Modern society is on the stage, which is characterized by new economic and ideological positions. With the development of information in today's world, humanity is moving to a new stage of development, namely the post-industrial society whose core values is information and knowledge. Purpose. Description of industrial society and the definition of stage the development of Ukrainian society today. Results. Physical work is changing by mental work in most developed countries since the 20th century. The intellectual potential of human, her skills and ability is the main resource in the post-industrial society. The representatives of intellectual work are appearing in the job market. These workers are the joint owners and separating gains. It is serving as encouragement to enhance of their creativity. This situation leads to a decent financial reward and improving of material living standards and is a potential incentive for new motivational system. The gained knowledge applied in the production process and provided the main source of added value. It makes the human and her work a basic mechanism of post-industrial economy. The negative factor is the trends in labor migration, namely the departure of skilled workers overseas. Originality. Attempt of Ukrainian society enter into European economic and political space indicates the presence in Ukrainian youth especially creative approach to labor relations on this day. Ukrainians are oriented to individual success, recognition in society, professionalism, competitive and this shows their awareness in construction of post-industrial society. Conclusion. Service industry, recreation and education play a primary role in post-industrial society. Investment in human capital is needed for Ukraine to improve the quality and results of work.
Introduction. Informative revolution of end and distribution of internet-technologies conduces to the sharp strengthening of economic, political and cultural globalization societies, forming of the new social mode, when network streams, network structures and network co-operations, become basis of organization of society. By the most meaningful sources for research of modern network society, organization of that is base on global information technologies there is a scientific inheritance of М. Castells, P. Drucker, М. Porter, H. Etzkowitz, L. Leydesdorff. Only scientific vision of network processes of society, their essence, kinds, structure, functions is however absent, contradiction, factors of development and management mechanisms in new realities of development of civilization.Purpose. The aim of the article of theoretical and methodological ground of network models of organization of society and mechanisms of management of him by political, economic and sociocultural spheres in the conditions of globalization. Methodological basis of research is dialectical principle of cognition, the system, civilization, sinergistical going near the study of the public phenomena and processes, fundamental positions of theory of development of society and management. The cultural and historical is used, historical and anthropological, sociocultural methods that allowed to investigate network organization of society in intersubject cuts.Results. Essence of networks and their kinds are exposed in the wild and society. A structure, role and place of functional networks, is certain in the system of organization of society. The criteria of division of public social networks are specified on a territorial sign. The features of social are distinguished networks in accordance with the stages of development of civilization. Credible directions of network development of post-industrial society are reasonable. The basic models of the organizational mode of public social networks are analysed. The mechanisms of management of vital functions of new society subsystems are worked out.Originality. The scientific novelty of the got results consists in the use of, civilization and sinergistical approaches of the systems in explanation of processes of network organization of society and mechanisms of management of him by political, economic and sociocultural spheres in the conditions of globalization.Conclusions. The network models of organization of society and mechanisms of management of him are reasonable by political, economic and sociocultural spheres in the conditions of globalizationThe practical value of the got results shows up in possibility of the use of them in the process of development of strategy of construction of new society, him organizational structure and control system. The prospects of further scientific secret services can be deepening of researches of separate types of network structures.
Introduction. Triangle of socioeconomic relations in Ukraine: status and prospects.Purpose. To analyse the level of relations of mutual socioeconomic responsibility between the state, population and business in Ukraine; to argue the necessity as well as ways of their improvement.Results. Argued the expediency of socioeconomic relations consideration from a specific point of view (state – population – business) by using a model of a regular triangle with its top on high and irregular triangle with the top at the foot; proved a diverse character of the mentioned relations in case of their formation by using different models; developed recommendations as for socioeconomic relations improvement from the point of view: state – population – business in Ukraine.Originality. Designed the model of relations of mutual socioeconomic responsibility between the state, population and business.Conclusion. In the relations of mutual socioeconomic responsibility between the state, population and business in Ukraine equality of subjects is lacking. This influences negatively the development of the economy.
