Suchergebnisse

The institute of employee's disciplinary liability is one of the most significant institutes in Labour Law. The legal rules of this institute are intended not only to ensure the right of the employer, as the owner of his property, to ownership, but also to protect the employees from unjustified and illegal application of disciplinary liability. Since the United Kingdom has a long experience of regulating employment relationship, in the Article the legal regulation of employees' disciplinary liability in Lithuania is being compared with that country. The Article analyses the sources of labour law regulating this institute, in Lithuania and in the United Kingdom, the basis for disciplinary liability, the procedure of imposing disciplinary sanctions, the appeal of imposed disciplinary sanctions and bodies, resolving disputes arisen from these matters. This Article is based not only on the comparative analysis of the legal rules determined in the acts of these countries, but also on the practice of the courts and the material of labour law specialists concerning the disciplinary liability are scrutinized. The comparative analysis of the acts, regulating employees' disciplinary liability in Lithuania and in the United Kingdom, shows material differences of the legal regulation in both countries, detects certain flaws in the regulation and there are improvements of these flaws proposed in this Article.

The institute of employee's disciplinary liability is one of the most significant institutes in Labour Law. The legal rules of this institute are intended not only to ensure the right of the employer, as the owner of his property, to ownership, but also to protect the employees from unjustified and illegal application of disciplinary liability. Since the United Kingdom has a long experience of regulating employment relationship, in the Article the legal regulation of employees' disciplinary liability in Lithuania is being compared with that country. The Article analyses the sources of labour law regulating this institute, in Lithuania and in the United Kingdom, the basis for disciplinary liability, the procedure of imposing disciplinary sanctions, the appeal of imposed disciplinary sanctions and bodies, resolving disputes arisen from these matters. This Article is based not only on the comparative analysis of the legal rules determined in the acts of these countries, but also on the practice of the courts and the material of labour law specialists concerning the disciplinary liability are scrutinized. The comparative analysis of the acts, regulating employees' disciplinary liability in Lithuania and in the United Kingdom, shows material differences of the legal regulation in both countries, detects certain flaws in the regulation and there are improvements of these flaws proposed in this Article.

The institute of employee's disciplinary liability is one of the most significant institutes in Labour Law. The legal rules of this institute are intended not only to ensure the right of the employer, as the owner of his property, to ownership, but also to protect the employees from unjustified and illegal application of disciplinary liability. Since the United Kingdom has a long experience of regulating employment relationship, in the Article the legal regulation of employees' disciplinary liability in Lithuania is being compared with that country. The Article analyses the sources of labour law regulating this institute, in Lithuania and in the United Kingdom, the basis for disciplinary liability, the procedure of imposing disciplinary sanctions, the appeal of imposed disciplinary sanctions and bodies, resolving disputes arisen from these matters. This Article is based not only on the comparative analysis of the legal rules determined in the acts of these countries, but also on the practice of the courts and the material of labour law specialists concerning the disciplinary liability are scrutinized. The comparative analysis of the acts, regulating employees' disciplinary liability in Lithuania and in the United Kingdom, shows material differences of the legal regulation in both countries, detects certain flaws in the regulation and there are improvements of these flaws proposed in this Article.

The object of this master thesis is public policy of the United Kingdom and Germany in domestic violence. The main goal of this research is to analyze the current situation of chosen countries and as well as to discover similarities and differences of methods for preventing violence in the United Kingdom and Germany and other EU states. The main task of my study is to identify how cultural factors impact the policy-making process in case of domestic violence. The usage of such methods as analysis of literature, legislation analysis, interview analysis, discourse analysis and comparative analysis led to a conclusion that domestic violence subject is a globally gender-based problem that touches each country. However, all states solve this problem in their own ways. Moreover, many countries don't even gather data regarding violent cases and don't take any legislation and methods for preventing domestic abuse. As well as many policies that were implemented in other countries, don't work due to many reasons. First, it happens because the governments don't take into consideration cultural factors that play a big role in the society, introducing a new legislation. As well as females keep silent about domestic violence in their families due to many reasons so that it`s impossible to gather accurate data that shows the size of the problem and it helps to take proper measures for combating domestic violence. The governments and authorities that are specialized on this subject should put this problem in the priority list and introduce a new legislation considering all factors that can hinder the policy`s success. For my thesis, I use resources and literature related to domestic violence problems on the territory of the United Kingdom and Germany that help me to identify similarities and differences that exist in methods for preventing domestic abuse. Moreover, I used official websites and studies related to domestic violence not only in the United Kingdom and Germany but also in other EU countries. I recommend my thesis for politicians and authorities that are specialized on domestic violence problem and for individuals who are interested in this subject.

