Suchergebnisse

Reprinted as: Monthly Review pamphlet series no.12, Monthly Review press: 25c.

During the Suez crisis, the New York Times carried several reports from GB & France which purported to show how the pop's of those countries backed their gov in their stand on the Nasser problem. In comparing these reports with survey results, it was found that they described a French unanimity which did not exist & implied that the British gov enjoyed a degree of support it did not have. AA.

Because of its predominant importance this article in the series "Problems of Australian Foreign Policy" deals exclusively with the Suez crisis; other aspects of Australian foreign policy will be brought up to date in the next number of the Journal.

Professor Herman Finer, author of fourteen books on world politics, and political institutions and philosophy, has now written a morality tale abounding with italics, capital letters, and searing words. The burden of his tale is this: In July 1956, John Foster Dulles thoughtlessly provoked a ruthless dictator into nationalizing the Universal Suez Canal Company which controls the lifeline of the West. Then Dulles compounded his sins. He failed to support our closest Western allies by holding the rest of the world at bay while our friends rightfully resorted to force against a Nasser who had rejected an international management board for the Canal.