Suchergebnisse

The object of this dissertation of graduation is the place of Culture in a context of Knowledge society. The main aim is to introduce possibilities of digital code and to check out if Lithuanian society is already ready for to accept e-culture as one more alternative in their lives. It is very important to stress the meaning of the Cultural production in a new way of Economy that is based on a creative branch. So this is a reason why reader is introduced to the technique of Cultures' planning in a first chapter. Cultural organizations have long been protected from the harsh realities of the marketplace by relying on wealthy patrons or public subsidies. But as these sources of finance become scarcer they now find that they have to compete for an audience. Some have adjusted to this new reality, but many have not. Cultural planning in a context of knowledge society is the process of aligning cultural activities and organizations in a given area - usually geographic - in a way that helps to ensure they are mutually supportive and contribute effectively to other specific social, political or economic ambitions - such as encouraging social inclusion or attracting tourists or investors to an area. There is a wide range of contexts in which planning takes place, from the legislatively mandated (currently the case in the United Kingdom) to the predominately voluntary (as in the United States). There are also many ways of going about planning, many stumbling blocks between good intentions and effective policies, and many a well-considered and viable policy that goes unimplemented. Challenges for e-culture are visible with regard to fragmentation, multilingualism, re-usability if content, configuration of knowledge realms and suitable application levels that effectively relate to users' and heritage institutions' demands It is also introducing three investigations accomplished by thesis writer as well by State Institutions in a field of Cultural innovations and reclaims of Culture Users. This dissertation of graduation is useful for Culture managers, Official Persons who are responsible for dissemination of digital code an e-culture, for people who make political decisions on Culture Politics. It is useful for students of arts management or those who hope to work in the cultural industries.

The object of this dissertation of graduation is the place of Culture in a context of Knowledge society. The main aim is to introduce possibilities of digital code and to check out if Lithuanian society is already ready for to accept e-culture as one more alternative in their lives. It is very important to stress the meaning of the Cultural production in a new way of Economy that is based on a creative branch. So this is a reason why reader is introduced to the technique of Cultures' planning in a first chapter. Cultural organizations have long been protected from the harsh realities of the marketplace by relying on wealthy patrons or public subsidies. But as these sources of finance become scarcer they now find that they have to compete for an audience. Some have adjusted to this new reality, but many have not. Cultural planning in a context of knowledge society is the process of aligning cultural activities and organizations in a given area - usually geographic - in a way that helps to ensure they are mutually supportive and contribute effectively to other specific social, political or economic ambitions - such as encouraging social inclusion or attracting tourists or investors to an area. There is a wide range of contexts in which planning takes place, from the legislatively mandated (currently the case in the United Kingdom) to the predominately voluntary (as in the United States). There are also many ways of going about planning, many stumbling blocks between good intentions and effective policies, and many a well-considered and viable policy that goes unimplemented. Challenges for e-culture are visible with regard to fragmentation, multilingualism, re-usability if content, configuration of knowledge realms and suitable application levels that effectively relate to users' and heritage institutions' demands It is also introducing three investigations accomplished by thesis writer as well by State Institutions in a field of Cultural innovations and reclaims of Culture Users. This dissertation of graduation is useful for Culture managers, Official Persons who are responsible for dissemination of digital code an e-culture, for people who make political decisions on Culture Politics. It is useful for students of arts management or those who hope to work in the cultural industries.