The round-table sitting dedicated to the Russian-Ukrainian war took place on October 24, 2014. The question was, in particular, of its cultural and historical factors and peculiarities of the conflict of consciousnesses in the course of Ukraine-Russia opposition. The participants have analyzed the phenomenon of the hybrid war as anomia, outlined a rational system of ensuring national security. There have been represented the original interpretation of the war discourse and euphemisation of political leaders' language as the reduction of truth. The myth of the "Russian world" was considered as the basis of mobilization strategies of the aggressor and cognitive structure of its strategic culture. The correlation between philosophic traditions and the method of fighting the war have been outlined. ; Круглий стіл «Філософської думки»
The article analyzes the factors that negatively influence the modernization of Ukrainian society and, in particular, the reformation of its military sphere. Therefore, it is concluded that we need to clarify the content of a number of concepts concerning the status of Ukrainian society, the Russian-Ukrainian war, taking into account the experience of the new independent states. This will enable to form adequate and, if necessary, asymmetric answers to the internal and external challenges facing Ukraine at the present stage. The author proposes that the incentive for the formation of the responses are integrated concept of modernization of all spheres of Ukrainian society. The core of the reform should be the military sphere. It is precisely military reform that will allow a revival of a powerful defense-industrial complex. This, in turn, will contribute to the industrialization of our state. At the same time, as a result of military reform, a "new model of the army" should appear, new approaches to the Russian-Ukrainian war as a whole should emerge.
The article reveals the content of the category of Smart-society and correlates the legal categories of "Smart-society" and "information society". It was found that the information society is inextricably linked with the development and dissemination of the role of information and communication technologies, the availability of an appropriate information sector of technology, a high level of information culture in all spheres of public life, accessibility and transparency. It is noted that the category "Smart" means smart, one that promotes the development of smart technologies and the formation of a smart society, the transition of "traditional" information society to a knowledge society or Smart-society, whose guiding paradigm is the desire to improve all spheres of human life. to create a new quality of life. Smart-society is a new model of information society, which permeates all spheres of public life, namely – economic, political, social, spiritual, cultural, educational spheres of life. The correlation between the legal categories "information society" and "smart society" allowed us to say that they have both common and different characteristics. The common features include the following: 1) these categories are quite similar, but not identical; 2) they appeared in one period (in the early 1960s); 3) both are inextricably linked to the information sector; 4) apply to all spheres of public life; 5) determined by the development of information and communication technologies. It is noted that there are some differences between them, the main of which is the inseparability of the Smart-society with digital technologies, while the information society is not so dependent on Smart-technologies. It is concluded that the Smart-society is a new, more modern form of information society, which is characterized by its own features and specific characteristics. ; У статті розкрито зміст категорії Smart-суспільства та здійснено співвідношення правових категорії «Smart-суспільство» та «інформаційне суспільство». ...
Current century is the century of the global information society. It is characterized by events caused by the information and telecommunication revolution, introduction of information technology to all areas of public life, development of the global information economy, introduction of e-government to public and private sectors, formation of global network society.But before developing into the global, the information society has progressed from the origins of theories on its formation to development and adjustment of information and communication technologies to the public life area of the world leading countries. The article deals with the information society development in the globalized world. In particular, the first theories that characterized the birth of the information society and its formation in modern conditions have been considered.It is indicated that in conditions of globalization, information and knowledge will become the most important means by which communications are taking place in modern society. While, due to spreading glo- balization processes, the global information society is emerging, characterized by integrating information systems into a single world economy.Issues of information society development for several years have been on the agenda of such leading world countries as the United States, Japan and the countries of the European Union. Since the information society in modern conditions is responsible for raising the living standards of of the popula- tion, more and more countries are beginning to engage into the building of this type of society. The same applies to Ukraine. ; У статті дається аналіз трансформації інформаційного суспільства, яку воно пройшло від початку його зародження до утворення глобального інформаційного середовища. Розглянуто перші теорії, які визначили суть інформаційного суспільства та його відмінність від попереднього суспільного устрою. Зокрема, зазначено, що інформація та знання в умовах глобалізації перетворюються на найважливіші засоби, за допомогою яких здійснюється комунікація в сучасному суспільстві. Процеси глобалізації стали причиною зародження глобального інформаційного середовища, яке характеризується інтеграцією інформаційних систем у єдину світову економіку.
