Suchergebnisse

From a historical perspective, it is important to note that Australia's foreign policy, as an autonomous and independent from the United Kingdom, began to take shape quite late. It was the Second World War when the weakening Great Britain remained unable to maintain the colonial government in many of its colonies and overseas territories. Australia used this situation to seek closer relations with the United States. Since the formation of the country's foreign policy beginning in Australia's foreign policy a U.S made the major impact. It is emphasized that Australia's foreign policy not only could not be seen without the U.S., but the country would mean the loss of Australia's main strategic partner and key defensive capacity. On the other hand, the U.S. is actively engaged, Australia to turn their satellite. De facto this country can be called the ambassador of the U.S. in Southeast Asia and Oceania. While Australia can be considered one of the region's leaders, however, Australia is a country characterized by an inferiority complex. This circumstance complicates the spread of its influence in the region and aims to become a strong "Medium Power". Australia's interest in the region cannot be denied, however, has seen its capacity levels to those of the world, which not only does not affect the development of the country, and provide questionable benefits to the Australian policies. It is noted that Australia since the start of cooperation with the United States actively participates in all of the U.S. wars. So we can predict that the next step would be to complete the Australian military's entrance into the U.S. armed forces, then the transfer of powers to the foreign policy of the Washington administration. It should be noted that such a step in Canberra is likely if it would be a real threat. Australia, through its humble U.S. policy and at the same time to the region's power in Asia and Oceania, has recently faced with the Chinese ambition to become a regional hegemony. While in China this step seems perfectly logical, but for Canberra administration, this situation is worrying. For this reason, Australian and the U.S. administrations in the near future may become even more intense, and Canberra may seek greater U.S. military presence in increasing the number of its territory. Subject of research was selected - "Forreign Policy of Australia: Development and Pecularity". The paper presents the foreign policy development, analyzed the problems of foreign policy in the region and globally. The paper aims to reveal the Australian foreign policy in the region's stability and its development. Seen not only in the past and the present, but also reveals the possible scenarios for the region. Australia's foreign policy can be identified as having specific characteristics and thus stands apart from other large and medium-sized countries. Adapting to the current situation it is actively reconfiguring its ongoing foreign policy. Australia's foreign policy is still making its development, and this formation already takes more than 40 years. This unique phenomenon is unique to Australian politics. Revealed the importance of Australia's foreign policy is its desire to dominate the Southern Hemisphere, South Africa, and East Asia. It should be noted that the twenty-first century. Australia's foreign policy focuses on one region - South-East Asia. Party is important to maintain peace and stability in Southeast Asia, because the region is important for Australia of their economic potential, and energy resources.

From a historical perspective, it is important to note that Australia's foreign policy, as an autonomous and independent from the United Kingdom, began to take shape quite late. It was the Second World War when the weakening Great Britain remained unable to maintain the colonial government in many of its colonies and overseas territories. Australia used this situation to seek closer relations with the United States. Since the formation of the country's foreign policy beginning in Australia's foreign policy a U.S made the major impact. It is emphasized that Australia's foreign policy not only could not be seen without the U.S., but the country would mean the loss of Australia's main strategic partner and key defensive capacity. On the other hand, the U.S. is actively engaged, Australia to turn their satellite. De facto this country can be called the ambassador of the U.S. in Southeast Asia and Oceania. While Australia can be considered one of the region's leaders, however, Australia is a country characterized by an inferiority complex. This circumstance complicates the spread of its influence in the region and aims to become a strong "Medium Power". Australia's interest in the region cannot be denied, however, has seen its capacity levels to those of the world, which not only does not affect the development of the country, and provide questionable benefits to the Australian policies. It is noted that Australia since the start of cooperation with the United States actively participates in all of the U.S. wars. So we can predict that the next step would be to complete the Australian military's entrance into the U.S. armed forces, then the transfer of powers to the foreign policy of the Washington administration. It should be noted that such a step in Canberra is likely if it would be a real threat. Australia, through its humble U.S. policy and at the same time to the region's power in Asia and Oceania, has recently faced with the Chinese ambition to become a regional hegemony. While in China this step seems perfectly logical, but for Canberra administration, this situation is worrying. For this reason, Australian and the U.S. administrations in the near future may become even more intense, and Canberra may seek greater U.S. military presence in increasing the number of its territory. Subject of research was selected - "Forreign Policy of Australia: Development and Pecularity". The paper presents the foreign policy development, analyzed the problems of foreign policy in the region and globally. The paper aims to reveal the Australian foreign policy in the region's stability and its development. Seen not only in the past and the present, but also reveals the possible scenarios for the region. Australia's foreign policy can be identified as having specific characteristics and thus stands apart from other large and medium-sized countries. Adapting to the current situation it is actively reconfiguring its ongoing foreign policy. Australia's foreign policy is still making its development, and this formation already takes more than 40 years. This unique phenomenon is unique to Australian politics. Revealed the importance of Australia's foreign policy is its desire to dominate the Southern Hemisphere, South Africa, and East Asia. It should be noted that the twenty-first century. Australia's foreign policy focuses on one region - South-East Asia. Party is important to maintain peace and stability in Southeast Asia, because the region is important for Australia of their economic potential, and energy resources.