The object of this master thesis is public policy of the United Kingdom and Germany in domestic violence. The main goal of this research is to analyze the current situation of chosen countries and as well as to discover similarities and differences of methods for preventing violence in the United Kingdom and Germany and other EU states. The main task of my study is to identify how cultural factors impact the policy-making process in case of domestic violence. The usage of such methods as analysis of literature, legislation analysis, interview analysis, discourse analysis and comparative analysis led to a conclusion that domestic violence subject is a globally gender-based problem that touches each country. However, all states solve this problem in their own ways. Moreover, many countries don't even gather data regarding violent cases and don't take any legislation and methods for preventing domestic abuse. As well as many policies that were implemented in other countries, don't work due to many reasons. First, it happens because the governments don't take into consideration cultural factors that play a big role in the society, introducing a new legislation. As well as females keep silent about domestic violence in their families due to many reasons so that it`s impossible to gather accurate data that shows the size of the problem and it helps to take proper measures for combating domestic violence. The governments and authorities that are specialized on this subject should put this problem in the priority list and introduce a new legislation considering all factors that can hinder the policy`s success. For my thesis, I use resources and literature related to domestic violence problems on the territory of the United Kingdom and Germany that help me to identify similarities and differences that exist in methods for preventing domestic abuse. Moreover, I used official websites and studies related to domestic violence not only in the United Kingdom and Germany but also in other EU countries. I recommend my thesis for politicians and authorities that are specialized on domestic violence problem and for individuals who are interested in this subject.

The main purpose of the thesis is to analyse what kind of legal impact was done due to Brexit and how did it overall affect the European Union Private International Law. The Chapter one presents the exceptional civil judicial cooperation between the United Kingdom and the European Union pre-Brexit. The Chapter two analyses the Great Repeal Bill and to what extent is private international law considered during the withdrawal negation process. The Chapter three provides future possibilities for the United Kingdom to maintain civil judicial cooperation with the European Union and discusses the conceivable outcome in case the United Kingdom will consider adapting other international legal documents when the European Union legislative system cease to apply.

The main purpose of the thesis is to analyse what kind of legal impact was done due to Brexit and how did it overall affect the European Union Private International Law. The Chapter one presents the exceptional civil judicial cooperation between the United Kingdom and the European Union pre-Brexit. The Chapter two analyses the Great Repeal Bill and to what extent is private international law considered during the withdrawal negation process. The Chapter three provides future possibilities for the United Kingdom to maintain civil judicial cooperation with the European Union and discusses the conceivable outcome in case the United Kingdom will consider adapting other international legal documents when the European Union legislative system cease to apply.

Problematic of Brexit in the Context of Company Law On June 23 of 2016 a referendum of British citizens expressed a support for the United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union. Despite the fact, this public decision was advisory, it paved the way further for United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union. The paper discusses the Court of Justice of the European Union assessment of the United Kingdom unilateral notice of withdrawal. As the formation of a state exit from the European Union is taking place for the first time, many legal issues have arisen, including alternative, 28th legal regime of company law and cross-border mergers between United Kingdom companies and European Union member states companies. This paper examines the theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers in the field of freedom of establishment in national, European and international regulation, taking into account the conditions applicable to reorganization and legislation invoked in European Union, United Kingdom and the Republic of Lithuania. Relevant cases brought before the United Kingdom Supreme Court help to understand how European Union law will be treated in the United Kingdom after Brexit transitional period if one of the parties of the merger or establishment is in a Member State of the European Union. The paper also discusses the 28th alternative legal regime of company law and its post-Brexit status. The aim is to explore the perspectives of the European Union-formed institutes - European Company (SE) and European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG) in the United Kingdom in the context of state exits. Thus, the paper reviews the prospects of Brexit in the context of cross-border mergers and the 28th alternative legal regime.