Actuality. Cosmogeological phenomena and the rapid development of scientific and technical progress cause the next bifurcation of the world civilization and require a transition to a qualitatively different state of society. This is manifested in the increase of chaos and entropy and by all accounts is a systematic, multidimensional, planetary crisis of industrialism, which poses a threat to human existence. The output of forcing state and the transition to order is possible under condition of selection of the relevant attractors, which are based on socially significant ideas. Purpose and methods. The article aims at disclosing the essence of the phenomenon of ideas as the driving force in the management of the livelihoods of the society. Methodological basis of research is the dialectical principle of cognition, systemic, historical, cognitive, and situational approaches to the study of social phenomena, fundamental principles of the theory of ideology and control. Results. The essence of the spiritual power' ideas, is able to penetrate deep into the human mind and influence on society. The influence of the most important ideas on the fate in individual countries and peoples. It is shown that the idea of "live" appear and disappear and in some circumstances can recover his strength. Substantiates necessity in fresh ideas which touch: roles of the state and market; relations between an individual, society and state; correlation of morality and economic efficiency, production and consumption; to democraticness of globalization, that in ideas, which would come forward as an alternative of neoliberalizm which has already exhausted the vital resource. Conclusions and discussion. The scientific novelty of the obtained results consists in deepening of essence understanding, role, value of ideas and their administrative function; in the theoretical analysis of life cycle in ideas and demand determination on new ideas which are able to provide overcoming a system crisis and subsequent development of society. The ...
The article is devoted to the study of the process of the emergence of rights in the primitive society of the period of savagery and barbarism. The time frame expands from the beginning of the birth of life (about 4.1 – 3.7 billion years ago) to the invention of methods of cultivation of land and the primary division of labor and the invention of ancient civilization of Sumerians of writing (respectively 6,500 years - 3,100 years BC). The social and anthropological reasons for the emergence of law (needs of common habitation, normative consciousness), the world-view basis, the nature of the binding character of the original rules, their interrelation with morality, are substantiated. The original rules of conduct in the form of prohibitions (taboos), custom, rite, worship and ritual were alloy, a mixture of divine and natural, magical and psychological. These mono norms formed the core of primitive law as the form of proper, necessary behavior, the most significant factor of the force of which was the joint residence and the mutual benefit of acting concertedly.In the absence of political power in the primitive society, they also supported the authority of tribal leaders, elders, healers, healers and sorcerers. With the emergence of religion and systems of morality, these norms receive a new religious and value justification and differentiate from those norms of morality that do not require more stringent, compared with them, sanctions. Thus, the social interaction in the process of living together and the elaboration of the rules of this residence, the improvement of the methods of resolving conflicts and disputes provided the ground on which the archaic right of the primitive society has grown, which in the form reached us in the relevant earliest historical sources, according to the constant scientific tradition, is called customary law.Article received 20.11.2018 ; Статтю присвячено дослідженню процесу виникнення права у первісному суспільстві періоду дикості і варварства у часових рамках історії людства з початку зародження життя (близько 4,1 – 3,7 млрд рр. тому) до винайдення методів обробітку землі та первинного поділу праці та винайдення давньою цивілізацією шумерів письма (відповідно 6500–3100 рр. до н. е.). Обґрунтовано соціальні й антропологічні причини виникнення права (потреби спільного проживання, нормативність свідомості), світоглядна основа, природа зобов'язувального характеру первісних правил, їхній взаємозв'язок із мораллю.Матеріал надійшов 20.11.2018
The article is devoted to the study of the process of the emergence of rights in the primitive society of the period of savagery and barbarism. The time frame expands from the beginning of the birth of life (about 4.1 – 3.7 billion years ago) to the invention of methods of cultivation of land and the primary division of labor and the invention of ancient civilization of Sumerians of writing (respectively 6,500 years - 3,100 years BC). The social and anthropological reasons for the emergence of law (needs of common habitation, normative consciousness), the world-view basis, the nature of the binding character of the original rules, their interrelation with morality, are substantiated. The original rules of conduct in the form of prohibitions (taboos), custom, rite, worship and ritual were alloy, a mixture of divine and natural, magical and psychological. These mono norms formed the core of primitive law as the form of proper, necessary behavior, the most significant factor of the force of which was the joint residence and the mutual benefit of acting concertedly.In the absence of political power in the primitive society, they also supported the authority of tribal leaders, elders, healers, healers and sorcerers. With the emergence of religion