Suchergebnisse

Показаны авангардный цивилизационный потенциал симбиоза человека и общества в контексте различных социально-экономических систем. Представлены решающие факторы эффективного, систематического и преемственного развития цивилизации. Это доминирующий в обществе характер мировоззренческой направленности, определяющий вектор наиболее востребованных индивидуальных и общественных усилий и формирующее его образование, информация, и законы морали, основанные на примате человеческого достоинства и духовной культуры.И вертикальная мобильность людей для интеграции их авангардного потенциала при уважении дифференциации достижений каждого, социально ориентированная рыночная экономика с ответственностью государства, обучающаяся экономика, и информационные системы реального времени. Таким образом, реализуется творческий авангардный потенциал синергии индивида и общества во всем спектре социально экономической деятельности людей. ; Рrovides avant-garde civilizational potential of thesymbiosis of human and society in the context of differentsocial and economic systems. Represented the decisive factorsfor the most efficient, systematic and successive developmentof civilization. It is the dominant character of worldviewdirection in the society defining vector of the most demandedindividual and community efforts in science, technology andsociety and shaping role of education and information systems;and of the legal principles of morality based on the primacy ofhuman dignity and spiritual culture over utilitarian interests.Furthermore, the systematic provision of vertical mobilityfor the universal integration of avant-garde potential of allindividuals including those with adverse initial conditionswhile guaranteed respect to the differentiation of the individualachievements. Also is implementing of socially oriented marketeconomy with legal regulatory and optimizing participationand responsibility of the state and government. And a learningeconomy, which is built into the structure of systematic andlifelong education of each individual synergistically integratedinto society. Finally is the universal access of academic,industrial, humanitarian and political professionals and thecivil society to the national and global information real-timesystems. To the greatest extent those principles correspondto innovative-industrial socio-economic model of society thatprovides scientific and technical knowledge, efficiency of realtimeinformation systems, and industrial and agriculturalproduction to ensure domestic supply of food, goods, servicesand knowledge through the universal employment of thepeople. There is every reason to define innovative-industrialsociety as a symbiosis of industrial production capabilitiesand innovative creativity of post-industrial economies in theone socio-economic system. Implementation of humanisticinnovative-industrial civilization requires domination ofthe world view, in which human dignity is the criterion, thepurpose and the source of prosperity. This is the realizationof the avant-garde potential of synergy of human and societyacross the all spectrum of socio-economic activities of humanbeing ; Показані авангардний цивілізаційний потенціалсимбіозу людини і суспільства в контексті різнихсоціально-економічних систем. Представлені вирішальнічинники ефективного, систематичного і спадкоємногорозвитку цивілізації. Це домінуючий в суспільствіхарактер світоглядної спрямованості, що визначаєвектор найбільш затребуваних індивідуальних ігромадських зусиль і формуюча його освіта, інформаціяі закони моралі, засновані на приматі людської гідностіі духовної культури. І вертикальна мобільність людейдля інтеграції їх авангардного потенціалу при повазідиференціації досягнень кожного, соціально орієнтованаринкова економіка з відповідальністю держави, навчаючаекономіка, і інформаційні системи реального часу. Такимчином, реалізується творчий авангардний потенціалсинергії індивіда і суспільства в усьому спектрі соціально-економічної діяльності людей.

The article is dedicated to the problems of ensuring the unity of multi-religious Russian society, the potential of positive experience of the multi-layer and poly-ethnic state, to the problems of ensuring an efficient state management. Religious Islamic organizations, religious leaders, national political and intellectual elites are considered from the point of mediation – as an intermediary in the provision of the state's and believers' interests in order to reach a consensus and resist the attempts of destabilization of domestic environment by extremist organizations that use radical, including religious, theories. ; Статья посвящена проблемам обеспечения единства многоконфессионального российского общества, потенциалу положительного опыта многоукладного и полиэтнического государства, проблемам обеспечения эффективности управления государством. Религиозные исламские организации, религиозные лидеры, национальная политическая и интеллектуальная элита рассматриваются с точки зрения медиации – как посредники в обеспечении интересов государства и верующих, достижении консенсуса и противостоянии попыткам дестабилизации внутренней среды со стороны крайних экстремистских группировок, использующих радикальные теории, в т.ч. и религиозные.

