Der Autor betrachtet 'African business' innerhalb eines theoretischen Rahmens sozialer Verantwortung. Er skizziert verschiedene Bedrohungen von Gesellschaft und Umwelt und zeigt, daß vor allem Klein- und Mittelbetriebe die größte Bedrohung darstellen. Er fordert eine Sonderkommission der OAU, die nicht nur Empfehlungen an die afrikanischen Regierungen erarbeiten, sondern auch mit den multilateralen Entwicklungsagenturen neue Umweltstandards aushandeln soll. (DÜI-Sth)
The definition of social responsibility has often changed over the time. Differences in the economies of the United States of America (USA) and Europe have a strong impact on the social responsibility and stakeholders' expectations from socially responsible business (SRB). The economic sector of the USA makes a significant contribution to addressing social and development initiatives in the local community, while in European countries there is an expectation that the state will meet such needs. The globalization processes transfer American corporate culture all around the world, as well as the engagement in solving social problems in the communities in which they operate. The economic model of social responsibility puts the profit motivation into the first place and emphasizes that it is the most effective tool for solving the world problems. The new circumstances in which businesses operate and the fact that information are available always and everywhere have a strong influence on the evolution of the social responsibility model from the economic to the socio-economic model. The role of business is not just to make profit, but also to cooperate between companies and society, and a balanced benefit for all stakeholders. This work consists of three parts. The introduction describes a traditional and new approach to social responsibility and benefits for companies that operate under the principles of social responsibility. The second chapter outlines European Union (EU) guidelines on SRB while concluding remarks synthesize the benefits of social responsibility in modern business as well as the critiques of the model. This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The definition of social responsibility has often changed over the time. Differences in the economies of the United States of America (USA) and Europe have a strong impact on the social responsibility and stakeholders' expectations from socially responsible business (SRB). The economic sector of the USA makes a significant contribution to addressing social and development initiatives in the local community, while in European countries there is an expectation that the state will meet such needs. The globalization processes transfer American corporate culture all around the world, as well as the engagement in solving social problems in the communities in which they operate. The economic model of social responsibility puts the profit motivation into the first place and emphasizes that it is the most effective tool for solving the world problems. The new circumstances in which businesses operate and the fact that information are available always and everywhere have a strong influence on the evolution of the social responsibility model from the economic to the socio-economic model. The role of business is not just to make profit, but also to cooperate between companies and society, and a balanced benefit for all stakeholders. This work consists of three parts. The introduction describes a traditional and new approach to social responsibility and benefits for companies that operate under the principles of social responsibility. The second chapter outlines European Union (EU) guidelines on SRB while concluding remarks synthesize the benefits of social responsibility in modern business as well as the critiques of the model.
The definition of social responsibility has often changed over the time. Differences in the economies of the United States of America (USA) and Europe have a strong impact on the social responsibility and stakeholders' expectations from socially responsible business (SRB). The economic sector of the USA makes a significant contribution to addressing social and development initiatives in the local community, while in European countries there is an expectation that the state will meet such needs. The globalization processes transfer American corporate culture all around the world, as well as the engagement in solving social problems in the communities in which they operate. The economic model of social responsibility puts the profit motivation into the first place and emphasizes that it is the most effective tool for solving the world problems. The new circumstances in which businesses operate and the fact that information are available always and everywhere have a strong influence on the evolution of the social responsibility model from the economic to the socio-economic model. The role of business is not just to make profit, but also to cooperate between companies and society, and a balanced benefit for all stakeholders. This work consists of three parts. The introduction describes a traditional and new approach to social responsibility and benefits for companies that operate under the principles of social responsibility. The second chapter outlines European Union (EU) guidelines on SRB while concluding remarks synthesize the benefits of social responsibility in modern business as well as the critiques of the model. This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Den Sonderband eröffnet ein Beitrag von Kirchmayer, Remišová und Lašáková über ethische Führung in öffentlichen und privaten Organisationen in der Slowakei. Authentische Führung und zwischenmenschliche Konflikte in Polen werden von Sypniewska und Gigol weiter aufgegriffen. Die Wahrnehmung des ethischen Klimas in der serbischen Tourismusindustrie wird von Dragin, Jovanović, Mijatov, Majstorović und Dragin untersucht. Prus untersucht die Förderung einer nachhaltigen Landwirtschaft durch die gezielte Hochschulbildung zur Landwirtschaft in Polen. Saveanu, Abrudan, Saveanu und Matei fordern, die Prädiktoren für CSR in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen in Rumänien zu erforschen. Potocan, Mulej und Nedelko versuchen, die Einstellungen der Mitarbeiter zu natürlichen, sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Aspekten von CSR in slowenischen Organisationen während zweier Perioden - Wirtschaftskrise und Erholung für einen Kontext nach dem Übergang - empirisch zu untersuchen. Rybnikova und Toleikienė wenden sich den formalen und informellen Elementen der Infrastruktur für das Ethikmanagement in der litauischen Selbstverwaltung zu. Diese Ausgabe schließt mit einem Forschungsbericht über die Entwicklung der Nachhaltigkeit (Moral und Verantwortung) in der estnischen Wirtschaft durch Kooskora und Cundiff.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Social responsibility of a modern type of entrepreneur should become not just a legislatively normative phenomenon, but a deeply personal philosophical basis of economic, industrial, commercial and socio-cultural activity. Social activity, formation and development of human capital are key characteristics of the type of thinking and action of a modern entrepreneur
THE VICTORY OF MARKET DEMOCRACY HAS NOT LED TO ANY MATERIAL OR SOCIAL IMPROVEMENT FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION. LABOR STANDARDS OFTEN REMAIN APPALLING. THIS ARTICLE OFFERS SUGGESTIONS ON ENFORCING A SOCIAL CLAUSE. IT EXPLORES THE RESPONSIBILITY OF INTERNATIONAL BODIES, AND MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS, AND THE FEASIBILITY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE UNION NETWORKS.