Suchergebnisse

Imprint varies. ; Other title on verso of cover given in romanized form: Molod ukraina. ; Title romanized. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Publication statement also given in English: Alliance of Ukrainian Canadian Democratic Youth, list. 1951- ; Central Committee of the Ukrainian Canadian Youth Association-ODUM, - .

I den omfattande volymen Krigen i Ukraina har nitton norska experter bidragit med analyser med utgångspunkt i sina respektive områden. Boken består i fyra delar, där den första delen avhandlar »Krigens rammebetingelser», den andra »Russlands krig», den tredje »Europa och transatlantisk samhold», samt slutligen »Forsvaret av Norge».
In the extensive volume The War in Ukraine (Krigen i Ukraina), nineteen Norwegian experts have contributed with analyses from their respective fields. The book consists of four parts, the first of which deals with 'the framework conditions of the war'; the second part concerns 'Russia's war'; the third, 'Europe and transatlantic unity'; and finally the fourth, 'Norway's defense'.

von George Cleinow ; Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- H.un.app. 80 p-10/11

There are three main geopolitical actors whose interests & specific actions may have impact on Ukraine's geopolitical drift towards the East or the West. From such actors Russia must be named first. Yet author of the article is more interested in two others -- the United States & the European Union. Although in the Huntington's scheme they represent supposedly united Western civilization their interests in Ukraine or towards Ukraine are rather different. For the United States Ukraine is quite an important country, especially for security reasons. Those reasons are related both to containment of Russia -- the USA seeks to contain not only enemies but partners as well -- and to the implementation of national security strategy which treats the Wider Middle East as likely the most important for the USA -- from security point of view -- region of the world. Ukraine borders with this region in which the USA has few reliable partners. Ukraine may became such a partner -- more reliable than Turkey. From the first view the EU is more close to Ukraine than the USA. Yet the EU is more close to Ukraine only from geographical point of view. The EU, especially its core states, so called "old" Europe, treats Ukraine as peripheral country & regards development of closer ties with it as unnecessary or even harmful. One of the many reasons -- Ukraine may become a new Trojan Horse of the USA inside the EU. Different EU countries look at EU neighborhood policy with different eyes. Most of the new members of the EU give priority to the eastern direction but many older -- rather to the southern one. Moreover, for most of the new members Ukraine is more natural candidate for EU membership than Turkey creating much less problems for the European identity of the EU. However, Ukraine's possible accession to EU & NATO will depend not only upon position of the major geopolitical players but on the will of Ukrainians themselves. Ukraine is extremely heterogeneous country. Religious, historical & cultural divides create political ones & at the moment it is not clear which way -- leading towards the East or the West -- the country may choose. In such situation an external encouragement & support is vitally needed -- development of relations with Ukraine must become a priority not only for the USA but for the EU also. Adapted from the source document.