The currently being prepared for publication "Foreword" to F. Tönnies' work "Community and Society" was written by Harvard University professor P.A. Sorokin (1889–1968), who was a Russian/American sociologist. It was first published alongside the English translation of Tönnies' book, issued in New York back in 1940. According to P.A. Sorokin, Tönnies' community and society dichotomy represents a universal categorical description of two opposing forms of social organization. They appear in the social evolution of various civilizations and in the writings of their founders. P.A. Sorokin considered Tönnies to be one of the contemporary successors to the tradition of describing society in such a way. Tönnies' book was ahead of its time. It is mentioned in "Foreword" that the first German edition, published in 1887, did not attract readers' attention. However, when the 20th century came around — this book became a point of reference for German social scientists, as well as for educated individuals among the general public. "Foreword" mentions the reason for its rapid increase in popularity, which turned out to be a rapid and widespread transition from "community" to a "society" based on contractual relations. P.A. Sorokin points out that Tönnies created his essay during a time when the "Gesellschaft type of society" was "triumphantly rooting out the Gemeinschaft". However, even back then Tönnies highlighted the shortcomings of capitalism as a form of social life. The American edition of Tönnies' book, published in 1940, was its first complete translation to a foreign language (the 1927 Japanese edition had been shortened). P.A. Sorokin's "Foreword" to this edition marked the beginning of this writing's worldwide fame. This is the first time "Foreword" has ever been published in Russian. It was not included in the 2002 Russian edition of Tönnies' book. This publication, however, makes up for such an omission in theoretical sociology. The publication together with commentary has been prepared by N.A. Golovin.

The Message of the President of Uzbekistan Sh.M. Mirziyoyev to Oli Majlis notes that Uzbekistan will always be faithful to its principles in the sphere of interethnic harmony and religious tolerance, strengthening the atmosphere of mutual respect, friendship and harmony between representatives of different nations and faiths. It is considered as the greatest wealth of the state and society.

В статье анализируются взаимоотношения власти и общества, в первую очередь администраций губерний и органов местного самоуправления Средней Волги и Заволжья, в годы Думской монархии, их сотрудничество в хозяйственных и конфликты в социально-политических вопросах. ; In the article the interrelations between the authorities and society, in the first place the administration of provinces and organs of local government of Middle Volga region and Zavolzhye in the years of duma monarchy, their cooperation in economic and conflicts in social and political questions are analyzed.

International audience ; The object of the research in this article is a psychological and social experience of mystic studies. An interest in the phenomenon is increasing in terms of the modern spiritual crisis in the face of the threat of national, religious, political and other conflicts when the whole world safety is very vulnerable. Mystics may allow to find the universal source of all religions which is very important in the situation of the global rivalry of a great number of seekers for the truth. The research of the psychological (introvertive) and social (extravertive) experience of mystic studies makes it possible to find practical methods of transformation of human being and society. Methodology of the research is based on the comparative philosophical and religious analysis. The main research method is the comparative analysis. General scientific methods used by the researcher also include analysis, synthesis, generalization, and individualization. The author comes to the conclusion that mystic studies combined the world religious experience and devepoled a complex transformation system of the mental life of a person where all the levels of individual consciousness interact. Education of mentally healthy and self-actualized personality is the consequence of it. Mystic studies developed practical ways for the improvement of the social life on the basis of love, compassion and mutual respect. Mystic experience involves tolerant attitude to the representatives of another culture, religious confession or nationality. It sets the borders of the tolerance which is provoked by the need of an egocentric consciousness limitation. ; Объектом исследования в данной статье является психологический и социальный опыт мистических учений. Интерес к мистическому феномену возрастает в условиях современного духовного кризиса перед угрозой национальных, религиозных, политических и других конфликтов, когда очень уязвимой оказывается безопасность всего мирового сообщества. Мистика способна помочь найти универсальное ...