From a historical perspective, it is important to note that Australia's foreign policy, as an autonomous and independent from the United Kingdom, began to take shape quite late. It was the Second World War when the weakening Great Britain remained unable to maintain the colonial government in many of its colonies and overseas territories. Australia used this situation to seek closer relations with the United States. Since the formation of the country's foreign policy beginning in Australia's foreign policy a U.S made the major impact. It is emphasized that Australia's foreign policy not only could not be seen without the U.S., but the country would mean the loss of Australia's main strategic partner and key defensive capacity. On the other hand, the U.S. is actively engaged, Australia to turn their satellite. De facto this country can be called the ambassador of the U.S. in Southeast Asia and Oceania. While Australia can be considered one of the region's leaders, however, Australia is a country characterized by an inferiority complex. This circumstance complicates the spread of its influence in the region and aims to become a strong "Medium Power". Australia's interest in the region cannot be denied, however, has seen its capacity levels to those of the world, which not only does not affect the development of the country, and provide questionable benefits to the Australian policies. It is noted that Australia since the start of cooperation with the United States actively participates in all of the U.S. wars. So we can predict that the next step would be to complete the Australian military's entrance into the U.S. armed forces, then the transfer of powers to the foreign policy of the Washington administration. It should be noted that such a step in Canberra is likely if it would be a real threat. Australia, through its humble U.S. policy and at the same time to the region's power in Asia and Oceania, has recently faced with the Chinese ambition to become a regional hegemony. While in China this step seems perfectly logical, but for Canberra administration, this situation is worrying. For this reason, Australian and the U.S. administrations in the near future may become even more intense, and Canberra may seek greater U.S. military presence in increasing the number of its territory. Subject of research was selected - "Forreign Policy of Australia: Development and Pecularity". The paper presents the foreign policy development, analyzed the problems of foreign policy in the region and globally. The paper aims to reveal the Australian foreign policy in the region's stability and its development. Seen not only in the past and the present, but also reveals the possible scenarios for the region. Australia's foreign policy can be identified as having specific characteristics and thus stands apart from other large and medium-sized countries. Adapting to the current situation it is actively reconfiguring its ongoing foreign policy. Australia's foreign policy is still making its development, and this formation already takes more than 40 years. This unique phenomenon is unique to Australian politics. Revealed the importance of Australia's foreign policy is its desire to dominate the Southern Hemisphere, South Africa, and East Asia. It should be noted that the twenty-first century. Australia's foreign policy focuses on one region - South-East Asia. Party is important to maintain peace and stability in Southeast Asia, because the region is important for Australia of their economic potential, and energy resources.

