Suchergebnisse

With recent research and clinical advancements progressing, great strides have been made in treating both infectious and non-infectious diseases more specifically and with limited side effects. Nanotechnology in medicine has revolutionized drug delivery and improved treatment options. While they have increased efficacy, bioavailability, dose–response, targeting ability, combat antimicrobial resistance, and enhanced safety, the field is often unexplored and limited to academic institutional interests. Government support, specific flagship programmes, and more significant investments in this field could yield promising results with a greater understanding of its usage and related adverse effects.

PurposeThe central aim of this paper is to give an overview of theory and research on the crossover of (work‐related) wellbeing from employees to their partners at home. In addition, it seeks to discuss studies on the crossover of wellbeing from employees to their colleagues in the workplace. It aims to discuss possible moderators of the crossover effect and delineate a research agenda.Design/methodology/approachThe paper takes the form of a literature review.FindingsThe review of the literature shows that strain may spillover from work to home, and consequently influence, the wellbeing of one's partner. Additionally, the paper discusses recent studies documenting that the enthusiasm for one's work may cross over to the partner as well. Furthermore, research has shown that employees influence one another in the workplace. Several conditions may facilitate such crossover, including the frequency of interactions, empathy, susceptibility to contagion, and similarity. The paper outlines a research agenda, and indicates what the gaps in the literature are.Originality/valueThe literature review reveals which advancements can be made in crossover theory. One way would be to further validate the spillover‐crossover model. This model postulates that job demands lead to work‐family conflict, which, in turn, leads to conflict with the partner (social undermining). Thus, job strain (or work engagement) first spills over from work to home, and then crosses over to the partner. This interaction sequence consequently influences the partner's wellbeing.

The advancement of international law presupposes that the objections are met. The 'realist' objection claims that sovereign states deciding matters cast over the precept that 'might is right'. This title shows the invention of two techniques in positive law: state contracts and transnational arbitration without privity, Any talk of the advancement of international law presupposes that two objections are met. The first is the 'realist' objection which, observing the state of international relations today, claims that when it comes down to the important things in international life-war and peace, and more generally power politics among states-no real advancement has been made: international society remains a society of sovereign states deciding matters with regard solely to their own best interests and with international law all too often being no more than a thin cloak cast over the precept that 'might is right'. Against this excessive scepticism stands excessive optimism: international law is supposedly making giant strides forward thanks especially to the tremendous mass of soft law generated by international organisations over the past sixty years and more. By incautiously mixing all manner of customs, treaties, resolutions and recommendations, a picture of international law is painted that has little to do with the 'real world'. The essays collected in this book are arranged into three sections. The first purports to show from the specific example of international investment law that the past half-century has seen the invention of two genuinely new techniques in positive law: state contracts and transnational arbitration without privity. This is 'advancement' in international law not because the techniques are 'good' in themselves (one may well think them 'bad') but because they have introduced legal possibilities into international law that did not exist heretofore. The second section examines the theoretical consequences of those new legal techniques and especially the way they affect the theory of the state. The third widens the field of view and asks whether European law has surpassed international law in a move towards federalism or whether it represents a step forward for international law. These reflections make for a clearer theoretical understanding of what constitutes true advancement in international law. Such an understanding should give pause both to those who argue that hardly any progress has been made, and to those who are overly fanciful about progress

If robots are not common everyday objects, it is maybe because we have looked robotic applications without considering sufficient attention what could be the experience of interacting with a robot. This article introduces the idea of a value profile, a notion intended to capture the general evolution of our experience with different kinds of objects. In the past two decades, robotics has evolved immensely with increased prospects in biological, healthcare, medicine and surgery industry. Robots are being used in almost everything and almost everywhere. However, they are not to replace qualified human workforce, instead, assist them in routine work and precision tasks to achieve high throughput. Advancements in micro- and nano-robotic devices is very much dependent on innovations in micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) and nanoelectromechanical systems (NEMS) with collaborations among diverse domains of research viz., life science, medicine/surgery and engineering. This paper highlights the advancement of Robotics in Neuroscience, Medical Science and IOT in the context of Robotics

Abstract
This paper distills arguments by Indigenous public intellectual Noel Pearson in support of an "uplift" agenda for remote Australian Aboriginal communities suffering corrosive disadvantage and intergenerational dysfunction. Pearson draws on Amartya Sen while prioritizing personal responsibility, and attempts a synthesis of liberalism, social democracy, and capabilities building. The present paper also draws on Martha Nussbaum's and Rutger Claassen's capabilities approaches, with points of resonance and/or agreement with Pearson's arguments highlighted. Under a charitable reading, Pearson's position is defensible against prevailing criticisms, including the criticism that his responsibility emphasis leads him to misunderstand and misapply Sen's capabilities theory, and that his policies are illiberally perfectionist and paternalistic, ultimately assimilationist, and in breach of Kant's humanity principle.