Reading Kurt Wolff
In: Qualitative sociology, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 107-113
ISSN: 1573-7837
2489 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Qualitative sociology, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 107-113
ISSN: 1573-7837
In: NACLA Report on the Americas, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 12-13
ISSN: 2471-2620
In: Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Germanistische Abteilung, Band 102, Heft 1, S. 239-246
ISSN: 2304-4861
In: Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung, Band 101, Heft 1, S. 476-491
ISSN: 2304-4934
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 66, Heft 2, S. 189-190
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 81, Heft 6, S. 1516-1518
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 553-559
ISSN: 1744-9324
It is the contention of Robert Paul Wolff that we live under governments which have no right to govern us. Most of us of course believe that our governments have legitimate authority. We believe that by far the greater part of what our governments require of us they have the authority to require. Wolff insists that it does not follow from our belief that most, or at least many, governments rightfully govern, that in fact any government rightfully governs. He is right of course; it does not follow, unless our beliefs are true. And we might be mistaken. The question is, are we?
In: Stefan Kadelbach, Thomas Kleinlein and David Roth-Isigkeit (eds), System and Order in International Law, OUP: 2017, pp. 216–239
SSRN
In: International law reports, Band 22, S. 718-719
ISSN: 2633-707X
718International Organization — Specialized Agencies — International Monetary Fund — Articles of Agreement of — Regulation of Currency and International Exchange — Recognition of Such Regulation by Other States — International Recognition of Exchange Control Regulations — Effect of Membership in International Monetary Fund.
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 336-336
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 85, Heft 2, S. 312-313
ISSN: 1538-165X
In: Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung, Band 84, Heft 1, S. 400-404
ISSN: 2304-4934
In: kma: das Gesundheitswirtschaftsmagazin, Band 27, Heft 12, S. 15-15
ISSN: 2197-621X
Cyberkriminelle legten Anfang November die Systeme des Knittlinger Medizintechnikunternehmens Richard Wolff GmbH lahm.
In: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, Band 104, Heft 1, S. 131-163
ISSN: 1613-0650
Abstract
In this paper, I discuss Christian Wolff's conception of motivating and normative reasons. My aim is to show that in the discussion of error cases, Wolff pursues a strategy that is strikingly similar to the strategy of contemporary defenders of nicht-psychologist accounts of motivating reasons. According to many nicht-psychologist views, motivating reasons are facts. My aim is to show that Wolff's motivation in pursuing this strategy is very different. The point is that due to his commitment to the Principle of Sufficient Reason, Wolff has to show that error cases are compatible with the PSR. The issue is worth discussing because it is not yet sufficiently explored what motivating reasons are, according to Wolff, and how they relate, in substance, to normative reasons. Methodologically, my approach can be characterized as one of "mutual illumination": I think it is possible to highlight some crucial ambiguities of Wolff's conception against the backdrop of the contemporary conception of motivating reasons, but also to question the importance and role of the ontological question of what motivating reasons are in contemporary discussions against the backdrop of Wolff's position.