Japan's Maritime Territorial Disputes and Resolution Strategies The South East Asia-Pacific region is often associated with the greatest threat, where large-scale military conflict could arise. The main threat arises from the growing economic power of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as China) and, in parallel, the processes of remilitarization of Japan. However, the positions of other states also pose a threat to the security of the region: Š. The Korea-South Korea conflict, the territorial disputes between Vietnam and China, and so on. At the heart of the disputes in the region are maritime territorial conflicts, which have arisen in the Asia-Pacific region since the end of the Second World War. The cross-border territorial conflicts in the region are characterized by the fact that the vast majority of them are of a maritime rather than a continental nature.China's growing power is pushing Japan's ruling elite to change the foreign policy they followed in the twentieth century. Focus on economic development, with confidence and on the basis of security guarantees provided by the United States. The country's economic stagnation in recent years has also allowed Japan to pursue a more active and stronger nationalist foreign policy. Japan's main foreign policy issues are related to its territorial conflicts. Japan has territorial disputes with more than one country, they have been going on for more than a decade and are therefore extremely complex and complex and difficult to resolve. This is due to several factors: 1) Japan's territorial conflicts with other countries in the region date back to the 19th century. – 20th century's legacy of imperial expansion which, unlike Germany after World War II, failed to abandon. 2) Growing nationalism in Japan and other societies and politicians in Southeast Asia and the Pacific contributes to the escalation and escalation of territorial conflicts. 3) Complex history of Southeast Asian countries in the 19th - 20th centuries. Lack of historical meeting between the countries of the region. 4) The growth of Chinese power and the pursuit of recovery in the 19th - 20th centuries. lost territories have failed. 5) Maritime territorial specificity compared to continental areas: economic benefits, security and strategic advantage.

Japan's Maritime Territorial Disputes and Resolution Strategies The South East Asia-Pacific region is often associated with the greatest threat, where large-scale military conflict could arise. The main threat arises from the growing economic power of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as China) and, in parallel, the processes of remilitarization of Japan. However, the positions of other states also pose a threat to the security of the region: Š. The Korea-South Korea conflict, the territorial disputes between Vietnam and China, and so on. At the heart of the disputes in the region are maritime territorial conflicts, which have arisen in the Asia-Pacific region since the end of the Second World War. The cross-border territorial conflicts in the region are characterized by the fact that the vast majority of them are of a maritime rather than a continental nature.China's growing power is pushing Japan's ruling elite to change the foreign policy they followed in the twentieth century. Focus on economic development, with confidence and on the basis of security guarantees provided by the United States. The country's economic stagnation in recent years has also allowed Japan to pursue a more active and stronger nationalist foreign policy. Japan's main foreign policy issues are related to its territorial conflicts. Japan has territorial disputes with more than one country, they have been going on for more than a decade and are therefore extremely complex and complex and difficult to resolve. This is due to several factors: 1) Japan's territorial conflicts with other countries in the region date back to the 19th century. – 20th century's legacy of imperial expansion which, unlike Germany after World War II, failed to abandon. 2) Growing nationalism in Japan and other societies and politicians in Southeast Asia and the Pacific contributes to the escalation and escalation of territorial conflicts. 3) Complex history of Southeast Asian countries in the 19th - 20th centuries. Lack of historical meeting between the countries of the region. 4) The growth of Chinese power and the pursuit of recovery in the 19th - 20th centuries. lost territories have failed. 5) Maritime territorial specificity compared to continental areas: economic benefits, security and strategic advantage.

