"11 December 1978." ; Shipping list no.: 89-483-P. ; "Reprint which includes current pages from changes 1 and 2." ; Cover title. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; 14
"This material appeared originally in Public documents . It was privately reprinted without change in 1935, was revised and published by the Library of Congress in 1939 and is here reissued with slight revision of the introductory section."--p. [2] ; At head of title: Library of Congress. Division of documents. ; Mode of access: Internet.
This article provides a biographical look at the American author James Fenimore Cooper. It traces his roots from his youth in Cooperstown—named after his father William—to his ill-timed naval career, and on to his time as a self-conscious novelist.
Letters and accompanying envelopes written by Charles F. Weller to Miss Katherine A. McElwain of Beaver, Pennsylvania from 1862-1865 from his time as a union soldier in the American Civil War.
The title 'Forgetting Foucault?', minus the question mark (a very important omission, of course), is one I have borrowed from Baudrillard's famous paper of 1980 which tries to cut Foucault's thesis about power/knowledge down to size but fails to tell us exactly why Foucault should be forgotten'. 1 Racevskis describes the Baudrillard article as 'a fairly abstruse poetico-philosophic essay that indicts Foucault for collusion with prevailing myth-making strategies. Foucault,' Racevskis continues, 'is shown by Baudrillard to have become infatuated with the imagi- nary force of his own discourse, and his genealogy is depicted as a system satisfying a certain hegemonic logic of reason. ' 2 In effect, not only has Foucault not been forgotten, the contrary is the case; a Foucault industry has grown over the ten years since his death with a Centre for Foucauldian Studies set up in Paris. What were Foucault's own views about his posterity? Why would Baudrillard want us to forget Foucault and what is this continuing presence his memory constitutes? ; peer-reviewed
We broke camp at an early hour marched about one mile formed line of battle and lay down remained there about 4 hours we then took the advance of the fifth Corps marched some five miles and came on to the Rebels the skir- mishers opened a brisk fire the Rebs falling back our Regmt [sic] went to the front formed line and advanced under a heavy fire from the emenies guns but they soon fell back we marched about three miles when the colum [sic] halted for the night my Regt went on picket. 4 men were wounded. We took ten prisoners.
Inspection report of the quarters of the American Literary, Scientific and Military Academy by the officer of the day, John A. Harleston, on 22 June 1823.