The object of this dissertation of graduation is the place of Culture in a context of Knowledge society. The main aim is to introduce possibilities of digital code and to check out if Lithuanian society is already ready for to accept e-culture as one more alternative in their lives. It is very important to stress the meaning of the Cultural production in a new way of Economy that is based on a creative branch. So this is a reason why reader is introduced to the technique of Cultures' planning in a first chapter. Cultural organizations have long been protected from the harsh realities of the marketplace by relying on wealthy patrons or public subsidies. But as these sources of finance become scarcer they now find that they have to compete for an audience. Some have adjusted to this new reality, but many have not. Cultural planning in a context of knowledge society is the process of aligning cultural activities and organizations in a given area - usually geographic - in a way that helps to ensure they are mutually supportive and contribute effectively to other specific social, political or economic ambitions - such as encouraging social inclusion or attracting tourists or investors to an area. There is a wide range of contexts in which planning takes place, from the legislatively mandated (currently the case in the United Kingdom) to the predominately voluntary (as in the United States). There are also many ways of going about planning, many stumbling blocks between good intentions and effective policies, and many a well-considered and viable policy that goes unimplemented. Challenges for e-culture are visible with regard to fragmentation, multilingualism, re-usability if content, configuration of knowledge realms and suitable application levels that effectively relate to users' and heritage institutions' demands It is also introducing three investigations accomplished by thesis writer as well by State Institutions in a field of Cultural innovations and reclaims of Culture Users. This dissertation of graduation is useful for Culture managers, Official Persons who are responsible for dissemination of digital code an e-culture, for people who make political decisions on Culture Politics. It is useful for students of arts management or those who hope to work in the cultural industries.

The perception of criminal justice in society is a controversial social problem. Traditionally, criminal justice issues have ban treated as a matter of professional interest for criminologists, criminal justice experts and other profesionals from related fields. But is expert knowledge the only valid kind when it comes to criminal justice topics? This question, though rhetorical, is aimed at stimulating discussian about the co-existence of different types of social knowledge on criminal justice, and their impact on various discourses concerning crime and punishment in society. In this article a group of researchers from Vilnim University makes use of phenomenological methods to analyse three different types of discourse on criminal justice: professional, political and public. The professional discourse of criminal justice is scrutinised from tbe perspective of penal law, the political discourse from the point of view of macroeconomics, while the public discourse is analysed using ideas drawn from psychology and media studies. The analysis of these discourses seeks to examine the social construction of criminal justice, and the particularities of its reception among professionals, politicians and a wider public.

The perception of criminal justice in society is a controversial social problem. Traditionally, criminal justice issues have ban treated as a matter of professional interest for criminologists, criminal justice experts and other profesionals from related fields. But is expert knowledge the only valid kind when it comes to criminal justice topics? This question, though rhetorical, is aimed at stimulating discussian about the co-existence of different types of social knowledge on criminal justice, and their impact on various discourses concerning crime and punishment in society. In this article a group of researchers from Vilnim University makes use of phenomenological methods to analyse three different types of discourse on criminal justice: professional, political and public. The professional discourse of criminal justice is scrutinised from tbe perspective of penal law, the political discourse from the point of view of macroeconomics, while the public discourse is analysed using ideas drawn from psychology and media studies. The analysis of these discourses seeks to examine the social construction of criminal justice, and the particularities of its reception among professionals, politicians and a wider public.

The perception of criminal justice in society is a controversial social problem. Traditionally, criminal justice issues have ban treated as a matter of professional interest for criminologists, criminal justice experts and other profesionals from related fields. But is expert knowledge the only valid kind when it comes to criminal justice topics? This question, though rhetorical, is aimed at stimulating discussian about the co-existence of different types of social knowledge on criminal justice, and their impact on various discourses concerning crime and punishment in society. In this article a group of researchers from Vilnim University makes use of phenomenological methods to analyse three different types of discourse on criminal justice: professional, political and public. The professional discourse of criminal justice is scrutinised from tbe perspective of penal law, the political discourse from the point of view of macroeconomics, while the public discourse is analysed using ideas drawn from psychology and media studies. The analysis of these discourses seeks to examine the social construction of criminal justice, and the particularities of its reception among professionals, politicians and a wider public.

