Suchergebnisse

Engl. Zsfassungen

Тематски Зборник Свакодневна култура у постсоцијалистичком периоду настао је као резултат научне сарадње Етнографског института САНУи Етнографског института и музеја БАН. Велике политичке и друштвене промене током деведесетих година 20.века озбиљно су се одразиле на свакодневну културу балканских земаља. Управо у периоду кризе, две суседне етнолошке установе, бугарска и српска, које више деценија током социјалисатичког периода нису сарађивале, отпочеле су заједнички рад на истраживању свакодневне културе. Зборник показује у ком правацу су се одвијали културни процеси у Србији и Бугарској, које су сличности и разлике међу њима, али и шта се дешава у постсоцијалистичком периоду у појединим сегментима свакодневне култура Словака, Руса и Македонаца. ; The Collection of Papers entitled ―Everyday Culture in post-socialist period is a result of collaboration between the Institute of Ethnography, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, and the Institute of Ethnography and Museum, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. The enormous political and social changes during the 1990's influenced also everyday culture of the Balkans states. After decades of hinder, and precisely in the period of crisis, two neighboring ethnological institutions, the Bulgarian and Serbian, started to cooperate together in the study of everyday culture.The Collection of Papers demonstrates the directions of the cultural processes in Serbia and Bulgaria, accentuating the differences and similarities among the two states, and also explains the deeds within certain segments of everyday cultures of Slovaks, Russians and Macedonians. ; Зборник радова Етнографског института САНУ 22 / Collection of Papers of the Institute of Ethnography SASA 22

The book sheds new light on the Kyustendil action to save the Bulgarian Jews, reported a reporter for ""Focus"". Its author is the historian Associate Professor Angel Johnev, and it is published on the occasion of the 80th anniversary of the Kyustendil action to save the Bulgarian Jews. In it, the events of March 1943, their connection, the anti-Jewish policy, the emergence of the Jewish question in Bulgaria, as well as its culmination and the famous Kyustendil action of March 1943 are told in as much detail as possible.

Jorge Kosikov is a Brazilian lawyer and writer of Bulgarian origin. Among the Bulgarians in South America, Jorge Kosikov is known as a missionary of Bulgarian history and culture. Jorge Kosikov is a descendant of two waves of immigration - one from Bessarabia during the Ottoman rule in the late 18th and early 19th century and the other from Bessarabia to South America in the early 20th century. In this book the author explores and describes the Bessarabian Bulgarians and Gagauz colonies in four Brazilian states: ""Aurora"", ""Baliza"", ""Concordia"" (""Buri""), ""Esperanza"", ""Fethiseiro"", ""New Bessarabia"", ""Page"", ""Prata"", ""Setenta"", ""Concordia"" (Parana), ""Terra Rica"", ""Colonia Velha"", ""Lajeado Enrique"", as well as the Uruguayan ""Concordia""

When something or someone is being declared "the best of everything possible" this a priori and a posteriori wrong. This is not useful for that "something" or that "someone" because their natural competitors do not share that thought and they do not sleep. Nobody can stop the development, regardless of the direction, in some or other assessment criteria. Long ago the political democracy has been declared such a perfect "something". But credibility in it begins to fall exactly where it has taken strong roots. For opponents, this is a thing that has been known long ago. Now there are empirically on the subject, but there are no convincing explanations of the data. The article offers a possible interpretation of that crisis of confidence in democracy. Specific tools developed by author and called by him Scanner, were used for the analysis. The conclusions are: democratization as a process is supported by its actual effectivity, and it is cyclical; there are many different democratic models competing with each other; nowhere ever has existed uninterrupted and one-way democratic development; democratic content is most often helpless a form countering undemocratic aggression outside. The text is not a requiem for democracy, but an attempt to breathe new life into the political process and to understand the emerging new phenomena in the world understood in today's mainstream as a subversion of modernity – for example in USA (Trump (UK (Brexit (China (Xi Jinping (Russia (Putin (Philippines (DuTerte (South Africa (Zuma (Turkey (Erdogan (and many other places in the 21st century.