and systems of morality, these norms receive a new religious and value justification and differentiate from those norms of morality that do not require more stringent, compared with them, sanctions. Thus, the social interaction in the process of living together and the elaboration of the rules of this residence, the improvement of the methods of resolving conflicts and disputes provided the ground on which the archaic right of the primitive society has grown, which in the form reached us in the relevant earliest historical sources, according to the constant scientific tradition, is called customary law.Article received 20.11.2018 ; Статтю присвячено дослідженню процесу виникнення права у первісному суспільстві періоду дикості і варварства у часових рамках історії людства з початку зародження життя (близько 4,1 – 3,7 млрд рр. тому) до винайдення методів обробітку землі та первинного поділу праці та винайдення давньою цивілізацією шумерів письма (відповідно 6500–3100 рр. до н. е.). Обґрунтовано соціальні й антропологічні причини виникнення права (потреби спільного проживання, нормативність свідомості), світоглядна основа, природа зобов'язувального характеру первісних правил, їхній взаємозв'язок із мораллю.Матеріал надійшов 20.11.2018
The article is devoted to the study of the process of the emergence of rights in the primitive society of the period of savagery and barbarism. The time frame expands from the beginning of the birth of life (about 4.1 – 3.7 billion years ago) to the invention of methods of cultivation of land and the primary division of labor and the invention of ancient civilization of Sumerians of writing (respectively 6,500 years - 3,100 years BC). The social and anthropological reasons for the emergence of law (needs of common habitation, normative consciousness), the world-view basis, the nature of the binding character of the original rules, their interrelation with morality, are substantiated. The original rules of conduct in the form of prohibitions (taboos), custom, rite, worship and ritual were alloy, a mixture of divine and natural, magical and psychological. These mono norms formed the core of primitive law as the form of proper, necessary behavior, the most significant factor of the force of which was the joint residence and the mutual benefit of acting concertedly.In the absence of political power in the primitive society, they also supported the authority of tribal leaders, elders, healers, healers and sorcerers. With the emergence of religion and systems of morality, these norms receive a new religious and value justification and differentiate from those norms of morality that do not require more stringent, compared with them, sanctions. Thus, the social interaction in the process of living together and the elaboration of the rules of this residence, the improvement of the methods of resolving conflicts and disputes provided the ground on which the archaic right of the primitive society has grown, which in the form reached us in the relevant earliest historical sources, according to the constant scientific tradition, is called customary law.Article received 20.11.2018 ; Статтю присвячено дослідженню процесу виникнення права у первісному суспільстві періоду дикості і варварства у часових рамках історії людства з початку зародження життя (близько 4,1 – 3,7 млрд рр. тому) до винайдення методів обробітку землі та первинного поділу праці та винайдення давньою цивілізацією шумерів письма (відповідно 6500–3100 рр. до н. е.). Обґрунтовано соціальні й антропологічні причини виникнення права (потреби спільного проживання, нормативність свідомості), світоглядна основа, природа зобов'язувального характеру первісних правил, їхній взаємозв'язок із мораллю.Матеріал надійшов 20.11.2018
Problem setting. The radicalization of society is possible in countries with different political regimes. Finding out the reasons leading to the processes of radicalization is the first step in developing programs for counter-radicalization and de-radicalization. Recent research and publications analysis. Various approaches to defining radicalization, its types and models have been studied. The understanding of radicalization as a process is noted. Methodological approaches to the modelling of radicalization are considered. Various ideas of scientists about the reasons, nature, characteristics of radicalization are investigated. Attention is drawn to the study of the mechanisms of involvement in the process of radicalization. The importance of the functional and descriptive definition of radicalization, such types of radicalization as the radicalization of thoughts and the radicalization of actions (K. McCauley, S. Moskalenko) is noted. The author agrees to the conclusion of A. P. Schmid about the possibility of radicalization of both non-state actors and state ones. There is a growing interest of scientists in the problem of radicalization in the digital era. It is indicated that the goal of many studies is to develop recommendations for the prevention of radicalization (counter-radicalization) and deradicalization. Paper objective. Study of the causes of radicalization of society in countries with different political regimes. Paper main body. Possible reasons for the radicalization of society are considered. It is noted that sometimes the assumption of the authorities regarding the real reasons for the radicalization of society can be erroneous. The author notes the difficulty of identifying the causes of radicalization under an authoritarian regime due to the lack of feedback from society and government. The importance of empirical research on the radicalization of society is pointed out. Specific examples of radicalization are given, confirming the existence of cause-and-effect relationships in political ...