Problematic of Brexit in the Context of Company Law On June 23 of 2016 a referendum of British citizens expressed a support for the United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union. Despite the fact, this public decision was advisory, it paved the way further for United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union. The paper discusses the Court of Justice of the European Union assessment of the United Kingdom unilateral notice of withdrawal. As the formation of a state exit from the European Union is taking place for the first time, many legal issues have arisen, including alternative, 28th legal regime of company law and cross-border mergers between United Kingdom companies and European Union member states companies. This paper examines the theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers in the field of freedom of establishment in national, European and international regulation, taking into account the conditions applicable to reorganization and legislation invoked in European Union, United Kingdom and the Republic of Lithuania. Relevant cases brought before the United Kingdom Supreme Court help to understand how European Union law will be treated in the United Kingdom after Brexit transitional period if one of the parties of the merger or establishment is in a Member State of the European Union. The paper also discusses the 28th alternative legal regime of company law and its post-Brexit status. The aim is to explore the perspectives of the European Union-formed institutes - European Company (SE) and European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG) in the United Kingdom in the context of state exits. Thus, the paper reviews the prospects of Brexit in the context of cross-border mergers and the 28th alternative legal regime.

Problematic of Brexit in the Context of Company Law On June 23 of 2016 a referendum of British citizens expressed a support for the United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union. Despite the fact, this public decision was advisory, it paved the way further for United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union. The paper discusses the Court of Justice of the European Union assessment of the United Kingdom unilateral notice of withdrawal. As the formation of a state exit from the European Union is taking place for the first time, many legal issues have arisen, including alternative, 28th legal regime of company law and cross-border mergers between United Kingdom companies and European Union member states companies. This paper examines the theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers in the field of freedom of establishment in national, European and international regulation, taking into account the conditions applicable to reorganization and legislation invoked in European Union, United Kingdom and the Republic of Lithuania. Relevant cases brought before the United Kingdom Supreme Court help to understand how European Union law will be treated in the United Kingdom after Brexit transitional period if one of the parties of the merger or establishment is in a Member State of the European Union. The paper also discusses the 28th alternative legal regime of company law and its post-Brexit status. The aim is to explore the perspectives of the European Union-formed institutes - European Company (SE) and European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG) in the United Kingdom in the context of state exits. Thus, the paper reviews the prospects of Brexit in the context of cross-border mergers and the 28th alternative legal regime.

Problematic of Brexit in the Context of Company Law On June 23 of 2016 a referendum of British citizens expressed a support for the United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union. Despite the fact, this public decision was advisory, it paved the way further for United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union. The paper discusses the Court of Justice of the European Union assessment of the United Kingdom unilateral notice of withdrawal. As the formation of a state exit from the European Union is taking place for the first time, many legal issues have arisen, including alternative, 28th legal regime of company law and cross-border mergers between United Kingdom companies and European Union member states companies. This paper examines the theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers in the field of freedom of establishment in national, European and international regulation, taking into account the conditions applicable to reorganization and legislation invoked in European Union, United Kingdom and the Republic of Lithuania. Relevant cases brought before the United Kingdom Supreme Court help to understand how European Union law will be treated in the United Kingdom after Brexit transitional period if one of the parties of the merger or establishment is in a Member State of the European Union. The paper also discusses the 28th alternative legal regime of company law and its post-Brexit status. The aim is to explore the perspectives of the European Union-formed institutes - European Company (SE) and European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG) in the United Kingdom in the context of state exits. Thus, the paper reviews the prospects of Brexit in the context of cross-border mergers and the 28th alternative legal regime.