The perception of criminal justice in society is a controversial social problem. Traditionally, criminal justice issues have ban treated as a matter of professional interest for criminologists, criminal justice experts and other profesionals from related fields. But is expert knowledge the only valid kind when it comes to criminal justice topics? This question, though rhetorical, is aimed at stimulating discussian about the co-existence of different types of social knowledge on criminal justice, and their impact on various discourses concerning crime and punishment in society. In this article a group of researchers from Vilnim University makes use of phenomenological methods to analyse three different types of discourse on criminal justice: professional, political and public. The professional discourse of criminal justice is scrutinised from tbe perspective of penal law, the political discourse from the point of view of macroeconomics, while the public discourse is analysed using ideas drawn from psychology and media studies. The analysis of these discourses seeks to examine the social construction of criminal justice, and the particularities of its reception among professionals, politicians and a wider public.

The perception of criminal justice in society is a controversial social problem. Traditionally, criminal justice issues have ban treated as a matter of professional interest for criminologists, criminal justice experts and other profesionals from related fields. But is expert knowledge the only valid kind when it comes to criminal justice topics? This question, though rhetorical, is aimed at stimulating discussian about the co-existence of different types of social knowledge on criminal justice, and their impact on various discourses concerning crime and punishment in society. In this article a group of researchers from Vilnim University makes use of phenomenological methods to analyse three different types of discourse on criminal justice: professional, political and public. The professional discourse of criminal justice is scrutinised from tbe perspective of penal law, the political discourse from the point of view of macroeconomics, while the public discourse is analysed using ideas drawn from psychology and media studies. The analysis of these discourses seeks to examine the social construction of criminal justice, and the particularities of its reception among professionals, politicians and a wider public.

The perception of criminal justice in society is a controversial social problem. Traditionally, criminal justice issues have ban treated as a matter of professional interest for criminologists, criminal justice experts and other profesionals from related fields. But is expert knowledge the only valid kind when it comes to criminal justice topics? This question, though rhetorical, is aimed at stimulating discussian about the co-existence of different types of social knowledge on criminal justice, and their impact on various discourses concerning crime and punishment in society. In this article a group of researchers from Vilnim University makes use of phenomenological methods to analyse three different types of discourse on criminal justice: professional, political and public. The professional discourse of criminal justice is scrutinised from tbe perspective of penal law, the political discourse from the point of view of macroeconomics, while the public discourse is analysed using ideas drawn from psychology and media studies. The analysis of these discourses seeks to examine the social construction of criminal justice, and the particularities of its reception among professionals, politicians and a wider public.

In the globalization process, integration of Lithuanian educational system into the European Union educational space enhances many requirements for schools leaders and teachers. Today's school is in need of high competence teachers and tutors. They not only have to be competent, to have deep professional knowledge and skills, but also keep improving their own professional qualification. Teachers have to be able to influence changes to existing processes of schools operations. Taking in consideration these facts, the problem of this research arises – the traditional role of a teacher is no longer suitable for multifunctional education of nowadays society. The object of the research – ever-changing roles of the teacher in nowadays society. The aim of the research – to analyze the new roles of the teacher and their fluctuation of peculiarities. The targets for the research: 1. To analyze the historical evolution of teachers role. 2. To specify the influence of teachers role in the fluctuation of educational processes. 3. To find out the point of views of teachers on their own most important roles in nowadays society. Focus of the research: 150 teachers from the four school of basic education located in capital of Lithuania. The methods of research: theoretical analysis of historical documents and publications, the anonymous questionnaire, the statistic analysis of the data based on SPSS13. After the completion of the empiric research, the original hypothesis that teachers are accepting all roles from the theoretical approach was proven to be correct. The negative factors off teacher roles among the examinees were listed the following: the teacher working with the group of pupils regardless the individual needs, the inability to constructively solve the problems and while solving problems not taking into consideration parental opinion. The traditional roles of teacher as subject tutor and class educator gained new activity prospective. The most emphasized roles are: an innovator, a consultant, a motivator, an explorer, a stimulator and witness of change, a social worker and a collaborating colleague. Most recent roles of teacher are manager of the educational process and the creator of alternatives.