The article examines the theoretical and conceptual aspect of the models of interaction between civil and political society. The purpose of this article is to analyze the scientific studies of the political dimension of civil society and to identify models of interaction between civil and political society in the concepts of representatives of political science from nineteenth to twenty-first centuries.To analyze the political dimension of civil society have been used mainly works of S.Peregudov, Y. Zhilin, I. Kravchenko, A. Butenko, O. Mironov, I. Yarulin.The works of A. de Tocqueville, A. Gramsci, L. Althusser, J. Cohen and E. Arato have been used to distinguish contemporary models of interaction between civil society and political society.In the course of the conducted research it was established that for quite a long period of time civil society was treated as a special non-state sphere of public life, an alternative to the state system of government. However, a growing number of scholars are beginning to focus on the political phenomenon of civil society.From the nineteenth century more and more scholars are paying attention to the need for a separation of the concept of «political society» and models of its interaction with civil society.The theoretical and conceptual analysis of the interaction between civil society and political society makes it possible to distinguish several classifications of models of their interaction.Within the chronological aspect and cultural and historical traditions, French (A. de Tocqueville, L. Althusser), Italian (A. Gramsci) and American (J. Cohen and E. Arato) models of interaction between civil and political society are distinguished.In the quantitative aspect, we can distinguish between three-membered (A. Gramsci, A. de Tocqueville, L. Althusser) and five-membered (J. Cohen and E. Arato) interaction models.Finally, when we focusing on the coexistence criterion, a third classification of interaction models should be highlighted: – the model of interaction in which political society mediates between the state and civil society (J. Cohen and E. Arato); – the model of interaction in which political society actually identifies with the state (A. de Tocqueville, A. Gramsci, L. Althusser). ; У статті розглядається теоретико-концептуальний аспект моделей взаємодії громадянського та політичного суспільства. Метою даної статті виступає аналіз наукових досліджень політичного виміру громадянського суспільства та виокремлення моделей взаємодії громадянського та політичного суспільства в концепціях представників політичної науки ХІХ-ХХІ ст.Для аналізу політичного виміру громадянського суспільства використані, головним чином, праці С.П.Перегудова, Ю.Жіліна, І.І.Кравченко, А.П.Бутенко, О.В.Міронова, І.Ф.Яруліна. Для виокремлення сучасних моделей взаємодії громадянського суспільства та політичного суспільства використовувалися праці А. де Токвіля, А.Грамші, Л. Альтюсера, Дж. Коена та Е. Арато.В ході проведеного дослідження встановлено, що досить тривалий період часу громадянське суспільство трактувалося як особлива позадержавна сфера суспільного життя, альтернатива державній системі управляння. Однак, поступово все більша кількість науковців розпочинає акцентувати увагу на питанні політичного феномену громадянського суспільства.Розпочинаю з ХІХ ст. все більше уваги науковців приділяється питанню необхідності окремого виділення поняття «політичного суспільства» та моделей його взаємодії з громадянським суспільством.Здійснений теоретико-концептуальний аналіз взаємодії громадянського суспільства та політичного суспільства дозволяє виділити кілька класифікацій моделей їхньої взаємодії.В рамках хронологічного аспекту та культурно-історичних традицій розрізняють: французьку (А.де Токвіль, Л.Альтюсер), італійську (А.Грамші) та американську (Дж. Коен та Е. Арато) моделі взаємодії громадянського та політичного суспільства.При виділенні кількісного аспекту ми можемо розрізняти трьохчленну (А. Грамші, А. де Токвіль, Л. Альтюсер) та п'ятичленну (Дж. Коен та Е. Арато) моделі взаємодії.І нарешті, при акцентуванні уваги на критерію співіснування, варто виділити третю класифікацію моделей взаємодії: модель взаємодії за якої політичне суспільство виступає посередником між державою та громадянським суспільством (Дж. Коен та Е. Арато); модель взаємодії за якої політичне суспільство фактично ототожнюється з державою (А. де Токвіль, А.Грамші, Л. Альтюсер).
