Suchergebnisse

Warum beschäftigen sich die Menschen mit bestimmten Problemen und ignorieren andere? Warum wendet sich die Politik bestimmten Themen zu und kümmert sich um andere nicht? Warum erscheinen Themen plötzlich irrelevant, obwohl sie eben noch die öffentliche Diskussion dominierten? Eine Antwort auf diese Frage gibt der Agenda-Setting-Ansatz. Er unterstellt, dass die Thematisierung gesellschaftlicher Probleme durch die Massenmedien darüber entscheidet, welchen Problemen sich eine Gesellschaft zuwendet.Der Band, der für die Neuauflage aktualisiert und erweitert wurde, gibt eine knappe, leicht lesbare Einführung in die theoretischen Grundlagen, methodischen Zugänge, empirischen Befunde und gesellschaftlichen Konsequenzen des Agenda-Setting-Effekts der Massenmedien. Er diskutiert die Stärken und Schwächen sowie Weiterentwicklungen des Ansatzes. Verwandte Ansätze wie Priming und Framing werden beschrieben und in den Kontext der Agenda-Setting-Forschung eingeordnet.Das Werk eignet sich als Lehrbuch für Studierende ebenso wie als Einstiegslektüre für Kommunikationspraktiker und andere Interessierte

he process of agenda setting is fundamental to politics, yet there is surprisingly little research about this process in parliamentary systems. The reason for this lacuna is that agenda setting tends to occur behind closed doors. The Dutch Tweede Kamer is an exception to this rule: decisions about the parliamentary agenda are made in public. This study examines agenda setting in the Dutch parliament from an issue-competition perspective. It looks at a sample of more than 400 agenda-setting meetings of the Dutch parliament between 1998 and 2017. It finds that opposition parties which stand far from the government make proposals on issues that they 'own'; these proposals are supported by other opposition parties, parties that stand close to them and focus on the same issue. Coalition parties and parties that stand far away sabotage these proposals.

Intro -- Contents -- Tables and Figures -- Acknowledgments -- Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Issues and Issue Types -- 3 The Media Agenda -- 4 The Public Agenda -- 5 The Policy Agenda -- 6 Modelling Agenda-Setting -- 7 Expanding the Models -- 8 Final Conclusions -- References -- Index.

Research using this model of agenda setting, generally assess the elections and political issues. Since McComb and Shaw (1972) examined the general election in 1968 with a focus on the effects of media agenda setting. They were interested to see whether the opinions of voters on issues that are considered very important it is formed by the news about these issues. McComb and Shaw in researching elections, said that the impact of mass media in the cause of cognitive change among individuals has been dubbed the agenda setting function of mass communication. Here lies the most important effects of mass communication, namely the ability of structuring the world's media for us.

Society's need for surveillance makes what is consequential a mutual concern of the media and their audiences. Both need to pay attention to what is consequential. We looked at agenda setting in two ways: (1) reasons given for moving a topic up (or down) on the agenda; and (2) consequentiality as evident in respondent ideas about a topic. A new research technique, Cognigraphics, was used for the second part. Results are discussed in terms of how an agenda, as a societal tool, and how those persons most eager to move a topic on an agenda can make use of the kinds and extent of consequentiality seen for a topic. A society's needs to respond to what is consequential might necessitate agenda-setting innovations to improve media performance.