justice, whether justice applies only between people who already stand in a particular kind of relationship to one another, and whether individual people continue to have duties of justice once justice-based institutions have been created. Then examine three overarching theories that might serve to unify the different forms of justice: utilitarianism, contractarianism, and egalitarianis. ; Проведен комплексный герменевтический анализ фемомену справедливости, как социокультурного явления, носящего междисциплинарный и исторически структурированный характер. ; Проведено комплексний герменевтичний аналіз фемомену справедливості, як соціокультурного явища, що носить міждисциплінарний і історично-структурований характер.

The article emphasizes that excessive social inequality suppresses the motivational sphere of human consciousness, leads to a loss of faith in social justice and the common good for the whole population, undermining the moral foundations of social and political unity and consent. Due to these circumstances from the socio-political sphere, public policy excludes a large part of society. It is possible to record a reduced interest in politics and the decline of political activity, which manifests itself in participation in the activities of public and party organizations, in elections of different levels. Political poverty primarily affects equality of access and social recognition, and thus the minimum requirements for effective participation in political life, or adequate social and political functioning. ; В статті наголошується, що надмірна соціальна нерівність пригнічує мотиваційну сферу людської свідомості, веде до втрати віри в соціальну справедливість і загальне благо для всього населення, підриває моральні основи суспільної та політичної єдності і згоди. Внаслідок цих обставин з соціально-політичної сфери, публічної політики виключається велика частина суспільства. Можна зафіксувати знижений інтерес до політики і спад політичної активності, що виявляється в участі в діяльності громадських і партійних організацій, у виборах різних рівнів. Політична бідність перш за все визначає рівність доступу і соціального визнання, і таким чином, мінімальні вимоги для ефективної участі в політичному житті, або адекватному суспільно-політичному функціонуванні.

The article emphasizes that excessive social inequality suppresses the motivational sphere of human consciousness, leads to a loss of faith in social justice and the common good for the whole population, undermining the moral foundations of social and political unity and consent. Due to these circumstances from the socio-political sphere, public policy excludes a large part of society. It is possible to record a reduced interest in politics and the decline of political activity, which manifests itself in participation in the activities of public and party organizations, in elections of different levels. Political poverty primarily affects equality of access and social recognition, and thus the minimum requirements for effective participation in political life, or adequate social and political functioning. ; В статті наголошується, що надмірна соціальна нерівність пригнічує мотиваційну сферу людської свідомості, веде до втрати віри в соціальну справедливість і загальне благо для всього населення, підриває моральні основи суспільної та політичної єдності і згоди. Внаслідок цих обставин з соціально-політичної сфери, публічної політики виключається велика частина суспільства. Можна зафіксувати знижений інтерес до політики і спад політичної активності, що виявляється в участі в діяльності громадських і партійних організацій, у виборах різних рівнів. Політична бідність перш за все визначає рівність доступу і соціального визнання, і таким чином, мінімальні вимоги для ефективної участі в політичному житті, або адекватному суспільно-політичному функціонуванні.

The author's starting point is the idea of justice which can be traced back to Aristotle's philosophy and ought to underlie contemporary nation-building. Justice is viewed in its synthetic meaning embracing ethical, political, and law aspects. However, a pivotal role of moral justice is emphasized, for the development of social relations system depends primarily on it. Justice as a regulatory category also preconditions individuals' free activity that is an up-to-date issue in contemporary Ukrainian society. In article substantive provisions of the theory of the justice which has been put forward by John Rawls are considered. The analysis of substantive provisions of this theory, an approach to the problem of philosophers G.L.A. Hart and P. Ricker is considered. ; Автор виходить із того, що ідея справедливості, що вперше теоретично була розроблена ще Аристотелем, у сучасних суспільствах повинна відігравати роль засадничого принципу державного будівництва. У статті розглядаються основні положення теорії справедливості, розробленої Дж. Ролзом. Проводиться аналіз основних положень цієї теорії, зіставлення її з поглядами Г.Л.А. Харта та П. Рікера щодо даної проблематики.

Аналізуються механізми соціальної політики в європейських країнах, шляхи реформування системи державного фінансування з метою підвищення ефективності їхнього використання та скорочення державних витрат. Досліджено сутність європейської соціальної моделі, основні характеристики, передумови виникнення, етапи формування, досвід впровадження в ЄС та перспективи розвитку.Окреслено сім соціальних чинників, що вказують на корисність застосування принципів європейської соціальної моделі в Україні. ; Анализируются механизмы социальной политики в европейских странах, пути реформирования системы государственного финансирования с целью повышения эффективности их использования и сокращения государственных расходов. Исследована сущность европейской социальной модели, основные характеристики, предпосылки возникновения, этапы формирования, опыт внедрения в ЕС и перспективы развития. Определены семь социальных факторов, указывающих на полезность применения принципов европейской социальной модели в Украине. ; The term «social dimension» introduced into the scholar language a few years ago has embraced all the social problems as well as the theory and practice of social planning. Following the economic integration, the European Community has started social integration. To develop successfully any society needs a model which it chooses into line with its requirements, traditions, values and norms. Europe has been create model called «European social model» (ESM). The so-called «social core», special treatment of people, defense of his political, democratic and social rights is its characteristic feature. The principles laid down in the ESM are following: social solidarity and cohesion, social justice, the creation of competitive economy based on knowledge, careful treatment of the environment.This experience has been achieved in the course of the development of European integration process. The EU has been able to evaluate its advantages and to come across inevitable difficulties. As the integration expands and deepens, new opportunities for Europe appear, various aspects of its further evolution open. The successes of the economic integration quite rightly make it possible to raise the question about political integration. The social integration not only joins the general process but becomes the priority of the 21st century capable of becoming a connecting link of all aspects of the European integration, moreover, of influencing their efficiency and progressive development of the European community