Purpose: to try to delineate the boundaries and formulate the characteristic features and signs of a "new normalcy", which, already taking shape today in the course of the ongoing development of the coronavirus pandemic, will in the long term be a determining factor for the further economic, political and social development of modern civilization.Methods: consists in a complex research paradigm, which includes the principles of systemic, theoretical-cognitive, institutional, instrumental and interdisciplinary approaches, mediated by the accepted in social science ideas about the relationship and interaction of subjective and objective factors in social processes with relative independence of the subject.Results: the general direction of the development of civilization will be the preservation, in the foreseeable future, of the requirements of social distancing and restrictions on cross-border mobility. Remote forms of work, low-contact manufacturing and the formation of Industry 4.0 will come to the fore in the economy. In society, there will be a need to revise modern social values, in the direction of the transition from the degree of satisfaction of individual and personal needs to the availability of such satisfaction as the main value. The central issue of post-image politics will be the question of whether the pandemic will bring about an anti-democratic rollback and an evolving authoritarianization of power, or, on the contrary, will become an impetus for the positive development of democracy, an increase in the role of civil society and the political participation of citizens.Conclusions and Relevance: with regard to the economy, society and politics, it is stated that, on the one hand, they will experience unprecedented transformational pressures under the influence of the ongoing pandemic crisis, but at the same time, they will face a choice – to maintain crisis stagnation hoping to "just survive" or perceive the crisis as source of new opportunities for development and progress. ; Цель работы заключается в попытке очертить границы и сформулировать характерные черты и признаки «новой нормальности», которая, формируясь уже сегодня, в процессе непрекращающегося развития пандемии коронавируса, будет в перспективе определяющим фактором для дальнейшего экономического, политического и социального развития современной цивилизации.Метод или методология проведения работы заключается в комплексной исследовательской парадигме, включающей в себя принципы системного, теоретико-познавательного, институционального, инструментального и междисциплинарного подходов, опосредованных принятыми в обществоведении представлениями о соотношении и взаимодействии субъективного и объективного факторов в общественных процессах при относительной самостоятельности субъекта.Результаты работы. Генеральным направлением развития цивилизации станет сохранение в обозримой перспективе требований социального дистанцирования и ограничения трансграничной мобильности. На передний план в экономике выйдут удаленные формы работы, малоконтактное производство и формирование индустрии 4.0. В социуме встанет необходимость пересмотра современных социальных ценностей, в направлении перехода от степени удовлетворения индивидуальных и личностных потребностей к доступности такового удовлетворения как основной ценности. Центральным вопросом постковидной политики выступит вопрос о том, вызовет ли пандемия к жизни антидемократический откат и эволюционирующую авторитаризацию власти или, напротив, станет толчком для позитивного развития демократии, повышения роли гражданского общества и политической партиципации граждан.Выводы. В отношении экономики, социума и политики констатируется, что они будут испытывать неслыханные трансформационные нагрузки под воздействием длящегося пандемического кризиса, но, в то же время, окажутся перед выбором – сохранять кризисную стагнацию, надеясь его «просто пережить», или воспринимать кризис как источник новых возможностей для развития и прогресса.

The study investigates the relationship between the spiritual and secular authorities regarding travelling arrangements for clergy in the territory of the Tobolsk North during the Synodical Period in the history of Russian Orthodoxy. The difficulties that abbots had to face when travelling to parishes were studied. For a long time travelling arrangements for clergy were unregulated and accompanied by abuse of indigenous population of the region. The search for mechanisms to ensure proper conditions for religious service, including the possibility of visiting parishes, required joint efforts of the state and the church. The secular authorities generally took a negative attitude to the requirements of priests and clergymen to freely use state-owned horses and questioned their travelling needs. Serving the fiscal interests of the State Treasury, the secular authorities were critical of the 'excessive zeal' of the clergy and tried to restrain the abuse of wandering and nomadic minorities. By the end of the studied period, the adoption of necessary legislative acts solved the problems of organizing trips for priests and clergymen to entrusted parishes. ; This study was conducted with the support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Department of Education and Youth Policy of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Area – Yugra № 18-49-86002

New forms of manifestations of religious intentions in socio-political space have constituted themselves as markers of transformation in the contemporary socio-political coordinates. Revision of the dominant traditional linear approaches placed the focus of ideological and political discussions about the correspondence of stable and variable, traditional and modern in a religious prism. Emerging new configurations in the public and private spheres mark transformation of the traditional relations between religion, society and the state corresponding to the logic of the project of modernity and the paradigm of secularization and require new interpretation optics. The contours of the new designs are evident in the contexts of new challenges and threats related to global political risks of religious terrorism, loss of monopoly on the description of reality, including moral connotations in the understanding of progress of the principle of secularism, with the increased importance of religious and confessional identity, civilizational, local and personal-individual levels, forming the hierarchy of values that determines horizons of public and personal goal setting. The penetration of religious meanings in the political and social reality of various areas, their incorporation into ideological discourses of identity build a wide variety of interpretations in the extreme poles of which is religious outline of internal and external threats to social stability and understanding of religion as a resource of optimization of the political system. Institutional, axiological and ontological projection refracts the religious factor in Russian society in polyvalent and nonlinear ways, reflecting the multidirectional vectors of ongoing transformation. On the basis of sociological data of The Institute of Sociology, RAS, the given article analyzes a number of subjects, reflecting qualitatively new social relationships. The emphasis is on multi-scale conflicts, correlation between the secular and the religious in the coordinates of importance of the democracy attributes and social significance of religion, institutional and value aspects as well as the dominant ideas in the Russian society about the role of Church, religion and religious faith in human life and society. Growing importance of religious factors and religious identities in contemporary conditions, the incorporation of religious meanings in different spheres of society intersect with ' the needs of ensuring the unity of values and stabilization of the social system, as well as close attention to Russian civilization experience. Despite increased sensitivity of contemporary debates on the tragectory of political practices in Russia, the religious factor could be a factor of social cohesion, determining the search of new forms of relations between the state and religious organizations based on the challenges and needs of society and identifying the need for improving mechanisms and practices of state-confessional relations.