Japan's Maritime Territorial Disputes and Resolution Strategies The South East Asia-Pacific region is often associated with the greatest threat, where large-scale military conflict could arise. The main threat arises from the growing economic power of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as China) and, in parallel, the processes of remilitarization of Japan. However, the positions of other states also pose a threat to the security of the region: Š. The Korea-South Korea conflict, the territorial disputes between Vietnam and China, and so on. At the heart of the disputes in the region are maritime territorial conflicts, which have arisen in the Asia-Pacific region since the end of the Second World War. The cross-border territorial conflicts in the region are characterized by the fact that the vast majority of them are of a maritime rather than a continental nature.China's growing power is pushing Japan's ruling elite to change the foreign policy they followed in the twentieth century. Focus on economic development, with confidence and on the basis of security guarantees provided by the United States. The country's economic stagnation in recent years has also allowed Japan to pursue a more active and stronger nationalist foreign policy. Japan's main foreign policy issues are related to its territorial conflicts. Japan has territorial disputes with more than one country, they have been going on for more than a decade and are therefore extremely complex and complex and difficult to resolve. This is due to several factors: 1) Japan's territorial conflicts with other countries in the region date back to the 19th century. – 20th century's legacy of imperial expansion which, unlike Germany after World War II, failed to abandon. 2) Growing nationalism in Japan and other societies and politicians in Southeast Asia and the Pacific contributes to the escalation and escalation of territorial conflicts. 3) Complex history of Southeast Asian countries in the 19th - 20th centuries. Lack of historical meeting between the countries of the region. 4) The growth of Chinese power and the pursuit of recovery in the 19th - 20th centuries. lost territories have failed. 5) Maritime territorial specificity compared to continental areas: economic benefits, security and strategic advantage.

Japan's Maritime Territorial Disputes and Resolution Strategies The South East Asia-Pacific region is often associated with the greatest threat, where large-scale military conflict could arise. The main threat arises from the growing economic power of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as China) and, in parallel, the processes of remilitarization of Japan. However, the positions of other states also pose a threat to the security of the region: Š. The Korea-South Korea conflict, the territorial disputes between Vietnam and China, and so on. At the heart of the disputes in the region are maritime territorial conflicts, which have arisen in the Asia-Pacific region since the end of the Second World War. The cross-border territorial conflicts in the region are characterized by the fact that the vast majority of them are of a maritime rather than a continental nature.China's growing power is pushing Japan's ruling elite to change the foreign policy they followed in the twentieth century. Focus on economic development, with confidence and on the basis of security guarantees provided by the United States. The country's economic stagnation in recent years has also allowed Japan to pursue a more active and stronger nationalist foreign policy. Japan's main foreign policy issues are related to its territorial conflicts. Japan has territorial disputes with more than one country, they have been going on for more than a decade and are therefore extremely complex and complex and difficult to resolve. This is due to several factors: 1) Japan's territorial conflicts with other countries in the region date back to the 19th century. – 20th century's legacy of imperial expansion which, unlike Germany after World War II, failed to abandon. 2) Growing nationalism in Japan and other societies and politicians in Southeast Asia and the Pacific contributes to the escalation and escalation of territorial conflicts. 3) Complex history of Southeast Asian countries in the 19th - 20th centuries. Lack of historical meeting between the countries of the region. 4) The growth of Chinese power and the pursuit of recovery in the 19th - 20th centuries. lost territories have failed. 5) Maritime territorial specificity compared to continental areas: economic benefits, security and strategic advantage.

"the father of Albanian nation", who established Albanian inde- pendence on November 28th, 1443. After falling down under Ottoman sway in 1479, the Albanians had to wait till November 28, 1912 when the Albania's independence was re-announced. Nevertheless, when Albanian sate borders were drawn in 1913 by the Great European Powers, nearly half of ethnic Al- banians were left out-side-most notably in the Serbia's province of Kosovo and Metochia and western Macedonia. It was a result of clashes of opposite interests of both Great European Powers and Balkan national states in regard to strategically very significant land of Albania. Every powerful European state at the end of the 19th century and the begin- ning of the 20th century was interested in the Southeastern Europe. Territory of Albania became a part of this interest. Russia's crucial driving force in her Balkan policy was the wish to acquire an exit to the "warm sea". Germany of the Second Empire saw the territory of the Southeastern Europe as the trans- versal area for its Drang nach Osten towards the Middle East and Central Asia. Austria-Hungary was seeking to occupy the seaport of Salonica and to establish its footholds on the territory of Albania. While Italy did not show great interest concerning the question of Salonica, its foreign policy in regard to Albanian territory became the main obstacle for Viennese plans about the "land of Skanderbeg". Similarly to the Great Britain's policy of European po- wer-balance, France was pursuing the policy of status quo on the Balkans.