The article examines the theoretical and conceptual aspect of the models of interaction between civil and political society. The purpose of this article is to analyze the scientific studies of the political dimension of civil society and to identify models of interaction between civil and political society in the concepts of representatives of political science from nineteenth to twenty-first centuries.To analyze the political dimension of civil society have been used mainly works of S.Peregudov, Y. Zhilin, I. Kravchenko, A. Butenko, O. Mironov, I. Yarulin.The works of A. de Tocqueville, A. Gramsci, L. Althusser, J. Cohen and E. Arato have been used to distinguish contemporary models of interaction between civil society and political society.In the course of the conducted research it was established that for quite a long period of time civil society was treated as a special non-state sphere of public life, an alternative to the state system of government. However, a growing number of scholars are beginning to focus on the political phenomenon of civil society.From the nineteenth century more and more scholars are paying attention to the need for a separation of the concept of «political society» and models of its interaction with civil society.The theoretical and conceptual analysis of the interaction between civil society and political society makes it possible to distinguish several classifications of models of their interaction.Within the chronological aspect and cultural and historical traditions, French (A. de Tocqueville, L. Althusser), Italian (A. Gramsci) and American (J. Cohen and E. Arato) models of interaction between civil and political society are distinguished.In the quantitative aspect, we can distinguish between three-membered (A. Gramsci, A. de Tocqueville, L. Althusser) and five-membered (J. Cohen and E. Arato) interaction models.Finally, when we focusing on the coexistence criterion, a third classification of interaction models should be highlighted: – the model of interaction in which political society mediates between the state and civil society (J. Cohen and E. Arato); – the model of interaction in which political society actually identifies with the state (A. de Tocqueville, A. Gramsci, L. Althusser). ; У статті розглядається теоретико-концептуальний аспект моделей взаємодії громадянського та політичного суспільства. Метою даної статті виступає аналіз наукових досліджень політичного виміру громадянського суспільства та виокремлення моделей взаємодії громадянського та політичного суспільства в концепціях представників політичної науки ХІХ-ХХІ ст.Для аналізу політичного виміру громадянського суспільства використані, головним чином, праці С.П.Перегудова, Ю.Жіліна, І.І.Кравченко, А.П.Бутенко, О.В.Міронова, І.Ф.Яруліна. Для виокремлення сучасних моделей взаємодії громадянського суспільства та політичного суспільства використовувалися праці А. де Токвіля, А.Грамші, Л. Альтюсера, Дж. Коена та Е. Арато.В ході проведеного дослідження встановлено, що досить тривалий період часу громадянське суспільство трактувалося як особлива позадержавна сфера суспільного життя, альтернатива державній системі управляння. Однак, поступово все більша кількість науковців розпочинає акцентувати увагу на питанні політичного феномену громадянського суспільства.Розпочинаю з ХІХ ст. все більше уваги науковців приділяється питанню необхідності окремого виділення поняття «політичного суспільства» та моделей його взаємодії з громадянським суспільством.Здійснений теоретико-концептуальний аналіз взаємодії громадянського суспільства та політичного суспільства дозволяє виділити кілька класифікацій моделей їхньої взаємодії.В рамках хронологічного аспекту та культурно-історичних традицій розрізняють: французьку (А.де Токвіль, Л.Альтюсер), італійську (А.Грамші) та американську (Дж. Коен та Е. Арато) моделі взаємодії громадянського та політичного суспільства.При виділенні кількісного аспекту ми можемо розрізняти трьохчленну (А. Грамші, А. де Токвіль, Л. Альтюсер) та п'ятичленну (Дж. Коен та Е. Арато) моделі взаємодії.І нарешті, при акцентуванні уваги на критерію співіснування, варто виділити третю класифікацію моделей взаємодії: модель взаємодії за якої політичне суспільство виступає посередником між державою та громадянським суспільством (Дж. Коен та Е. Арато); модель взаємодії за якої політичне суспільство фактично ототожнюється з державою (А. де Токвіль, А.Грамші, Л. Альтюсер).
Some basic problems which are connected with the modern state of freedom realization as an inalienable attribute of democratic society are analysed. It is marked, that the freedom of any person appears as a result of his/her capacity for a reflection, making decision and determination of his/her own vital strategies in a globalized world. It is stressed that the essence of freedom is not only in realization of necessity, freedom is some active actions, overcoming of the state of passivity, inactivity, where the will of the person to gain freedom appears and various obstacles are overcome. It is underlined, that the burning question of present time is the question about the maintenance of freedom in technocratic society, where the problems of economy growth and ecological danger go out on a foreground in the conditions of crisis. It is marked, that the person is able to attain freedom, and, thus, to overcome alienation and appropriate his/her own products of vital activity only in a society, in the public process of production, when the personal and public interests of participants of joint activity gather, and the freedom of the person is determined by the degree of freedom of other people.