The article analyzes the phenomenon of social solidarity of the diaspora as one of the main directions of development of modern society in the context of challenges related to the problem of COVID-19. The analysis of social principles and genesis of comprehension of the category of social solidarity and cohesion on the materials of social philosophy is carried out. The essence of the main scientific approaches to the study of the concepts of social solidarity and cohesion is determined. Solidarity in work is seen as one of the prerequisites for stability and social order. The modern scientific definition of "social solidarity" in the social sciences means the unity of a group, class, or action that generates unity of interests, goals, standards, and mutual understanding. Solidarity processes by modern foreign and domestic researchers today are associated primarily with such phenomena as cooperation, cohesion, unity, public trust, the presence of common ideas, views and goals. Although social cohesion seems a difficult concept to study, researchers note its extreme importance in detailing the category of solidarity as a wide range of components: mutual assistance, trust, perception of difference, perception of justice, social inclusion, and so on. Since the spread of the COVID-19 virus and disease, people around the world have faced a large-scale emergency and an incomprehensible situation that is new to most modern societies. Therefore, the socio-cultural understanding of the pandemic as a global problem today acquires special significance for the search for the foundations of social cohesion, as a means of reducing tensions and social solidarity of communities. The authors argue that it is social solidarity and cohesion of the diaspora of communities and communities that is an effective means of social counteraction to modern destructive factors and challenges.

The main condition for establishment and development of independent polish justice was the independence of Poland in November 1918. It was complicated as Poland lost its independence a century ago and was the part of the three empires (The Tsar Poland, so called the West land – Volyn, Polissya and westukrainian lands were the part of the Tsar Russia; Halychyna was the part of Austrian Empire; Empire Gogentzolernys-other polish territories). Each of these territories inherited correspondent judicial system and variety corporations of judges which were the carriers of different traditions and principals. That's why the most painful question, which arrised before polish power was the problem of judges' staff for the polish courts.The most necessary fact that defined the formation and the activity of the judges' corpus was the development and adoption of the legislature. March Constitution 1921 was one of the important stage in the formation and functioning of the judicial system, which defined the legal status of the judges in the first years of renewed Polish Republic. The Constitution carried the legal guarantees of the judges' corpus independence from the executive power. However, after the state upheaval 1926, which opened the way to authoritarian regime establishment in Poland. Polish power tried to limit the independence of judges. In the law «About the organization of general courts» 1928, one could see the statements which restricted the independence of the judges. Judges' corpus found itself dependent from the high executive power. In the following years this Law was changed accordingly to the needs of the power, which became too authoritarian. The power wanted to strengthen its influence both on the staff of the judicial power and on their general guidance. These changes concerned first of all the judges' independence, particularly the questions connected with the appointment and transmission of the judges to another work, judges' competence. The April Constitution 1935 created the conditions for most of judges from the executive power: the freedom in the government activities grew as to the procedure of the judges' appointments; the basis of the collective nature in the judges' sentencing was essentially limited; the judges' immunity was narrowed. Thus, the factors, which reflected socio-political struggle in country influenced on the formation and activity of the judges' corpus. The choice of the judges according to the character and power needs acquired the independent meaning. The main content and the realization of the justice were manifested in the judges' activities as agents of the certain policy.The quality of the judges' staff was influenced the objective factors too. That considered the material position of the judges, problems in the system of the judges' staff etc. ; Визначено проблеми формування суддівського корпусу в міжвоєнній Польщі; дослід­жено правовий та соціальний статус суддів в контексті суспільно-політичного розвитку.

Shelever N. V. Implementation of the principle of social justice in relationship with social support in the condition of the COVID-19 pandemic: experience of the Ukraine and European Union countries. – Article.In the article the author investigates the implementation of the principle of social justice in the relationship of social support during the pandemic of the coronavirus COVID-19. Social support is an organizational and legal form of social security. Due to the lack of research on the implementation of the principle of justice inrelations with social support of Ukrainians during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic, the author aims to study the national experience on this issue and the experience of leading European countries to implement it into domestic legislation. In the article the author draws attention to the fact that the support of the state should be based on the principle of justice, and in our state such a principle is very often violated. The sphere of social support is no exception. Currently, the consequence of such a violation is legal nihilism, mass migration of Ukrainians to the member states of the European Union.An analysis of the current legislation states that social support of the population, paradoxically, is not the duty of the state, but only its right. Ukraine's social security system is imperfect, and the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic has resulted in even higher unemployment and «working poor». During the quarantine, Ukraine signed a loan agreement and received funds to support vulnerable groups. However, CEDOS recognizes Ukraine's housing policy as socially unfair, as the state provides subsidies to people who are not poor. This organization identifies the following socially vulnerable categories of persons: internally displaced persons, young people, migrants. In Australia, business investment support is provided; supported cash flows for employers; payments are made to households to support their growth. According to the author, in Ukraine the violation of the principle of ...