Suchergebnisse

From searching the works of José Martí in Google Scholar and the use of tools such as Publish or Perish, bibliometric indicators could be determined as the h index that shows the impact of Marti's work. The high values of h that achieves José Martí as author, would place him as a leading researcher currently, with a remarkable impact on Social Sciences. It was determined the Works of José Martí most cited, among which is in the first place "Nuestra America", which is demonstrated both by the total citations achieved, as following the annual variation for over 20 years.
Author's profile for José Martí, in Google Scholar was prepared allowing researchers to establish the authors and articles or books that cite the work of José Martí and opens the way for further research into the network of references to these

Este comentario analiza la sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia en el asunto C-289/21, IG. El objeto de este asunto fue la compatibilidad con el art. 47 de la Carta de Derechos Fundamentales de la UE de una norma procesal, por la que quedaba sin objeto un recurso contra una disposición reglamentaria si esta era objeto de derogación. Así como el TJUE señaló que tal mecanismo no resulta incompatible con el principio de equivalencia, sí afirmó que era contrario al de efectividad y al art. 47 CDF, por cuanto no garantizaba la consideración de los efectos de la norma sobre el recurrente.
Iruzkin honetan, Justizia Auzitegiak C-289/21 gaiari buruz emandako epaia aztertzen da. Gai horren xedea EBko Oinarrizko Eskubideen Gutunaren 47. artikuluaren eta arau prozesal baten arteko bateragarritasuna izan zen; arau prozesal haren arabera, ez zegoen arrazoirik erregelamenduzko xedapenen aurkako errekurtsoetarako, erregelamenduzko xedapenak indargabetuz gero. Europar Batasuneko Justizia Auzitegiak adierazi zuen mekanismo hori ez dela bateraezinabaliokidetasun-printzipioarekin baina eraginkortasun-printzipioaren eta EBko Oinarrizko Eskubideen Gutunaren 47. artikuluaren aurkakoa zela, arauak errekurtsogilearentzat zituen ondorioak kontuan hartzea bermatzen ez zuelako.
This comment examines the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-289/21, IG. The subject-matter of this case was the compatibility with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of a procedural rule according to which, a case was devoid of object if it was previously derogated. Whilstthe CJEU indicated that such mechanism was not incompatible with the principle of equivalence it held that it was irreconcilable with the principle of effectivity and Article 47 as it did not guarantee the examination of the effects of the rule on the plaintiff.

La presente crónica da cuenta del gran número de resoluciones, más de cincuenta, que ha dictado el Tribunal Constitucional en relación a la prohibición de doble tributación de los impuestos propios autonómicos en su solapamiento con los tributos estatal y locales y que se encuentra contemplada en el art. 6 LOFCA. Se repara en la infructuosa modificación legal operada para poner freno a tanta conflictividad y en el devenir de la doctrina constitucional, con un caso paradigmático en el que, ante el mismo tributo propio extremeño, las STC 179/2006 y 22/2015 declararon su inconstitucional y la posterior STC 120/2018 confirmó su constitucionalidad.

Kronika honek ematen du berri Estatuko eta tokiko zergekin zergapetze bikoitzaren debekuari buruzko Konstituzio Auzitegiak ebatzitako kasu ugarietaz, berrogeita hamar baino gehiago. Debeku hau AEFLOren 6. artikuluan kokatzen da. Hainbeste gatazkari aurre egiteko egindako lege-aldaketa hutseginari eta konstituzio-doktrinaren bilakaerari erreparatzen zaie, eta kasu paradigmatiko batean, Extremadurako tributu beraren aurrean, Konstituzio Auzitegiaren 179/2006 eta 22/2015 epaiek Konstituzioaren kontrakotzat jo zuten, eta, aldiz, Konstituzio Auzitegiaren 120/2018 epaiak konstituzionaltasuna berretsi zuen.

This chronicle considers the large number of resolutions, more than fifty, deliverd by the Constitutional court on the ban of double taxation of regional taxes in their overlapping with State and local taxation and that is contemplated in art. 6 LOFCA. It is noticed the unsuccesful legal amendment introduced to discourage such large amount of cases and the evolution of the constitutional doctrine with a paradigmatic case where the same tax from Extremadura was declared unconstitutional by judgments 197/2006 and 22/2015 and then the forthcoming judgment 120/2018 confirmed its constitutionality.

This article is about the concept of the contemporary city - the influence that technology has when one thinks about, plans and lives in a city. The conjunction of technology and city reformulates customs and social practices; it can even determine the way one constitutes one's own identity. One can see how close the relation is between technology (specifically, TICS) and the structures of the city in a wide variety of situations: in social interactions on the street, in transport, and in ways of buying, of working and entertainment. '@City' is a concept that very well reflects the emergent properties of a current city, that is, the coexistence of a physical and a virtual urban space. The '22@Barcelona' project attempts to bring together different types of spaces. By combining the physical with the virtual, 22@Barcelona, as a neighborhood of @City, creates an uncertain and blurred border between both spaces. The article also examines the impact that these spaces have on the psycho-social processes involved in the daily life of a traditionally working-class neighborhood, now strongly limited by technological boundaries.