Suchergebnisse

Carlsnaes, W.: Teorier om politiska allianser i internationell politik. - S. 9-14 Skogan, J. K.: Norske alliansetradisjoner. - S. 15-22 Graeger, N.: Norge, USA og de nye NATO. - S. 23-30 Rieker, P.: EU og Norden som militaerallianser og alliansepartnere for Norge. - S. 31-36 Haugevik, K. M.: Internasjonale sikkerhetsorganisasjoner som kontekst. - S. 37-44 Torjesen, S.: Hva med Russland? - S. 45-52

The teaching staff in Lund, having reviewed the above-stated guidelines developed in Goteborg, couldn't adopt the guidelines without further discussion. Among their concerns were the requirement that all articles be written in the same language, rather than permitting (as an example) a mix of Swedish and English articles, and the lack of any requirement that the articles be accepted for publication. They furthermore concluded that the development of guidelines could benefit from national oversight on the part of an organization such as the Statsvetenskapliga Forbundet. They also stated that data should be gathered on practices among faculty at institutions other than the one at Goteborg. Other potential pitfalls raised include the danger that articles either won't come together and fit as a whole or between them will serve to repeat the same argument. The author states his personal concern that criteria concerning what is expected of a doctoral candidate will be based on his compilation thesis rather than the other way around. Finally, the author raises the question as to why one should write a compilation thesis at all and under what circumstances it is to be preferred over a monograph. Any guidelines developed should not only aid in guarding against the above-mentioned pitfalls but should also include positive examples of what constitutes. Adapted from the source document.