Suchergebnisse

Comprend : Fol. 1 r °. (Titre ms. ci-dessus, de la main de P. L'Étoile. (En regard :) Une notice bibliographique ms.) ; Fol. 1 v °. Le Pourtraict et description du Politique de ce temps. (Avec fig. gravée sur bois.) ; (Un arrêté des maire et eschevins de la ville de Troyes.) ; Chant Rial en dialgue ("sic") ; Fol. 2-4 r °. Briefue description des diverses cruautez que les catholiques endurent en Angleterre pour la foy. (1 feuillet et 3 planches.) ; Fol. 4 v °-6 v °. (Procession de Pénitents.) (Gravures sur bois, coloriées.) ; Fol. 7 r °. Demonstration de l'assemblée publique des Estats tenuz en la ville et chasteau de Blois, soubs le perfide Henry de Vallois. Et comme ayant communié avec Messeigneurs de Guyse, il les fait massacrer à coups de poignards. (Gravure sur bois, avec légende.) ; Fol. 7 v °. En ceste figure henry de vallois faict assassiner trahitrement monsieur le duc de guise. (Gravure sur bois, avec légende.) ; Fol. 8 r °. Le martire cruel du Reuerendissime Cardinal de guise. (Gravure sur bois, avec légende.) ; (Ordonnance du roi au sujet de la levée des troupes, datée de juillet 1580.) ; (Une lettre du conseil général des catholiques, du 22 juin 1589.) ; Fol. 8 v °. Le soufflement et conseil diabolique depernon a Henry De Vallois, Pour saccager les catholiques. (Gravure sur bois, avec légende.) ; (Un portrait du duc d'Épernon, gravé par Léonard Gaultier, en 1587.) ; Fol. 9 r °. Comme les deux Princes estans morts sont mis sur une table, auec la remonstrance de Madame de Nemours, à Henry de Valloys. Et l'emprisonnement de messiurs les Princes Catholicques. (Gravure sur bois, avec légende.) ; Badauderie insigne de Paris contre le Roy et le Duc Desparnon, extraite d'un de leurs escrits imprimés au dit Paris, intitulé : Les Choses horribles contenues en une lettre enuoiee à Henri de Valois par un Enfant de Paris, le 28 Januier 1589. (Copie manuscrite.) ; Fol. 9 v °. Le faux mufle decouuert du grand hypocrite de la France, contenant les faicts plus memorables par luy exercez enuers les Catholiques en ces ...

The article analyses the notes, which were prepared by provisional investigation commissions formed by the Seimas, in which it was suggested that the Seimas should either agree or disagree on the abolition of the immunity of a Member of the Seimas. In the opinion of the author, an analysis of these notes permits to assert that these notes often have essential drawbacks: the notes contain insufficient arguments following which the commission substantiates its proposal that the Seimas should not give its consent to hold a Member of the Seimas criminally liable, to arrest him or restrict he freedom otherwise; at times such notes do not contain any such arguments at all; sometimes the commissions exceed the powers granted to them and undertake functions which are not characteristic of such commissions. The Constitution establishes the immunity of a Member of the Seimas not for the purpose that a Member of the Seimas who committed a crime could avoid criminal liability, but that he would not be held criminally liable in the absence of legal grounds, that he would not be persecuted for political or other similar reasons, and that no influence (which is prohibited by the Constitution) would be exerted on him due to his activity in the capacity of a Member of the Seimas.

The article analyses the notes, which were prepared by provisional investigation commissions formed by the Seimas, in which it was suggested that the Seimas should either agree or disagree on the abolition of the immunity of a Member of the Seimas. In the opinion of the author, an analysis of these notes permits to assert that these notes often have essential drawbacks: the notes contain insufficient arguments following which the commission substantiates its proposal that the Seimas should not give its consent to hold a Member of the Seimas criminally liable, to arrest him or restrict he freedom otherwise; at times such notes do not contain any such arguments at all; sometimes the commissions exceed the powers granted to them and undertake functions which are not characteristic of such commissions. The Constitution establishes the immunity of a Member of the Seimas not for the purpose that a Member of the Seimas who committed a crime could avoid criminal liability, but that he would not be held criminally liable in the absence of legal grounds, that he would not be persecuted for political or other similar reasons, and that no influence (which is prohibited by the Constitution) would be exerted on him due to his activity in the capacity of a Member of the Seimas.