The article examines the cognitive foundations of communicative practices in public administration of non-Western societies (specifically, the case of Japan).We have analyzed both legal and shadow channels that various interest groups use to influence how the institutes of public authorities distribute the 'public benefit'. All communicative practices in public services are included in a special model of social and political dispositions which largely define the efficiency of political system and its institutes in different countries. These dispositions and patterns of behavior explain why universal institutes and practices of democratic governance work differently in different societies.The structure of institutes of public administration in Japan is analogous to the Western parliamentary models, albeit adapted to the local cultural environment. This is why political communication in contemporary Japan works as a synthesis of tradition and institutional innovations. Advanced culture and the elites' focus on national interests made the Japanese system of public management extremely sensitive to external change and capable of transforming. While declaring continuity with religious, philosophical and ethical tradition, the Japanese always remain flexible and ready to adopt foreign practices if they are deemed useful for the country's development and enhance the power of the authorities. To help the society better understand them and adopt them in everyday life, these innovations are shaped in the forms of national culture. Adopted in this way, foreign practices appear as traditional Japanese, which meant that the very religious and philosophic tradition is "Westernized" and renovated to stand the challenges of new times. In this sense, the Japanese system of public administration is indeed innovative, as it keeps being perfected by drawing upon institutions and procedures of Western (both continental and Anglo-American) public administration ; В статье раскрывается проблема когнитивных основ формирования и функционирования коммуникативных практик в механизме публичного управления незападных обществ на примере Японии.Анализируются легальные и теневые каналы участия различных заинтересованных групп в распределении «общественного блага» с использованием институтов публичной власти. Все коммуникативные практики в сфере публичных услуг включены в особый образец социальных и политических диспозиций, которые в решающей мере определяют эффективность политической системы и ее институтов в разных странах. Диспозиции и паттерны поведения объясняют, почему универсальные институты и практики демократического правления по-разному работают в разных культурных средах. Структура институтов публичного управления в Японии аналогична парламентским моделям, распространенным на Западе, но адаптированным к местной культурной среде. По этой причине современная система политической коммуникации Японии представляет собой синтез традиционных начал и институциональных новаций. Благодаря развитой культурной традиции и ориентации элит на реализацию национальных интересов система публичного управления Японии чрезвычайно восприимчива к внешним изменениям и способна трансформироваться. Провозглашая свою исконную, глубинную связь с религиозно-философской и этической традицией, японцы, тем не менее, всегда проявляли большую гибкость и готовность принять иноземные элементы, если те открывали новые возможности для процветания страны и повышали легитимность публичной власти. Для лучшего восприятия и адаптации к повседневной жизни эти новшества были облечены в национально-культурные формы. Усвоенные таким образом зарубежные практики становились привычно японскими, что означало «вестернизацию» содержания религиозно-философской традиции, формирование на этой основе обновленной традиции, переосмысленной в соответствии с требованиями времени. В этом смысле система государственного управления Японии носит инновационный характер, она постоянно совершенствовалась путем заимствования институтов и процедур западного (континентального и англо-американского) государственного менеджмента.

The article discusses the role of the civil society in improving the quality and efficiency of public administration. The experience of use in Russia of borrowed from western countries technologies related to the expansion of public participation in the activities of the authorities is analyzed. The attention is focused on the work of institutions such as the Open Government and the Russian Social Initiative, and their importance for the further growth of social efficiency of public administration. ; Рассматривается роль гражданского общества в повышении качества и эффективности государственного управления. Анализируется опыт применения в России заимствованных у западных стран технологий, связанных с расширением общественного участия в деятельности власти. Акцентируется внимание на работе таких институтов как Открытое правительство и «Российская общественная инициатива» и их значении для дальнейшего роста социальной эффективности государственного управления.

The article analyzes the problems of formation of Venetian mentality in the middle Ages. Basic principles of the Venetian's «mental map» had an influence on the social and political model of the Republic of San Marco. ; The article analyzes the problems of formation of Venetian mentality in the middle Ages. Basic principles of the Venetian's «mental map» had an influence on the social and political model of the Republic of San Marco.

Advocacy as a classic strategy provides for the creation of mass or network communication. Methods of using the strategy of propaganda, which provides for the establishment of interpersonal communication or cluster is called agitation. Campaigning has its own specific characteristics and special requirements to the personality of the sender of the message. The article presents the rules parry kontragitatsionnoy work (antitrolling).