Suchergebnisse

Research following the terrorist attacks July 22nd 2011 has been especially challenging, due to the extreme nature of the events and the trauma for those involved; both directly as victims and indirectly as family, relatives and friends.

Cover -- Title Page -- Copyright -- Body -- 171 Bewahre uns, Gott, behüte uns, Gott -- 211 Gott, der du alles Leben schufst -- 219 Herr Jesu Christ, du höchstes Gut -- 224 Du hast zu deinem Abendmahl -- 233 Ach Gott und Herr -- 246 Ach bleib bei uns, Herr Jesu Christ -- 271 Wie herrlich gibst du, Herr, dich zu erkennen -- 331 Großer Gott, wir loben dich -- 338 Alte mit den Jungen sollen loben -- 359 In dem Herren freuet euch -- 369 Wer nur den lieben Gott lässt walten -- 377 Zieh an die Macht, du Arm des Herrn -- 402 Meinen Jesus lass ich nicht -- 500 Lobt Gott in allen Landen -- 501 Wie lieblich ist der Maien -- 525 Mach's mit mir, Gott, nach deiner Güt -- 535 Gloria sei dir gesungen -- Verzeichnis der bereits erschienenen Liedkommentare

Hans Morgenthau's Scientific Man vs. Power Politics appeared in 1946, one year after he received tenure at the University of Chicago. Thus, the monograph demarcates the beginning of Morgenthau's career in the United States, to which he had emigrated nine years earlier. Three main aspects seem important for understanding this work. The first is Morgenthau's bewilderment about American political culture and, as he perceived it, its cheerful optimism about the betterment of politics, society, and humanity in general. The second aspect is the nature of the argument: Scientific Man is a dogmatic tract, an attempt to hammer home certain philosophical positions—positions that were largely unpopular in the U.S. social sciences in the 1940s (and later)—rather than a reflective scholarly elaboration of certain philosophical commitments. The third is Morgenthau's place between two academic cultures: Morgenthau's language in his American writings partly stems from, but also tries to leave behind, his European academic socialization. The monograph thus reflects the author's peculiar situation, as he inhabits two sometimes crucially different semantic and cultural contexts, but fails to bridge or broker them.