On 29th March 2017, the United Kingdom expressed its intention to leave the Union. In this way, Article 50 of the EU Treaty has been activated and the fate of millions of people and their families who have enjoyed the rights granted by the Union was in an uncertain situation. Therefore, Brexit negotiations sought a compromise on measures to ensure the rights of Union citizens residing in the United Kingdom and citizens of United Kingdom residing in the member states as well as their family members and on 29th to 30th of January 2020 a Withdrawal Agreement was ratified, which redefined the rights and status of international families. This master thesis aims to identify how and to what extend United Kingdoms withdrawal affects the rights and the status of members of international families. A study on the regulation of the withdrawal and the reasons behind Brexit has shown that Article 50 of the EU Treaty does not define on what specific rights must be agreed, but the United Kingdoms desire to end the free movement of persons determined that the content of the rights granted to international families had to be discussed separately. The work, therefore, examines the Union acquis on the movement of international families and distinguishes fundamental rights to be divided to two parts: substantive rights enabling international families to leave and enter, reside and remain, and procedural rights aimed to eliminate the effects resulting from the exercise of the movement rights. To determine what measures have been implemented a comparative analysis of Union acquis and Brexit regulations has been carried out. It has shown that the Withdrawal Agreement covers all excluded rights granted to international families, but their content varies at each stage of Brexit. The work also provides an analysis of the status of members of international families and stipulates that the legal status of international family members may change, depending on the model of the relationship to be applied at a particular stage of Brexit and the nationality of the family member as well as the place where rights are exercised. However, at any event, the Union and the United Kingdom are obliged to properly fulfil commitments arising from the withdrawal and ensure a consistent interpretation and implementation of adopted regulations.

On 29th March 2017, the United Kingdom expressed its intention to leave the Union. In this way, Article 50 of the EU Treaty has been activated and the fate of millions of people and their families who have enjoyed the rights granted by the Union was in an uncertain situation. Therefore, Brexit negotiations sought a compromise on measures to ensure the rights of Union citizens residing in the United Kingdom and citizens of United Kingdom residing in the member states as well as their family members and on 29th to 30th of January 2020 a Withdrawal Agreement was ratified, which redefined the rights and status of international families. This master thesis aims to identify how and to what extend United Kingdoms withdrawal affects the rights and the status of members of international families. A study on the regulation of the withdrawal and the reasons behind Brexit has shown that Article 50 of the EU Treaty does not define on what specific rights must be agreed, but the United Kingdoms desire to end the free movement of persons determined that the content of the rights granted to international families had to be discussed separately. The work, therefore, examines the Union acquis on the movement of international families and distinguishes fundamental rights to be divided to two parts: substantive rights enabling international families to leave and enter, reside and remain, and procedural rights aimed to eliminate the effects resulting from the exercise of the movement rights. To determine what measures have been implemented a comparative analysis of Union acquis and Brexit regulations has been carried out. It has shown that the Withdrawal Agreement covers all excluded rights granted to international families, but their content varies at each stage of Brexit. The work also provides an analysis of the status of members of international families and stipulates that the legal status of international family members may change, depending on the model of the relationship to be applied at a particular stage of Brexit and the nationality of the family member as well as the place where rights are exercised. However, at any event, the Union and the United Kingdom are obliged to properly fulfil commitments arising from the withdrawal and ensure a consistent interpretation and implementation of adopted regulations.

On 29th March 2017, the United Kingdom expressed its intention to leave the Union. In this way, Article 50 of the EU Treaty has been activated and the fate of millions of people and their families who have enjoyed the rights granted by the Union was in an uncertain situation. Therefore, Brexit negotiations sought a compromise on measures to ensure the rights of Union citizens residing in the United Kingdom and citizens of United Kingdom residing in the member states as well as their family members and on 29th to 30th of January 2020 a Withdrawal Agreement was ratified, which redefined the rights and status of international families. This master thesis aims to identify how and to what extend United Kingdoms withdrawal affects the rights and the status of members of international families. A study on the regulation of the withdrawal and the reasons behind Brexit has shown that Article 50 of the EU Treaty does not define on what specific rights must be agreed, but the United Kingdoms desire to end the free movement of persons determined that the content of the rights granted to international families had to be discussed separately. The work, therefore, examines the Union acquis on the movement of international families and distinguishes fundamental rights to be divided to two parts: substantive rights enabling international families to leave and enter, reside and remain, and procedural rights aimed to eliminate the effects resulting from the exercise of the movement rights. To determine what measures have been implemented a comparative analysis of Union acquis and Brexit regulations has been carried out. It has shown that the Withdrawal Agreement covers all excluded rights granted to international families, but their content varies at each stage of Brexit. The work also provides an analysis of the status of members of international families and stipulates that the legal status of international family members may change, depending on the model of the relationship to be applied at a particular stage of Brexit and the nationality of the family member as well as the place where rights are exercised. However, at any event, the Union and the United Kingdom are obliged to properly fulfil commitments arising from the withdrawal and ensure a consistent interpretation and implementation of adopted regulations.