In the globalization process, integration of Lithuanian educational system into the European Union educational space enhances many requirements for schools leaders and teachers. Today's school is in need of high competence teachers and tutors. They not only have to be competent, to have deep professional knowledge and skills, but also keep improving their own professional qualification. Teachers have to be able to influence changes to existing processes of schools operations. Taking in consideration these facts, the problem of this research arises – the traditional role of a teacher is no longer suitable for multifunctional education of nowadays society. The object of the research – ever-changing roles of the teacher in nowadays society. The aim of the research – to analyze the new roles of the teacher and their fluctuation of peculiarities. The targets for the research: 1. To analyze the historical evolution of teachers role. 2. To specify the influence of teachers role in the fluctuation of educational processes. 3. To find out the point of views of teachers on their own most important roles in nowadays society. Focus of the research: 150 teachers from the four school of basic education located in capital of Lithuania. The methods of research: theoretical analysis of historical documents and publications, the anonymous questionnaire, the statistic analysis of the data based on SPSS13. After the completion of the empiric research, the original hypothesis that teachers are accepting all roles from the theoretical approach was proven to be correct. The negative factors off teacher roles among the examinees were listed the following: the teacher working with the group of pupils regardless the individual needs, the inability to constructively solve the problems and while solving problems not taking into consideration parental opinion. The traditional roles of teacher as subject tutor and class educator gained new activity prospective. The most emphasized roles are: an innovator, a consultant, a motivator, an explorer, a stimulator and witness of change, a social worker and a collaborating colleague. Most recent roles of teacher are manager of the educational process and the creator of alternatives.

Active development of new media must be responded with clear and timely changes in legal regulation. The concept of information society media was introduced for the first time in 2006, when a new edition of the Law on provision of information to the public was adopted. The article reviews earlier legislation, systematically analyses Lithuanian legal regulation, and identifies practical problems. The article provides a structural analysis of information society media, which is based on its legal status, identifies weaknesses of the legal regulation and conceptual issues. Conclusions are made that different legal acts are not harmonised, there are conditions for collisions between legal norms, uniform explanation, and implementation of the legal norms is very difficult.

Active development of new media must be responded with clear and timely changes in legal regulation. The concept of information society media was introduced for the first time in 2006, when a new edition of the Law on provision of information to the public was adopted. The article reviews earlier legislation, systematically analyses Lithuanian legal regulation, and identifies practical problems. The article provides a structural analysis of information society media, which is based on its legal status, identifies weaknesses of the legal regulation and conceptual issues. Conclusions are made that different legal acts are not harmonised, there are conditions for collisions between legal norms, uniform explanation, and implementation of the legal norms is very difficult.

This textbook is addressed to students involved in studying the subject of Social economy and local development. The discourse of the book lays on the background of European definition of Social economy subject and presents main forms of social economy players, which are cooperatives, mutuals, associations and funds. The main emphasis is stressed on social economic partnership between three major sectors of modern society – governmental, business and the third (voluntary, private, non-governmental) sector – partnership, which gives civil society an opportunity of economic involvement. The aim of this textbook is to guide students through the process of studying the subject in structured way and also to engage wider academical-practical discussions on the emerging social economy sector in Lithuania.

This textbook is addressed to students involved in studying the subject of Social economy and local development. The discourse of the book lays on the background of European definition of Social economy subject and presents main forms of social economy players, which are cooperatives, mutuals, associations and funds. The main emphasis is stressed on social economic partnership between three major sectors of modern society – governmental, business and the third (voluntary, private, non-governmental) sector – partnership, which gives civil society an opportunity of economic involvement. The aim of this textbook is to guide students through the process of studying the subject in structured way and also to engage wider academical-practical discussions on the emerging social economy sector in Lithuania.